Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Travel Med ; 30(7)2023 11 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: International travellers frequently acquire infectious diseases whilst travelling, yet relatively little is known about the impact and economic burden of these illnesses on travellers. We conducted a prospective exploratory costing study on adult returning travellers with falciparum malaria, dengue, chikungunya or Zika virus. METHODS: Patients were recruited in eight Travel and Tropical Medicine clinics between June 2016 and March 2020 upon travellers' first contact with the health system in their country of residence. The patients were presented with a structured 52-question self-administered questionnaire after full recovery to collect information on patients' healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket costs both in the destination and home country, and about income and other financial losses due to the illness. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients participated in the study (malaria, 66; dengue, 51; chikungunya, 8; Zika virus, 9; all fully recovered; median age 40; range 18-72 years). Prior to travelling, 42% of patients reported procuring medical evacuation insurance. Across the four illnesses, only 7% of patients were hospitalized abroad compared with 61% at home. Similarly, 15% sought ambulatory services whilst abroad compared with 61% at home. The average direct out-of-pocket hospitalization cost in the destination country (USD $2236; range: $108-$5160) was higher than the direct out-of-pocket ambulatory cost in the destination country (USD $327; range: $0-$1560), the direct out-of-pocket hospitalization cost at home (USD $35; range: $0-$120) and the direct out-of-pocket ambulatory costs at home (US$45; range: $0-$192). Respondents with dengue or malaria lost a median of USD $570 (Interquartile range [IQR] 240-1140) and USD $240 (IQR 0-600), respectively, due to their illness, whilst those with chikungunya and Zika virus lost a median of USD $2400 (IQR 1200-3600) and USD $1500 (IQR 510-2625), respectively. CONCLUSION: Travellers often incur significant costs due to travel-acquired diseases. Further research into the economic impact of these diseases on travellers should be conducted.


Assuntos
Febre de Chikungunya , Dengue , Malária Falciparum , Doenças Transmitidas por Vetores , Infecção por Zika virus , Zika virus , Adulto , Animais , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Febre de Chikungunya/epidemiologia , Viagem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Dengue/epidemiologia
2.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 33(5): 411-418, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833689

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With its impact on quality of life and increasing awareness, postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) is now gaining attention as one of the major health problems commonly encountered in gastrointestinal practice. Literature investigating the various pathogenic mechanisms involved is rapidly emerging. The objective of the current review is to provide an update on recent evidence published in the past 2 years describing advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of PI-IBS. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant proportion of research in the recent past was preclinical in nature. Epidemiological studies continue to highlight the risk of IBS after infection, with recent studies documenting postprotozoal effects. Advances in pathogenic mechanisms included clinical studies, which documented micro-RNA down-regulation and Peroxiredoxin-1 up-regulation in colonic mucosa of PI-IBS patients. Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activation in PI-IBS mice models resulted in increase in epithelial permeability, mucosal inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity. Moxibustion and rifamycin reduced intestinal inflammation by inhibiting cytokine and chemokine release via different mechanisms. Miltefosine reduced mast cell degranulation and TRPV1 activation, thereby reducing visceral hypersensitivity. SUMMARY: At present, generalization of limited diagnostic and therapeutic strategies across a heterogeneous prevalent patient population impedes the ability to provide effective personalized care in PI-IBS. Further development in pathogenesis discovery, diagnostic tool development are needed in order to design well tolerated and effective therapies that guide treatments based on distinct pathways of disease.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/terapia , Adulto , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Colo/metabolismo , Gastroenterite/complicações , Humanos , Infecções/complicações , Inflamação/epidemiologia , Inflamação/terapia , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/etiologia , Mastócitos/metabolismo , Camundongos , Moxibustão/métodos , Peroxirredoxinas/metabolismo , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Fosforilcolina/uso terapêutico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor PAR-2/metabolismo , Rifamicinas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA