Patient- and caregiver-reported impact of symptoms in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: To better understand the disease burden faced by individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) of all ages and elucidate potential targets for therapeutics, this study determined the prevalence and relative importance of symptoms experienced by individuals with DMD and identified factors associated with a higher disease burden. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with individuals with DMD and caregivers of individuals with DMD to identify potential symptoms of importance to those living with DMD. We subsequently performed a cross-sectional study to assess which symptoms have the highest prevalence and importance in DMD and to determine which factors are associated with a higher disease burden. RESULTS: Thirty-nine individuals, aged 11 years and above, provided 3262 quotes regarding the symptomatic burden of DMD. Two hundred participants (87 individuals with DMD and 113 caregivers) participated in a subsequent cross-sectional study. Individuals with DMD identified limitations with mobility or walking (100%), inability to do activities (98.9%), trouble getting around (97.6%), and leg weakness (97.6%) as the most prevalent and life altering symptomatic themes in DMD. The symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence, as reported by caregivers on behalf of those with DMD for whom they care, were limitations with mobility or walking (90.3%), leg weakness (89.2%), and emotional issues (79.6%). Steroid/glucocorticoid use (e.g., prednisone or deflazacort) was associated with a lower level of disease burden in DMD. DISCUSSION: There are many symptomatic themes that contribute to disease burden in individuals with DMD. These symptoms are identified by both individuals with DMD and their caregivers and have a variable level of importance and prevalence in the DMD population.

A checklist for clinical trials in rare disease: obstacles and anticipatory actions-lessons learned from the FOR-DMD trial.

BACKGROUND: Trials in rare diseases have many challenges, among which are the need to set up multiple sites in different countries to achieve recruitment targets and the divergent landscape of clinical trial regulations in those countries. Over the past years, there have been initiatives to facilitate the process of international study set-up, but the fruits of these deliberations require time to be operationally in place. FOR-DMD (Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy) is an academic-led clinical trial which aims to find the optimum steroid regimen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 5 years (July 2010 to June 2015), anticipating that all sites (40 across the USA, Canada, the UK, Germany and Italy) would be open to recruitment from July 2011. However, study start-up was significantly delayed and recruitment did not start until January 2013. METHOD: The FOR-DMD study is used as an example to identify systematic problems in the set-up of international, multi-centre clinical trials. The full timeline of the FOR-DMD study, from funding approval to site activation, was collated and reviewed. Systematic issues were identified and grouped into (1) study set-up, e.g. drug procurement; (2) country set-up, e.g. competent authority applications; and (3) site set-up, e.g. contracts, to identify the main causes of delay and suggest areas where anticipatory action could overcome these obstacles in future studies. RESULTS: Time from the first contact to site activation across countries ranged from 6 to 24 months. Reasons of delay were universal (sponsor agreement, drug procurement, budgetary constraints), country specific (complexity and diversity of regulatory processes, indemnity requirements) and site specific (contracting and approvals). The main identified obstacles included (1) issues related to drug supply, (2) NIH requirements regarding contracting with non-US sites, (3) differing regulatory requirements in the five participating countries, (4) lack of national harmonisation with contracting and the requirement to negotiate terms and contract individually with each site and (5) diversity of languages needed for study materials. Additionally, as with many academic-led studies, the FOR-DMD study did not have access to the infrastructure and expertise that a contracted research organisation could provide, organisations often employed in pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. This delay impacted recruitment, challenged the clinical relevance of the study outcomes and potentially delayed the delivery of the best treatment to patients. CONCLUSION: Based on the FOR-DMD experience, and as an interim solution, we have devised a checklist of steps to not only anticipate and minimise delays in academic international trial initiation but also identify obstacles that will require a concerted effort on the part of many stakeholders to mitigate.

Health profile of a cohort of adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION: As the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) population ages, it is essential that we understand the late-stage health profile and provide the appropriate care for this emerging population. METHODS: We undertook a descriptive study to document the health profile of a cohort of adults with DMD using data from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance Tracking and Research network (MD STARnet). Data included information collected from Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Georgia, and 12 counties in western New York on individuals born since January 1982 and followed through December 2012. RESULTS: In 208 adults with DMD, the number of individuals (N) and median ages (years) at which certain critical milestones were crossed and interventions initiated were as follows: development of cardiomyopathy, N = 145 (16.7); initiation of non-invasive ventilation, N = 99 (18.0); gastrostomy, N = 47 (19.0); and death, N = 59 (21.8). DISCUSSION: These population-based data provide critical information about late-stage health profiles among adults with DMD for developing appropriate models of care. Muscle Nerve 58: 219-223, 2018.