Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(4): 948-955, 2023 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37734094

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) and race with developing pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) after sexually transmitted infection (STI) among female adolescents and young adults in Maryland. METHODS: We used Maryland statewide hospital claims data (outpatient and inpatient visits) for this retrospective cohort study. Female adolescents and young adults aged 15-24 years who had at least one STI from July 1, 2013, to March 31, 2015, were included. A participant entered the cohort on the date of the first STI diagnosis and was followed up until PID occurrence or 3 years after the first STI. Median household income of the participant's residential ZIP code tabulation area was used as the neighborhood-level SES. Discrete-time hazard models were used to estimate the hazard of PID. RESULTS: Of the 2,873 participants, 88.5% were of Black race, and 67.2% were aged 20-24 years. The hazard of PID after an STI among Black women was 1.40 times that of White women (95% CI 1.06-1.85). After adjustment for age, insurance type, and number of STI events, the hazard ratio (HR) did not change. However, adding neighborhood-level SES to the model attenuated the disparity in PID after STI between Black and White women (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.67). CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in PID diagnosis are mitigated by neighborhood-level SES.


Assuntos
Doença Inflamatória Pélvica , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/epidemiologia , Status Econômico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(3): 417.e1-417.e8, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32135143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence rates of sexually transmitted infections in the United States highlight the need for concurrent treatment of patients and their sexual partners. Expedited partner therapy allows healthcare providers to offer antibiotic prescriptions or medications to an index patient for distribution to their sexual partner(s) without evaluating the partner. We hypothesized that there was a gap between expedited partner therapy policy at the state level and its downstream implementation by community pharmacists. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to evaluate pharmacists' expedited partner therapy knowledge and practices in 41 expedited partner therapy-permissible US states, to determine whether there were differences in practice based on the length of time expedited partner therapy was permissible in the state and chlamydia incidence rates, and to measure the cost of expedited partner therapy treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized cohort of pharmacists (n=335) was invited to complete a telephone interview from November 2017 through January 2018. Descriptive statistics were calculated and stratified by early, mid, and late expedited partner therapy-adopter status based on the year of the state's expedited partner therapy enactment and the state's chlamydia incidence rate. Fisher's exact test and 1-way analyses of variance were used to compare measures across strata. RESULTS: We had 143 pharmacists (42.7%) agree to complete the survey. Among our respondents, 40.6% (n=58/143) indicated that they were aware of expedited partner therapy; 14.7% (n=21/143) reported that they had ever received an expedited partner therapy prescription, and 97% (n=139/143) reported that they would dispense an expedited partner therapy prescription if they received 1 in the future. These findings were stable across the 6 strata defined by early, mid, or late expedited partner therapy-adopter and high or low incidence rates of chlamydia status. Mean cost of azithromycin 1000 mg and cefixime 400 mg for treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea was $22.17 (95% confidence interval, 20.29-24.05) and $30.46 (95% confidence interval, 28.65-32.26), respectively. CONCLUSION: Fewer than one-half of the pharmacists were aware of expedited partner therapy. A small minority of pharmacists reported ever having received an expedited partner therapy prescription, regardless of the length of time expedited partner therapy had been legal in their states and the incidence of chlamydia. However, almost all pharmacists reported that they would dispense an expedited partner therapy prescription if they received 1. Additionally, costs were high for expedited partner therapy for self-pay patients. These data suggest that there are opportunities to increase expedited partner therapy utilization by healthcare providers, patients, and pharmacists.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Farmacêuticos , Parceiros Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Law Med Ethics ; 47(1): 152-160, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994076

RESUMO

To help eliminate perinatal HIV transmission, the US Department of Health and Human Services recommends against breastfeeding for women living with HIV, regardless of viral load or combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) status. However, cART radically improves HIV prognosis and virtually eliminates perinatal transmission, and breastfeeding's health benefits are well-established. In this setting, pregnancy is increasing among American women with HIV, and a harm reduction approach to those who breastfeed despite extensive counseling is suggested. We assess the evidence and ethical justification for current policy, with attention to pertinent racial and health disparities. We first review perinatal transmission and breastfeeding data relevant to US infants. We compare hypothetical risk of HIV transmission from breastmilk to increased mortality from sudden infant death syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis from avoiding breastfeeding, finding that benefits may outweigh risks if mothers maintain undetectable viral load on cART. We then review maternal health considerations. We conclude that avoidance of breastfeeding by women living with HIV may not maximize health outcomes and discuss our recommendation for revising national guidelines in light of autonomy, harm reduction and health inequities.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Redução do Dano , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mães/psicologia , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 133(3): 416-422, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741802

RESUMO

Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, have reached record high rates in the United States. Sexually transmitted infections disproportionately affect reproductive-aged females aged 15-44 years, who account for 65% and 42% of the total reported C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae cases, respectively. Undiagnosed STIs can result in serious health complications that put women at an increased risk for pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal factor infertility. Many of these women are seen by physicians (eg, obstetrician-gynecologists, family medicine doctors, pediatricians) or other clinicians (eg, nurse practitioners, midwives, physician assistants) who care for women. These clinicians have the opportunity to help curb the continued increase in STI incidence rates with the implementation and use of expedited partner therapy. Expedited partner therapy is a proven effective health care practice that allows clinicians to give patients medications or prescriptions to distribute to their partners. Despite expedited partner therapy's proven effectiveness, there are barriers to its implementation that must be understood to enhance STI treatment and prevention efforts. In this commentary, we discuss these barriers, and appeal to women's health clinicians to implement or increase use of expedited partner therapy for the treatment of women with STIs and their sexual partners.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/transmissão , Busca de Comunicante , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/transmissão , Antibacterianos/economia , Infecções por Chlamydia/prevenção & controle , Revelação , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Gonorreia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Parceiros Sexuais , Saúde da Mulher
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA