Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Cancer J ; 26(4): 292-297, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732671

RESUMO

Modern medical costs fall beyond most peoples' ability to pay and cause severe adverse effects that impact patients and families. It is time to team up with all stakeholders to provide solutions to systemic issues that thwart oncology's true goal to help patients survive their care and their cancer. Patients need realistic approaches that include (1) access to affordable treatments, (2) accountability and oversight toward patient costs and results in research, and (3) cost-effective drug supply once commercialized. Physicians play a critical role helping patients develop a plan that fits each person's medical, financial, and life situation.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/normas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economia , Humanos
2.
Am J Public Health ; 103(9): 1685-92, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23409875

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We used results generated from the first study of the National Institutes of Health Sentinel Network to understand health concerns and perceptions of research among underrepresented groups such as women, the elderly, racial/ethnic groups, and rural populations. METHODS: Investigators at 5 Sentinel Network sites and 2 community-focused national organizations developed a common assessment tool used by community health workers to assess research perceptions, health concerns, and conditions. RESULTS: Among 5979 individuals assessed, the top 5 health concerns were hypertension, diabetes, cancer, weight, and heart problems; hypertension was the most common self-reported condition. Levels of interest in research participation ranged from 70.1% among those in the "other" racial/ethnic category to 91.0% among African Americans. Overall, African Americans were more likely than members of other racial/ethnic groups to be interested in studies requiring blood samples (82.6%), genetic samples (76.9%), or medical records (77.2%); staying overnight in a hospital (70.5%); and use of medical equipment (75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Top health concerns were consistent across geographic areas. African Americans reported more willingness to participate in research even if it required blood samples or genetic testing.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação da Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 20(15): 3328-43, 2002 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12149307

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based technology assessment of chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibition, and fenretinide. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. VALUES: More weight was given to published randomized trials. BENEFITS/HARMS: A woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk reduction strategies is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer- and noncancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected breast cancer risk of > or= 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. Risk/benefit models suggest that greatest clinical benefit with least side effects is derived from use of tamoxifen in younger (premenopausal) women (who are less likely to have thromboembolic sequelae and uterine cancer), women without a uterus, and women at higher breast cancer risk. Data do not as yet suggest that tamoxifen provides an overall health benefit or increases survival. In all circumstances, tamoxifen use should be discussed as part of an informed decision-making process with careful consideration of individually calculated risks and benefits. Use of tamoxifen combined with hormone replacement therapy or use of raloxifene, any aromatase inhibitor or inactivator, or fenretinide to lower the risk of developing breast cancer is not recommended outside of a clinical trial setting. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process and recommendations will be updated in a timely matter. VALIDATION: The conclusions were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Aromatase , Neoplasias da Mama/enzimologia , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapêutico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Prova Pericial , Feminino , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA