Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Glob Health ; 11(5): e781-e790, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37061315

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a retrovirus that causes severe diseases, such as aggressive cancer or progressive neurological disease. HTLV-1 affects mainly people in areas with low human development index and can be transmitted from mother to child, primarily through breastfeeding. Refraining from breastfeeding is an effective intervention to reduce the risk of infection in infants. However, HTLV-1 antenatal screening is not offered globally. According to WHO, the scarcity of cost-effectiveness studies is considered one of the major barriers to the implementation of policies to prevent HTLV-1 infection. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening and postnatal interventions to prevent HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission in Brazil and to develop an open-access, editable, mathematical model that can be used by other countries and regions to assess different scenarios. METHODS: In this cost-utility analysis, we constructed a decision tree and a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of HTLV-1 antenatal screening and postnatal interventions (ie, avoidance of breastfeeding, by suppression of lactation with cabergoline, and provision of formula feed) to reduce transmission. For our model, we used data from Brazil and we took the perspective of the public health-care system to estimate costs. FINDINGS: The implementation of both screening and interventions would result in the prevention of 1039 infections in infants every year in Brazil with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$11 415 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). 88% of all probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations had ICER values lower than the Brazilian cost-effectiveness threshold ($18 107·74 per QALY). HTLV-1 prevalence in pregnant women, the risk of HTLV-1 transmission when breastfeeding lasts for 6 months or more, and the cost of screening tests were the variables with the largest effect on ICER. INTERPRETATION: HTLV-1 antenatal screening is cost-effective in Brazil. An open-access model was developed, and this tool could be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of such policy globally, favouring the implementation of interventions to prevent HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission worldwide. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATIONS: For the Portuguese and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 1 Humano , Lactente , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Brasil/epidemiologia , Acesso à Informação , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Análise Custo-Benefício , Linfócitos T
2.
Lancet Glob Health ; 11(5): e781-e790, 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | ColecionaSUS, SES-SP, SESSP-ACVSES, SESSP-IALPROD, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1428440

RESUMO

Background Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a retrovirus that causes severe diseases, such as aggressive cancer or progressive neurological disease. HTLV-1 affects mainly people in areas with low human development index and can be transmitted from mother to child, primarily through breastfeeding. Refraining from breastfeeding is an effective intervention to reduce the risk of infection in infants. However, HTLV-1 antenatal screening is not offered globally. According to WHO, the scarcity of cost-effectiveness studies is considered one of the major barriers to the implementation of policies to prevent HTLV-1 infection. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening and postnatal interventions to prevent HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission in Brazil and to develop an open-access, editable, mathematical model that can be used by other countries and regions to assess different scenarios. Methods In this cost-utility analysis, we constructed a decision tree and a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of HTLV-1 antenatal screening and postnatal interventions (ie, avoidance of breastfeeding, by suppression of lactation with cabergoline, and provision of formula feed) to reduce transmission. For our model, we used data from Brazil and we took the perspective of the public health-care system to estimate costs. Findings The implementation of both screening and interventions would result in the prevention of 1039 infections in infants every year in Brazil with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$11415 per quality-adjusted lifeyear (QALY). 88% of all probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations had ICER values lower than the Brazilian costeffectiveness threshold ($18 107·74 per QALY). HTLV-1 prevalence in pregnant women, the risk of HTLV-1 transmission when breastfeeding lasts for 6 months or more, and the cost of screening tests were the variables with the largest effect on ICER. Interpretation HTLV-1 antenatal screening is cost-effective in Brazil. An open-access model was developed, and this tool could be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of such policy globally, favouring the implementation of interventions to prevent HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission worldwide. (AU)


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Brasil , Linfócitos T , Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 1 Humano , Análise Custo-Benefício
3.
Epilepsy Behav ; 66: 100-104, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28038385

RESUMO

There are difficulties inherent in measuring Quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic illness, including agreement on definitions of quality of life and the type of measure used, disease specific or generic. Well validated QoL instruments for epilepsy exist but focus on capturing common themes pertinent to children and families as a group instead of focusing on themes important to individual patients and their families/carers. In addition, it is common for numerous items on these inventories to be left incomplete or responded to with "not applicable" since many of the items are not suitable for children with disabilities and their families. This led us to devise a way to capture individual quality-of-life measures that are linked to parental/carer expectations in families of children undergoing ketogenic diet therapy for epilepsy. As part of our routine clinical assessment, parents/carers were asked to describe what they would like to see happen or change as a result of their child being on ketogenic diet therapy. A simple unstructured form was designed to facilitate the assessment process. Parents were then asked to rate their own QoL against these criteria on a Likert scale of 0-10 prior to commencement of the diet. This assessment was repeated at subsequent visits with parents/carers initially blinded to their original responses. Our assessments indicated that ketogenic diet therapy improves quality of life over a twelve-month period when measured against parental expectations. This ideographic approach has demonstrated changes in parental Qol and parental perceptions of their child's quality of life that would not have been captured by other validated measures. A lengthy questionnaire is avoided and is replaced by a skilled supportive conversation that identifies goals for treatment that are important to parents. This helps parents to reflect on the progress their child makes on the diet by revisiting their previously stated aspirations, and assessing whether they have been achieved. This is particularly helpful for those parents who express a sense of failure or helplessness relating to their child's intractable epilepsy. As a result, future work will center on developing this approach as a clinical tool.


Assuntos
Dieta Cetogênica/psicologia , Dieta Cetogênica/tendências , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/dietoterapia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cuidadores/psicologia , Criança , Doença Crônica , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 27(4): 316-21, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15050659

RESUMO

In a prospective audit, the prevalence, key causes and treatment of insomnia prior to admission were evaluated in a population of hospice patients using a questionnaire based on a review article of key features related to insomnia in the palliative care setting. Seventy-four patients completed the questionnaire. Fifty-two (70%) patients had insomnia symptoms. Uncontrolled physical symptoms, most often pain (15 patients), were the commonest cause of insomnia, cited by 31 (60%) sleep-disturbed patients. Thirteen (62%) of 21 patients who had been prescribed hypnotic medication reported an improvement with the prescribed medication. Twenty (38%) of the 52 patients with insomnia suggested that improved symptom control would improve their sleep, and only two (4%) suggested the need for more hypnotic medication. We conclude that insomnia is a common symptom in terminally ill patients and that improved symptom control should be a priority in the management of insomnia in this group of patients.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/etiologia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA