Early Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Analysis of Neurological Outcomes and Health Care Costs.

BACKGROUND: The timing of surgical resection is controversial when managing ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and varies considerably among centers. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes and hospital costs associated with delayed treatment in a ruptured cerebral AVM patient cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment for a ruptured cerebral AVM (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent emergent treatment of a ruptured AVM because of acute herniation were excluded, as were those treated >180 days after rupture. Patients were stratified by the timing of surgical intervention relative to AVM rupture into early (postbleed days 1-20) and delayed (postbleed days 21-180) treatment cohorts. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were identified. The early treatment cohort comprised 75 (86%) patients. The mean (SD) length of time between AVM rupture and surgical resection was 5 (5) days in the early cohort and 73 (60) days in the delayed cohort ( P < .001). The cohorts did not differ with respect to patient demographics, AVM size, Spetzler-Martin grade, frequency of preoperative embolization, or severity of clinical presentation ( P ≥ .15). Follow-up neurological status was equivalent between the cohorts ( P = .65). The associated mean health care costs were higher in the delayed treatment cohort ($241 597 [$99 363]) than in the early treatment cohort ($133 989 [$110 947]) ( P = .02). After adjustment for length of stay, each day of delayed treatment increased cost by a mean of $2465 (95% CI = $967-$3964, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Early treatment of ruptured AVMs was associated with significantly lower health care costs than delayed treatment, but surgical and neurological outcomes were equivalent.

Nationwide Readmission Rates and Hospital Charges for Patients With Surgical Evacuation of Nontraumatic Subdural Hematomas: Part 2-Burr Hole Craniostomy.

BACKGROUND: Nontraumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common neurological disease that causes extensive morbidity and mortality. Craniotomy or burr hole craniostomy (BHC) is indicated for symptomatic lesions, but both are associated with high recurrence rates. Although extensive research exists on postoperative complications after BHCs, few studies have examined the underlying causes and predictors of unplanned 30-day hospital readmissions at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To compare causes for hospital readmission within 30 days after surgical SDH evacuation with BHC and evaluate readmission rates and independent predictors of readmission. METHODS: This retrospective cohort observational study was designed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. We identified patients who had undergone BHC for SDH evacuation (2010-2015). National estimates and variances within the cohort were calculated after stratifying, hospital clustering, and weighting variables. RESULTS: We analyzed 2753 patients who had BHC for SDH evacuation: 675 (24.5%) had at least one 30-day readmission. Annual readmission rates did not vary across the study period ( P = .60). The most common cause of readmission was recurrent SDH (n = 630, 93.3%), and the next most common was postoperative infection (n = 12, 1.8%). Comorbidities significantly associated with readmission included fluid and electrolyte disorders, chronic blood loss anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, liver disease, and psychosis ( P ≤ .04), but statistically significant independent predictors for readmission included only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and fluid and electrolyte disorders ( P ≤ .007). CONCLUSION: These national trends in 30-day readmission rates after nontraumatic SDH evacuation by BHC not otherwise published provide quality benchmarks that can aid national quality improvement efforts.

Health Care Expenditures Associated with Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The additional hospital costs associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) have not been well investigated in prior literature. In this study, the total hospital cost of DCI in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemmorhage (aSAH) patients treated at a single quaternary center was analyzed. METHODS: All patients in the Post-Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial treated for an aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. DCI was defined as cerebral infarction identified on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or autopsy after exclusion of procedure-related infarctions. The primary outcome was the difference in total cost (including hospital, discharge facility, and all follow-up) using a propensity-adjusted analysis. Propensity score covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis included age, sex, open versus endovascular treatment, Hunt and Hess score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. RESULTS: Of the 391 patients included, 144 (37%) had DCI. Patients with DCI had a significantly greater cost compared to patients without DCI (mean standard deviation $112,081 [$54,022] vs. $86,159 [$38,817]; P < 0.001) and a significantly greater length of stay (21 days [11] vs. 18 days [8], P = 0.003, respectively). In propensity-adjusted linear regression analysis, both DCI (odds ratio, $13,871; 95% confidence interval, $7558-$20,185; P < 0.001) and length of stay (odds ratio, $3815 per day; 95% confidence interval, $3480-$4149 per day; P < 0.001) were found to significantly increase the cost. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher costs associated with DCI further support the evidence that adverse effects associated with DCI in aSAH pose a significant burden to the health care system.

Nationwide Readmission Rates and Hospital Charges for Patients With Surgical Evacuation of Nontraumatic Subdural Hematomas: Part 1-Craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Despite patients experiencing high recurrence and readmission rates after surgical management of nontraumatic subdural hematomas (SDHs), few studies have examined the causes and predictors of unplanned readmissions in this population on a national scale. OBJECTIVE: To analyze independent factors predicting 30-day hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of nontraumatic SDH in patients who survived their index surgery and evaluate hospital readmission rates and charges. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified patients who underwent craniotomy for nontraumatic SDH evacuation (2010-2015) using a retrospective cohort observational study design. National estimates and variances within the cohort were calculated after stratifying, hospital clustering, and weighting variables. RESULTS: Among 49 013 patients, 10 643 (21.7%) had at least 1 readmission within 30 days of their index treatment and 38 370 (78.3%) were not readmitted. Annual readmission rates did not change during the study period ( P = .74). The most common primary causes of 30-day readmissions were recurrent SDH (n = 3949, 37.1%), venous thromboembolism (n = 1373, 12.9%), and delayed hyponatremia and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (n = 1363, 12.8%). Comorbidities that independently predicted readmission included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, lymphoma, fluid and electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancer, peripheral vascular disease, psychosis, and renal failure ( P ≤ .03). Household income in the 51st to 75th percentile was associated with a decreased risk of readmission. CONCLUSION: National trends in 30-day readmission rates after nontraumatic SDH treatment by craniotomy provide quality benchmarks that can be used to drive quality improvement efforts on a national level.

