International Consensus Results: Development of Practice Guidelines for Assessment of Peristomal Body and Stoma Profiles, Patient Engagement, and Patient Follow-up.

Evidence indicates that a common problem for the person with an ostomy is pouch leakage and the development of peristomal skin irritation, which can negatively affect quality of life. While it is clear that the pouching system seal leakage can cause profound problems for the person with an ostomy, little information is available on interventions that focus on leakage. To address this gap, an international group of ostomy nurse experts was convened to develop consensus-based practice guidelines to assist ostomy nurses in determining the best pouching system for the patient. The outcomes of these guidelines for the person with a stoma are to decrease leakage and increase security and confidence leading to an increased quality of life. A large-scale Modified Delphi Consensus-Building Process was used to identify key factors in assessing body and stoma profiles to determine the best pouching system. The resulting consensus provides practice guidelines on how to assess body and stoma profiles, engage and educate patients, and when to follow up with patients after hospital discharge or product change.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Variances in Ostomy Skin Conditions and the Economic Impact (ADVOCATE Trial).

PURPOSE: To compare ostomy-related costs and incidence of peristomal skin complications (PSCs) for ceramide-infused ostomy skin barriers and control skin barriers. DESIGN: The ADVOCATE trial is a multi-centered randomized controlled trial, and double-blinded international study with an adaptive design. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 153 adults from 25 sites from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Participants were seen in hospital and outpatient care settings. METHODS: Data were collected by investigators at each site during face-to-face visits and during telephone check-in calls between visits. Cost of care data were collected using a questionnaire developed specifically for the study. The peristomal skin was assessed using the Ostomy Skin Tool. Health-related quality of life was measured using the SF-12v2. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using a patient-centered study-specific questionnaire. Cost of care was analyzed via analysis of covariance comparing total cost of care for 12 weeks between the 2 groups. The incidence of PSC was analyzed via Barnard's exact test comparing the incidence of PSCs between the control and treatment groups. Tertiary outcomes were exploratory in nature and not statistically powered. RESULTS: Use of the ceramide-infused barrier significantly reduced stoma-related cost of care over a 12-week period, resulting in a $36.46 decrease in cost (14% relative decrease). The adjusted average costs were $223.73 in the treatment group and $260.19 in the control group (P = .017). The overall incidence of PSCs in the study was 47.7%; PSC incidence was 40.5% for the treatment group versus 55.4% for controls (P = .069, 95% confidence interval of the difference: -1.2 to 30.4). Significantly more participants using the ceramide-infused skin barrier were "very satisfied" with barrier performance (75% vs 55%; P = .033), prevention of leakage (63% vs 38%; P < .01), and prevention of itching (53% vs 31%; P = .016). General postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life was noted in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a ceramide-infused barrier significantly decreased cost and increased satisfaction with patient-reported outcomes.

Costs of an ostomy self-management training program for cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: To measure incremental expenses to an oncologic surgical practice for delivering a community-based, ostomy nurse-led, small-group, behavior skills-training intervention to help bladder and colorectal cancer survivors understand and adjust to their ostomies and improve their health-related quality of life, as well as assist family caregivers to understand survivors' needs and provide appropriate supportive care. METHODS: The intervention was a 5-session group behavior skills training in ostomy self-management following the principles of the Chronic Care Model. Faculty included Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses (WOCNs) using an ostomy care curriculum. A gender-matched peer-in-time buddy was assigned to each ostomy survivor. The 4-session survivor curriculum included the following: self-management practice and solving immediate ostomy concerns; social well-being; healthy lifestyle; and a booster session. The single family caregiver session was coled by a WOCN and an ostomy peer staff member and covered relevant caregiver and ostomate support issues. Each cohort required 8 weeks to complete the intervention. Nonlabor inputs included ostomy supplies, teaching materials, automobile mileage for WOCNs, mailing, and meeting space rental. Intervention personnel were employed by the University of Arizona. Labor expenses included salaries and fringe benefits. RESULTS: The total incremental expense per intervention cohort of 4 survivors was $7246 or $1812 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: A WOCN-led group self-help ostomy survivorship intervention provided affordable, effective, care to cancer survivors with ostomies.

Doctoral education for WOC nurses considering advanced practice nursing.

Advanced practice nursing education is at a crossroads. Societal changes, increased health care demands, and leadership nursing organizations have identified the need of a doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree as the advanced practice degree. WOC nurses need to examine DNP programs when considering returning for an advanced practice degree. This article explores nursing education at the doctorate level and areas the WOC nurse should consider when making a decision about attending a program. The WOC nurse needs to understand the similarities and differences of the doctor of philosophy and the DNP, issues about each program and its completion, personal factors, and the application process. Although selecting a doctoral program is a daunting experience, the education will provide opportunities for the WOC nurse to excel as a scholar, thus influencing the profession and the practice.

Survey of wound, ostomy and continence (WOC) nurse clinicians on stomal and peristomal complications: a content validation study.

PURPOSE: Validated and reliable stomal and peristomal complication definitions and associated interventions are lacking. Available literature is either narrowly medically focused or only of case study level. The objectives of this study were to establish content validation data for the proposed stomal and peristomal complication definitions and their associated interventions, to obtain the data related to contact with stomal and peristomal complication patients, and to gain insight into the ostomy care process. METHODS: A researcher-designed survey was sent to 2900 expert Wound, Ostomy and Continence nurse clinicians via a national mailing to a representative nonrandomized sample of participants who identified that they included ostomy care in their professional practice. In total, 686 nurses returned the survey, a response rate of 24%. The purposive sample was asked to quantify the degree of validity of the survey's stated stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions. Hand-written qualitative comments of the participants were transcribed, analyzed, and themes were derived. RESULTS: On a scale of 1 to 4, the mean score for all definitions and interventions was 3.64 (SD=0.30). The overall survey's content validity index was .91. Ratings demonstrated high consensus validation on the stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions, with definitions scoring higher. The mean scores and the content validity index results on selected items were slightly lower for interventions, especially stomal interventions. Qualitative analysis of participants' comments about the whole instrument generated 10 themes and associated subthemes related to omitted complications and interventions and general observations about the ostomy care process and the validation research process. CONCLUSION: The proposed stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions were rated as generally valid. Further research documenting validation of participants' comments is necessary. Given the findings, additional complications and interventions not identified in the literature were noted and need to be further scrutinized and researched.

Care of the obese patient with an ostomy.

Obesity has become the number one health problem in the United States. The patients who is obese and undergoing a surgical procedure that results in the formation of fecal or urinary diversion requires advanced skills of a multidisciplinary healthcare team. Patients who are obese carry a high risk of wound and cardiopulmonary complications and often present a serious challenge in terms of stoma creation and management. The purpose of this article is to examine the risk factors that face the patient who is obese and undergoing stoma surgery, the challenges of stoma creation, and the resultant stoma management problems.

Preparing a grant proposal--Part 5: Organization and revision.

Translating a research idea into a well-written grant proposal takes planning and commitment. This Spotlight is the fifth in a series by the members of the Center for Clinical Investigation (CCI) of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses (WOCN) Society. The aim of this series is to facilitate high-quality grant writing and encourage submissions to WOCN's grants program. This article provides guidance on the development of a grant proposal and the revisions necessary to result in a polished final product.

Descriptive study of peristomal complications.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess new ostomy patients for the presence of peristomal complications when they returned for their 2-month postoperative follow-up at a major university hospital. DESIGN: A prospective descriptive design was used. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: For 1 year, new ostomy patients were seen at a 540-bed university-based hospital. Subjects included 220 patients with ostomies who underwent a fecal or urinary diversion at a university-based hospital. INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS: For 12 months, each patient who returned for a 2-month follow-up visit was assessed by 1 of 3 WOC nurses for the presence or absence of peristomal complications using a tool developed by the investigators. The study was conducted from August 2001 to August 2002. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: A total of 220 new ostomy patients were examined, 35 of whom had peristomal complications for a frequency of 16%. Sixteen of the 35 patients had ileostomies, 10 patients had colostomies, and 9 patients had ileal conduits. Of the 35 patients with peristomal complications, 24 had irritant dermatitis, 7 had mechanical injury, and 3 had Candida infections. The WOC nurses determined the causes of the peristomal complications to be related to flush stomas, peristomal hernias, inappropriate opening in the skin barrier, and mechanical injury from the pouching systems. Nine of 35 patients had flush stomas; 5 patients developed peristomal hernias. For 7 patients, the skin barrier in the pouching system was larger than the stoma, allowing the effluent to contact the peristomal skin, resulting in denuded peristomal skin; and 7 patients had pressure areas on the peristomal skin and were wearing convex pouching systems. CONCLUSIONS: With more laparoscopic ostomy surgeries resulting in decreased hospital stays, there is less opportunity for the patient to learn pouching techniques and problem solving regarding peristomal complications. Patients require more education regarding peristomal issues and follow-up after discharge to ensure the maintenance of a secure pouching system. Decreased hospital stays and decreased reimbursement for outpatient and home health services will continue to be a challenge for the WOC nurse. There is also a need for universal definitions of complications and the need for continued studies examining the frequency of these complications, as well as the role of stoma site marking in reducing these complications.