Racial Disparities in Treatment and Outcomes of Patients With Hepatitis C Undergoing Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: African Americans have the highest prevalence of chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Racial disparities in outcome are observed after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study sought to identify if disparities in treatments and outcomes exist between Black and White patients who have HCV prior to elective THA and TKA. METHODS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, HCV characteristics, perioperative variables, in-hospital outcomes, and postoperative complications at 1-year follow-up were collected and compared between the 2 races. Patients who have preoperative positive viral load (PVL) and undetectable viral load were identified. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, while 2-tailed Student's Kruskal-Wallis t-tests were used for continuous variables. A P value of less than .05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: The liver function parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase and model for end-stage liver disease scores, were all higher preoperatively in Black patients undergoing THA (P = .01; P < .001) and TKA (P = .03; P = .003), respectively. Black patients were more likely to undergo THA (65.8% versus 35.6%; P = .002) and TKA (72.1% versus 37.3%; 0.009) without receiving prior treatment for HCV. Consequently, Black patients had higher rates of preoperative PVL compared to White patients in both THA (66% versus 38%, P = .006) and TKA (72% versus 37%, P < .001) groups. Black patients had a longer length of stay for both THA (3.7 versus 3.3; P = .008) and TKA (4.1 versus 3.0; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The HCV treatment prior to THA and TKA with undetectable viral load has been shown to be a key factor in mitigating postoperative complications, including joint infection. We noted that Black patients were more likely to undergo joint arthroplasty who did not receive treatment and with a PVL. While PVL rates decreased over time for both races, a significant gap persists for Black patients.

Comparison Between Orthopaedic Trauma Versus Arthroplasty Fellowship Training on Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify differences in patient characteristics, perioperative management methods, and outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture (FNF) when performed by orthopaedic surgeons who have arthroplasty versus orthopaedic trauma training. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective review of 636 patients who underwent THA for FNF between 2010 and 2019. There were 373 patients who underwent THA by an arthroplasty surgeon, and 263 who underwent THA by an orthopaedic trauma surgeon. Comorbidities, management methods, and outcomes were compared between patients operated on by orthopaedic surgeons who had arthroplasty versus trauma training. RESULTS: Arthroplasty-trained surgeons had shorter operative times (102 versus 128 minutes, P < .0001) and utilized tranexamic acid more frequently than trauma-trained surgeons (48.8 versus 18.6%, P < .0001). Orthopaedic trauma surgeons more frequently utilized an anterior approach. Patients of arthroplasty-trained surgeons had lower rates of complications including pulmonary embolism (1.6 versus 6.5%, P = .0019) and myocardial infarction (1.6 versus 11.0%, P < .0001). Similarly, patients of arthroplasty-trained surgeons were discharged faster (5.3 versus 7.9 days, P < .0001) with greater ambulation capacity (92.2 versus 57.2 feet, P < .0001). Dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and revision were similar between both groups. When adjusted for covariates, there was no difference in 90-day, 1-year, or 2-year mortality. CONCLUSION: A THA performed for FNF by arthroplasty surgeons was associated with lower in-hospital morbidities and improved functional statuses at discharge. However, mortalities and complications after discharge were similar between both specialties when adjusted for confounding variables. Optimization of protocols may further improve outcomes for THA for FNF.

Optimization of Orthopedic Surgical Instrument Trays: Lean Principles to Reduce Fixed Operating Room Expenses.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of surgical instrument trays improves efficiency and reduces cost. The purpose of this study is to assess the economic impact of optimizing orthopedic instrument trays at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Twenty-three independent orthopedic surgical instrument trays at a single academic hospital were reviewed from 2017 to 2018. Using Lean methodology, surgeons agreed upon the fewest number of instruments needed for each of the procedure trays. Instrument usage counts, cleaning times, room turnover times, tray weight, holes in tray wrapping, wet trays, and time invested to optimize each tray were tracked. Cost savings were calculated. Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: The mean instrument usage before and after Lean optimization was 23.4% and 54.2% (P < .0001). By Lean methods, 433 of 792 instruments (55%) were removed from 11 unique instrument trays (102 total trays), resulting in a reduction of 3520 instruments. Total weight reduction was 574.3 pounds (22%), ranging from 2.1-16.2 pounds per tray. The number of trays with wrapping holes decreased from 13 to 1 (P < .0001). The process of examining and removing instruments took an average of 7 minutes 35 seconds per tray. The calculated total annual savings was $270,976 (20% overall cost reduction). CONCLUSION: In addition to substantial cost savings, tray optimization decreases tray weights and cleaning times without negatively impacting turnover times. Lean methodology improves efficiency in instrument tray usage, and reduces hospital cost while encouraging surgeon and staff participation through continuous process improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Quality Improvement, Level III.

Does Surgeon Fellowship Training Influence Outcomes in Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes (90 days and 1 year) of patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing hemiarthroplasty by surgeons with different fellowship training: trauma, arthroplasty, and general orthopedics. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture from 2010 to 2018. Comorbidities, perioperative details, demographics, injury variables, and time-to-surgery were compared between the fellowship training cohorts, in addition to outcomes including dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and mortality at 90 days and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 298 hips with an average age of 77.8 years underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Arthroplasty surgeons had a significantly shorter operative duration (82 minutes, P = .0014) and utilized the anterior approach more frequently (P < .0001). The general orthopedists had a significantly increased total surgical complication risk compared to both the arthroplasty and trauma fellowship-trained cohorts at both 90 days (11.8% vs 1.6% vs 3.9%, P = .015) and 1 year (18.2% vs 4.9% vs 7.1%, P = .008). The overall mortality risk was 11.7% at 90 days and 22.8% at 1 year. When adjusted for covariates, including comorbidities, gender, age, and preoperative walking capacity, both the arthroplasty fellowship-trained cohort (odds ratio 0.381, 95% confidence interval 0.159-0.912, P = .030) and the general orthopedist cohort (odds ratio 0.495; 95% confidence interval 0.258-0.952, P = .035) had reduced risk of 1-year mortality compared to the trauma fellowship-trained cohort. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty performed for femoral neck fractures may result in fewer complications when performed by arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeons. An arthroplasty weekly on-call schedule and adjusted institutional protocols may be utilized to improve outcomes and reduce complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective cohort.

Inhospital Complications of Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgeons are wary of patients with neuromuscular (NM) diseases as a result of perceived poor outcomes and lack of data regarding complication risks. We determined the prevalence of patients with NM disease undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and characterized its relationship with in-hospital complications, prolonged length of stay, and total charges. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014 was used for this retrospective cohort study to identify 8,028,435 discharges with total joint arthroplasty. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify 91,420 patients who had discharge diagnoses for any of the NM disorders of interest: Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, cerebrovascular disease resulting in lower extremity paralysis, myotonic dystrophy, myasthenia gravis, myositis (dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion-body myositis), spinal muscular atrophy type III, poliomyelitis, spinal cord injury, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between NM disease and perioperative outcomes, including inpatient adverse events, length of stay, mortality, and hospital charges adjusted for demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: NM patients undergoing TJA had increased odds of total surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17 to 1.25; P < 0.0001), medical complications (OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.36 to 1.46; P < 0.0001), and overall complications (OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.36; P < 0.0001) compared with non-NM patients. Specifically, NM patients had increased odds of prosthetic complications (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.42; P = 0.003), wound dehiscence (OR = 5.00; 95% CI, 1.57 to 15.94; P = 0.0002), acute postoperative anemia (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.24; P < 0.0001), altered mental status (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 2.24 to 2.99; P < 0.0001), urinary tract infection (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.56; P < 0.0001), and deep vein thrombosis (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.58; P = 0.021). No difference of in-hospital mortality was observed (P = 0.155). DISCUSSION: Because more patients with NM disease become candidates of TJA, a team of neurologists, anesthesiologists, therapists, and orthopaedic surgeon is required to anticipate, prevent, and manage potential complications identified in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Cost Savings of Standardization of Thoracic Surgical Instruments: The Process of Lean.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to show the effect that standardization of surgical trays has on the number of instruments sterilized and on cost. METHODS: We reviewed our most commonly used surgical trays with the 3 general thoracic surgeons in our division and agreed upon the least number of surgical instruments needed for mediastinoscopy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, robotic thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy. RESULTS: We removed 59 of 79 instruments (75%) from the mediastinoscopy tray, 45 of 73 (62%) from the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery tray, 51 of 84 (61%) from the robotic tray, and 50 of 113 (44%) from the thoracotomy tray. From January 2016 to December 2016, the estimated savings by procedure were video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 398) $21,890, robotic tray (n = 231) $19,400, thoracotomy (n = 163) $15,648, and mediastinoscopy (n = 162) $12,474. Estimated total savings were $69,412. The weight of the trays was reduced 70%, and the nonsteamed sterilization rate (opened trays that needed to be reprocessed) decreased from 2% to 0%. None of the surgeons requested any of the removed instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of thoracic surgical trays is possible despite having multiple thoracic surgeons. This process of lean (the removal of nonvalue steps or equipment) reduces the number of instruments cleaned and carried and reduces cost. It may also reduce the incidence of "wet loads" that require the resterilization of instruments.