Mechanisms, prevalence and management of cardiac arrhythmias in cancer patients: a comprehensive review.

Recently, prognosis and survival of cancer patients has improved due to progression and refinement of cancer therapies; however, cardiovascular sequelae in this population augmented and now represent the second cause of death in oncological patients. Initially, the main issue was represented by heart failure and coronary artery disease, but a growing body of evidence has now shed light on the increased arrhythmic risk of this population, atrial fibrillation being the most frequently encountered. Awareness of arrhythmic complications of cancer and its treatments may help oncologists and cardiologists to develop targeted approaches for the management of arrhythmias in this population. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the mechanisms triggering cardiac arrhythmias in cancer patients, their prevalence and management.

Long-Term Arrhythmic Risk Assessment in Biopsy-Proven Myocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess long-term arrhythmic risk in patients with myocarditis who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: The arrhythmic risk of patients with myocarditis overtime remains poorly known. METHODS: The study enrolled 56 patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis who received an ICD for either primary (57%) or secondary prevention (43%) according to current guidelines. Clinical characteristics, biopsy findings, electrophysiological data from endocardial 3-dimensional electroanatomic voltage mapping, and device interrogation data were analyzed to detect arrhythmic events overtime. Coronary angiography excluded significant coronary artery disease in all patients. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 74 ± 60 months (median 65 months), 25 (45%) patients had major ventricular arrhythmias treated by ICD intervention (76% being terminated by ICD shock and 24% by antitachyarrhythmia burst pacing). At multivariable analysis, the presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia on admission (hazard ratio: 13.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 35.0; p = 0.032) and the extension of the areas of low potentials at the bipolar endocardial mapping (hazard ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.37; p = 0.013) were the only independent predictors of appropriate ICD interventions. A cutoff value of 10% of abnormal bipolar area at electroanatomical ventricular mapping discriminated patients with appropriate ICD interventions with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that the prevalence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with myocarditis receiving an ICD according to current guidelines is high and the arrhythmic risk persists late overtime. Electroanatomical ventricular mapping may be a useful tool to identify patients at greater arrhythmic risk.