Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Hepatology ; 78(1): 195-211, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924031

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of simple, noninvasive tests (NITs) in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an individual patient data meta-analysis of 1780 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and T2D. The index tests of interest were FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography, and AGILE 3+. The target conditions were advanced fibrosis, NASH, and fibrotic NASH(NASH plus F2-F4 fibrosis). The diagnostic performance of noninvasive tests. individually or in sequential combination, was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and by decision curve analysis. Comparison with 2278 NAFLD patients without T2D was also made. In NAFLD with T2D LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed, both NFS and FIB-4 for advanced fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve:LSM 0.82, AGILE 3+ 0.82, NFS 0.72, FIB-4 0.75, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index 0.68; p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests), with an uncertainty area of 12%-20%. The combination of serum-based with LSM-based tests for advanced fibrosis led to a reduction of 40%-60% in necessary LSM tests. Decision curve analysis showed that all scores had a modest net benefit for ruling out advanced fibrosis at the risk threshold of 5%-10% of missing advanced fibrosis. LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for fibrotic NASH (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve:LSM 0.79, AGILE 3+ 0.77, NFS 0.71, FIB-4 0.71; p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests). All noninvasive scores were suboptimal for diagnosing NASH. CONCLUSIONS: LSM and AGILE 3+ individually or in low availability settings in sequential combination after FIB-4 or NFS have a similar good diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic NASH in NAFLD patients with T2D.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Humanos , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/patologia , Fibrose , Gravidade do Paciente , Curva ROC , Biópsia , Aspartato Aminotransferases
2.
Hepatol Res ; 42(5): 515-22, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22502745

RESUMO

AIM: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to assess liver disease severity non-invasively by observing intra- and extrahepatic hemodynamic changes. Transit times are calculated to include intra- and extrahepatic components (hepatic vein transit time, HVTT) or the intrahepatic component (hepatic transit time, HTT), but these have not been compared directly. We aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy of HVTT and HTT in gauging the severity of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability. METHODS: Recorded ultrasound scans performed on 75 patients with biopsy-staged CHC, using the microbubble contrast agent Sonovue were analyzed. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy of HTT and HVTT for diagnosis of cirrhosis was 0.78 and 0.71 (P = 0.24). Diagnostic accuracy of HTT and HVTT for diagnosis of fibrosis stage >2 was 0.76 and 0.72 (P = 0.23). Negative predictive value for cirrhosis using this cut-off was high for both techniques (HVTT, 88%; HTT, 92%), suggesting utility for exclusion of cirrhosis. Inter-observer reliability for HTT and HVTT were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Intra-observer reliability for HTT and HVTT were 0.98 and 0.99. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, reliability exceeded 90% while diagnostic accuracy was in keeping with previous studies of microbubble transit time analysis. Despite higher numerical diagnostic accuracy for HTT, no significant difference was demonstrated between the techniques, suggesting that both methods can be used reliably.

3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 27(8): 1281-92, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22432836

RESUMO

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NALFD) is a burgeoning global health problem, and the assessment of disease severity remains a clinical challenge. Conventional imaging and clinical blood tests are frequently unable to determine disease activity (the degree of inflammatory change) and fibrotic severity, while the applicability of histological examination of liver biopsy is limited. Imaging platforms provide liver-specific structural information, while newer applications of these technologies non-invasively exploit the physical and chemical characteristics of liver tissue in health and disease. In this review, conventional and newer imaging-based techniques for the assessment of inflammation and fibrosis in NAFLD are discussed in terms of diagnostic accuracy, radio-pathological correlations, and practical considerations. In particular, recent clinical studies of ultrasound (US)-based and magnetic resonance elastography techniques are evaluated, while the potential of contrast-enhanced US and magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques is discussed. The development and application of these techniques is starting to reduce the clinical need for liver biopsy, to produce surrogate end-points for interventional and observational clinical studies, and through this, to provide new insights into the natural history of NAFLD.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem , Fígado Gorduroso/diagnóstico , Hepatite/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Fígado , Biópsia , Meios de Contraste , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade , Fígado Gorduroso/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado Gorduroso/metabolismo , Fígado Gorduroso/patologia , Hepatite/diagnóstico por imagem , Hepatite/metabolismo , Hepatite/patologia , Humanos , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/metabolismo , Fígado/patologia , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Cirrose Hepática/metabolismo , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Radiografia , Cintilografia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 12(22): 3461-5, 2006 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16773702

RESUMO

Patients who are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus often develop chronic liver disease and assessment of the severity of liver injury is required prior to considering viral eradication therapy. This article examines the various assessment methods currently available from gold standard liver biopsy to serological markers and imaging. Ultrasound is one of the most widely used imaging modalities in clinical practice and is already a first-line diagnostic tool for liver disease. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents allow higher resolution images to be obtained and functional assessments of microvascular change to be carried out. The role of these agents in quantifying the state of hepatic injury is discussed as a viable method of determining the stage and grade of liver disease in patients with hepatitis C. Although currently confined to specialist centres, the availability of microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound will inevitably increase in the clinical setting.


Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Hepatopatias/etiologia , Microbolhas , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA