Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Contrast-Enhanced US Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024.

The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the imaging technique, reporting lexicon, disease categorization, and management for patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS encompasses HCC surveillance with US; HCC diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced US (CEUS); and treatment response assessment (TRA) with CT or MRI. LI-RADS was recently expanded to include CEUS TRA after nonradiation locoregional therapy or surgical resection. This report provides an overview of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024, including a lexicon of imaging findings, techniques, and imaging criteria for posttreatment tumor viability assessment. LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 takes into consideration differences in the CEUS appearance of viable tumor and posttreatment changes within and in close proximity to a treated lesion. Due to the high sensitivity of CEUS to vascular flow, posttreatment reactive changes commonly manifest as areas of abnormal perilesional enhancement without washout, especially in the first 3 months after treatment. To improve the accuracy of CEUS for nonradiation TRA, different diagnostic criteria are used to evaluate tumor viability within and outside of the treated lesion margin. Broader criteria for intralesional enhancement increase sensitivity for tumor viability detection. Stricter criteria for perilesional enhancement limit miscategorization of posttreatment reactive changes as viable tumor. Finally, the TRA algorithm reconciles intralesional and perilesional tumor viability assessment and assigns a single LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category: LR-TR nonviable, LR-TR equivocal, or LR-TR viable.

New Technologies in the Assessment of Carotid Stenosis: Beyond the Color-Doppler Ultrasound-High Frame Rate Vector-Flow and 3D Arterial Analysis Ultrasound.

Atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery is the main cause of ischemic stroke, with a high incidence rate among people over 65 years. A timely and precise diagnosis can help to prevent the ischemic event and decide patient management, such as follow up, medical, or surgical treatment. Presently, diagnostic imaging techniques available include color-Doppler ultrasound, as a first evaluation technique, computed tomography angiography, which, however, uses ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance angiography, still not in widespread use, and cerebral angiography, which is an invasively procedure reserved for therapeutically purposes. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is carving out an important and emerging role which can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of an ultrasound. Modern ultrasound technologies, still not universally utilized, are opening new horizons in the arterial pathologies research field. In this paper, the technical development of various carotid artery stenosis diagnostic imaging modalities and their impact on clinical efficacy is thoroughly reviewed.

Systemic cardiovascular complications in patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus: comprehensive assessment with whole-body magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography.

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease, myocardial infarctions, and cerebrovascular disease in patients with long-standing diabetes using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) combined with whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (WB-MRA) and to estimate the cumulative disease burden in a new MRA-based score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee and all patients gave informed written consent. Sixty-five patients with long-standing (>10 years) diabetes mellitus without acute symptoms were prospectively evaluated. The patients were clinically assessed and received WB-MRI/WB-MRA containing an examination of the brain, the heart, the arterial vessels (abdominal aorta, the supraaortic, renal, pelvic, and peripheral arteries), and the feet. Prevalence rates were calculated and compared with a healthy control group of 200 individuals after adjustment for age and sex by a logistic regression analysis using exact parameter estimates (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel-statistics). Finally, an MRA based vessel score (sum of grades of all evaluated vessels divided by the number of vessels; grades range from 1, normal, to 6, complete occlusion) indicative of atherosclerotic disease burden was created for this study. This vessel score's association with clinical and biochemical parameters (age, sex, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, body mass index, blood pressure, smoking, coronary artery disease-status, retinopathy, serum creatinine, hemoglobin A1c test, low density lipoprotein-concentration, medication) was assessed with an age and sex adjusted analysis (generalized linear model). RESULTS: In the diabetic patients, we found prevalence rates of 49% for peripheral artery disease, 25% for myocardial infarction, 28% for cerebrovascular disease, and 22% for neuropathic foot disease. In all vascular beds, at least 50% of the pathologies were previously unknown. Myocardial infarction (P= 0.0002), chronic ischemic cerebral lesions (P = 0.0008), and atherosclerotic disease were significantly more common in diabetic than in control subjects (internal carotid artery: P = 0.006, vertebral artery: P = 0.009, intracerebral vessels: P = 0.02, superficial femoral artery: P = 0.006, anterior tibial artery: P = 0.01, posterior tibial artery: P = 0.02, fibular artery: 0.003). The WB-MRI/WB-MRA-based score showed a significant association with age (P = 0.0008), male sex (P = 0.03), nephropathy (P = 0.006), diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.007), and coronary artery disease status (P = 0.006). Body mass index, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c test, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and medications showed no significant association with the score. CONCLUSIONS: Using WB-MRI combined with WB-MRA we found a high prevalence of occult atherosclerotic disease in long-standing diabetic patients. This study shows that the true atherosclerotic burden in these patients is largely underestimated.