Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 32(11): 736-41, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24140026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the procedures related to mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit setting: allocation of ventilators, team education, maintenance and reference documents. STUDY DESIGN: Declarative survey. METHODS: Between September and December 2010, we assessed the assignment and types of ventilators (ICU ventilators, temporary repair ventilators, non-invasive ventilators [NIV], and transportation ventilators), medical and nurse education, maintenance of the ventilators, presence of reference documents. Results are expressed in median/range and proportions. RESULTS: Among the 62 participating ICUs, a median of 15 ventilators/ICU (range 1-50) was reported with more than one trademark in 47 (76%) units. Specific ventilators were used for NIV in 22 (35%) units, temporary repair in 49 (79%) and transportation in all the units. Nurse education courses were given by ICU physicians in 54 (87%) units or by a company in 29 (47%) units. Medical education courses were made by ICU senior physicians in 55 (89%) units or by a company in 21 (34%) units. These courses were organized occasionally in 24 (39%) ICU and bi-annually in 16 (26%) units. Maintenance procedures were made by the ICU staff in 39 (63%) units, dedicated staff (17 [27%]) or bioengineering technicians (14 [23%] ICU). Reference documents were written for maintenance procedures in 48 (77%) units, ventilator setup in 22 (35%) units and ventilator dysfunction in 20 (32%) ICU. CONCLUSIONS: This first survey shows disparate distribution of ventilators and practices among French ICU. Education and understanding of the proper use of ventilators are key issues for security improvement.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Documentação , Educação Médica , Educação Médica Continuada , Falha de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , França , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Engenharia e Manutenção/economia , Ventilação não Invasiva/instrumentação , Ventilação não Invasiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Médicos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 28(9): 735-42, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19713066

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of satisfaction in terms of pain relief and comfort among patients receiving different postoperative analgesia protocols after hand surgery under regional anaesthesia in a day care unit. METHODS: Cohort study among patients after hand surgery under regional anaesthesia during two consecutive three months time periods, with patient stratification according to the expected pain level with different balanced analgesia protocols (group A: carpal tunnel, group B: other surgery without bone involvement, group C: bone surgery). A telephone survey, scoring analgesia and comfort, each with a numerical (0-10) scale was conducted on days 1 and 7. During the first period analgesia for groups A and B was the same (acetaminophen-dextropropoxyphene or acetaminophen-codeine) and group C patients were treated with acetaminophen-ketoprofen-tramadol. In the second period analgesia was reduced for group A (acetaminophen alone) and increased for group B (acetaminophen-ketoprofen-tramadol) and group C (duration increased from 3 to 7 days). RESULTS: For carpal tunnel surgery, analgesia with acetaminophen alone was efficient, (Pain scale [PS] d0=2[0-10], PS d1=1 [0-10] and PS d2-d4=0,5 [0-10]). This surgery does not elicit important pain, there is no benefit in adding other analgesics. For group B, a significant improvement in postoperative pain was observed (postoperative d1 p<0.03) with a major increase in side effects (2/57 vs 17/48 p<0.001). For group C, therapeutic changes were ineffective (PS d0=2 vs 3.5 et PS d1=3 vs 5 [NS]) and we noticed an increase in side effects (p<0.05). One third of all patients are totally satisfied on day 7, logistic regression showing the role of inefficient analgesia in late postoperative period (PS>2 between d2-d4). Between day 1 and day 7, 20% of the patients change their point of view, those who feel less satisfied on day 7 complained of a more severe postoperative pain between day 2 and 4 (p<0.001) and between day 5-7 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: For hand surgery on day case, quality of late postoperative analgesia (day 2-day 7) is strongly related to patient's satisfaction on day 7.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Mãos/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Satisfação do Paciente , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Codeína/administração & dosagem , Codeína/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Dextropropoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Dextropropoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/administração & dosagem , Cetoprofeno/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Periósteo/cirurgia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Tramadol/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA