RESUMO
Assertive community treatment is known for improving consumer outcomes, but is difficult to implement. On-site fidelity measurement can help ensure model adherence, but is costly in large systems. This study compared reliability and validity of three methods of fidelity assessment (on-site, phone-administered, and expert-scored self-report) using a stratified random sample of 32 mental health intensive case management teams from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Overall, phone, and to a lesser extent, expert-scored self-report fidelity assessments compared favorably to on-site methods in inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. If used appropriately, these alternative protocols hold promise in monitoring large-scale program fidelity with limited resources.
Assuntos
Administração de Caso/normas , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/normas , Transtornos Mentais/reabilitação , Estudos Transversais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato , Telefone , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between shared decision making and consumers' illness management skills and consumer-provider relationships. METHODS: Medication management appointments for 79 consumers were audio recorded. Independent coders rated overall shared decision making, minimum level of shared decision making, and consumer-provider agreement for 63 clients whose visit included a treatment decision. Mental health diagnoses, medication adherence, patient activation, illness management, working alliance, and length of consumer-provider relationships were also assessed. Correlation analyses were used to determine relationships among measures. RESULTS: Overall shared decision making was not associated with any variables. Minimum levels of shared decision making were associated with higher scores on the bond subscale of the Working Alliance Inventory, indicating a higher degree of liking and trust, and with better medication adherence. Agreement was associated with shorter consumer-provider relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer-provider relationships and shared decision making might have a more nuanced association than originally thought.