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window.

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

Total 1-year hospital cost of middle meningeal artery embolization compared to surgery for chronic subdural hematomas: a propensity-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization results in fewer treatment failures than surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). We compared the total 1-year hospital cost for MMA embolization versus surgical evacuation for patients with cSDH. METHODS: Data for patients who presented with cSDHs from January 1, 2018, through May 31, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped by initial treatment (surgery vs MMA embolization), and total hospital cost was obtained. A propensity-adjusted analysis was performed. The primary outcome was difference in mean hospital cost between treatments. RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 48 (28%) underwent embolization and 122 (72%) underwent surgery. cSDHs were larger in the surgical (20.5 (6.7) mm) than in the embolization group (16.9 (4.6) mm; P<0.001); and index hospital length of stay was longer in the surgical group (9.8 (7.0) days) than in the embolization group (5.7 (2.4) days; P<0.001). More patients required additional hematoma treatment in the surgical cohort (16%) than in the embolization cohort (4%; P=0.03), and more required readmission in the surgical cohort (28%) than in the embolization cohort (13%; P=0.04). After propensity adjustment, MMA embolization was associated with a lower total hospital cost compared to surgery (mean difference -$32 776; 95% CI -$52 766 to -$12 787; P<0.001). A propensity-adjusted linear regression analysis found that unexpected additional treatment was the only significant contributor to total hospital cost (mean difference $96 357; 95% CI $73 886 to $118 827; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MMA embolization is associated with decreased total hospital cost compared with surgery for cSDHs. This lower cost is directly related to the decreased need for additional treatment interventions.

Access to Neurosurgery in the Era of Narrowing Insurance Networks: Statewide Analysis of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Marketplace Plans in Arizona.

OBJECTIVE: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to expand access to health care for 46 million uninsured Americans. Increasing consumer coverage and ensuring affordability of care have raised concerns about ACA Marketplace plans with limited in-network physician coverage (narrow network plans). We assessed the neurosurgery coverage of ACA Marketplace plans in Arizona. METHODS: The Health Insurance Marketplace website was used to identify ACA Marketplace plans in Arizona. Plan-specific details were examined to search for in-network neurosurgeons (2016-2019). Physician- and patient-level information was obtained using Intellimed health care databases, which provide specific neurosurgery diagnosis-related group information. RESULTS: Although 5 insurance providers offered plans on the ACA Marketplace in Arizona, only 1 plan was available in 13 of 15 counties (87%). Evaluation of in-network coverage found that all in-network outpatient neurosurgery providers are in 5 of 15 counties (33%). Most of the other counties (9 of 10) have neurosurgery facilities, but do not have in-network access to neurosurgical care within the county (∼1.1 million people or 15% of the state population). CONCLUSIONS: By narrowing the network of providers, insurance companies are attempting to maintain fiscal viability of their ACA Marketplace products. However, 10 of the 15 counties (67%) in Arizona do not have access to outpatient neurosurgical care through these plans despite the presence of neurosurgical facilities in most counties. Access to neurosurgical care requires consideration of network coverage in policies designed to expand coverage and coverage options for patients insured through the ACA Marketplace.

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: Transradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions. METHODS: Elective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access. RESULTS: Of the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI -$4931 to -$97; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Neuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

Adding insult to injury: discontinuous insurance following spine trauma.

BACKGROUND: Spine trauma patients may represent a group for whom insurance fails to provide protection from catastrophic medical expenses, resulting in the transfer of financial burden onto individual families and public payers. This study compares the rate of insurance discontinuation for patients who underwent surgery for traumatic spine injury with and without spinal cord injury with the rate for matched control subjects. METHODS: We used the MarketScan database to perform a retrospective cohort study of privately insured spine trauma patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the time to insurance discontinuation. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to determine hazard ratios for insurance discontinuation among spine trauma patients compared with the matched control population. RESULTS: The median duration of existing insurance coverage was 20.2 months for those with traumatic spinal cord injury, 25.6 months for those with traumatic spine injury without spinal cord injury, and 48.0 months for the matched control cohort (log-rank p < 0.0001). After controlling for multiple covariates, the hazard ratios for discontinuation of insurance were 2.02 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.83 to 2.23) and 2.78 (95% CI, 2.31 to 3.35) for the trauma patients without and with spinal cord injury, respectively, compared with matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of insurance discontinuation are significantly higher for trauma patients with severe spine injury compared with the uninjured population, indicating that patients with disabling injuries are at increased risk for loss of insurance coverage.