Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care: narrative review of C reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) and antibacterial use in patients who present with symptoms of RTI.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to be a global problem and continues to be addressed through national strategies to improve diagnostics, develop new antimicrobials and promote antimicrobial stewardship. Patients who attend general (ambulatory) practice with symptoms of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are invariably assessed by some sort of clinical decision rule (CDR). However, CDRs rely on a cluster of non-specific clinical observations. A narrative review of the literature was undertaken to ascertain the value of C reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) to guide antibacterial prescribing in adult patients presenting to general practitioner (GP) practices with symptoms of RTI. Studies that were included were Cochrane reviews, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised trials, controlled before and after studies, cohort studies and economic evaluations. An overwhelming number of studies demonstrated that the use of CRP tests in patients presenting with RTI symptoms reduces index antibacterial prescribing. GPs and patients report a good acceptability for a CRP POCT and economic evaluations show cost-effectiveness of CRP POCT over existing RTI management in primary care. POCTs increase diagnostic precision for GPs in the better management of patients with RTI. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, patients will expect greater precision in diagnosing and managing their illnesses. Adopting systems that markedly reduce antibiotic consumption is a no-brainer for governments that are struggling to address the rise in AMR.

Rasch analysis of the Antimicrobial Self-Assessment Toolkit for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts (ASAT v17).

OBJECTIVES: The Antimicrobial Self-Assessment Toolkit for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts (ASAT) was developed to evaluate hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes. Iterative validity investigations of the ASAT were used to produce a 91-item ASAT v17 utilizing qualitative methodology. Rasch analysis was used to generate question (item) behaviour estimates and to investigate the validity of ASAT v17. METHODS: In 2012, the partial credit model (PCM) was used to analyse ASAT responses from 33 NHS Trusts within England. WINSTEPS® outputs such as fit statistics and respondent/item maps were examined to determine unidimensionality, item discrimination and item hierarchy. Ordinary least squares regression modelling was used to determine the predictive validity using NHS Trust ability estimates generated from the PCM and corresponding Clostridium difficile rates. RESULTS: Each domain contained items that were misfitting the PCM (with INFIT MNSQ <0.7 or >1.3), except Domain 3. Subsequent iterative item removal had a negligible effect on the fit indices within most ASAT domains. Scale analysis demonstrated that most items were productive for measurement (n = 81). Respondent/item maps showed ceiling effects (n = 3) and floor effects (n = 1) within ASAT domains. Ordinary least squares regression modelling identified that there was limited predictive validity due to the small positive correlation between the predictor and outcome variables for participating hospitals (ρ = 0.146; P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: Rasch analysis was an effective measurement technique for evaluating the validity of ASAT v17 by providing evidence that each sub-scale and the overall scale demonstrated unidimensionality (construct validity). Improved item targeting may be required to improve item discrimination within the toolkit.

Narrative review of primary care point-of-care testing (POCT) and antibacterial use in respiratory tract infection (RTI).

Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem and is being addressed through national strategies to improve diagnostics, develop new antimicrobials and promote antimicrobial stewardship. A narrative review of the literature was undertaken to ascertain the value of C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin, measurements to guide antibacterial prescribing in adult patients presenting to GP practices with symptoms of respiratory tract infection (RTI). Studies that were included were randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies, cohort studies and economic evaluations. Many studies demonstrated that the use of CRP tests in patients presenting with RTI symptoms reduces antibiotic prescribing by 23.3% to 36.16%. Procalcitonin is not currently available as a point-of-care testing (POCT), but has shown value for patients with RTI admitted to hospital. GPs and patients report a good acceptability for a CRP POCT and economic evaluations show cost-effectiveness of CRP POCT over existing RTI management in primary care. POCTs increase diagnostic precision for GPs in the better management of patients with RTI. CRP POCT can better target antibacterial prescribing by GPs and contribute to national antimicrobial resistance strategies. Health services need to develop ways to ensure funding is transferred in order for POCT to be implemented.

When antibiotics can be avoided in skin inflammation and bacterial colonization: a review of topical treatments.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review looks at the recent evidence on the safety, toxicity, microbiology and the prevention and management of acute and chronic wound infections with regard to antiseptics and antiseptic wound dressings. It is timely and relevant because of the global concerns of antimicrobial resistance and the need to address the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in the healthcare setting. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been a number of recent Cochrane reviews that have concluded that there is little evidence to delineate clinical outcomes between antiseptics and antiseptic dressings. Published in-vitro evidence offers some new techniques and evaluates some new dressings and antiseptics. There are no economic evaluations of antiseptics and antiseptic dressings. SUMMARY: Better clinical trials on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of wound dressings are needed to ensure evidence-based guidance is developed for optimizing the treatment of patients. It is surprising that with the paucity of evidence of clinical effectiveness, healthcare organizations continue to spend considerable resources on poorly evaluated topical wound products.

Improving the quality of antibiotic prescribing in the NHS by developing a new Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme: Start Smart--Then Focus.

There has been dramatic change in antibiotic use in English hospitals. Data from 2004 and 2009 show that the focus on reducing fluoroquinolone and second- and third-generation cephalosporin use seems to have been heeded in NHS secondary care, and has been associated with a substantial decline in hospital Clostridium difficile rates. However, there has been a substantial increase in use of co-amoxiclav, carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam. In primary care, antibiotic prescribing fell markedly from 1995 to 2000, but has since risen steadily to levels seen in the early 1990s. There remains a 2-fold variation in antimicrobial prescribing among English General Practices. In 2010, the NHS Atlas of Variation documented a 3-fold variation in the prescription of quinolones and an 18-fold variation in cephalosporins by Primary Care Trusts across England. There is a clear need to improve antimicrobial prescribing. This paper describes the development of new antimicrobial stewardship programmes for primary care and hospitals by the Department of Health's Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection: Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care Initiative. The secondary care programme promotes the rapid prescription of the right antibiotic at the right dose at the right time, followed by active review for all patients still on antibiotics 48 h after admission. The five options available are to stop, switch to oral, continue and review again, change (if possible to a narrower spectrum) or move to outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. A range of audit and outcome tools has been developed, but to maintain optimal antimicrobial usage, monitoring of local and national quantitative and qualitative data on prescribing and consumption is required, linked to the development of key performance indicators in primary, secondary and tertiary care.

Antimicrobial stewardship: an evidence-based, antimicrobial self-assessment toolkit (ASAT) for acute hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology in developing an antimicrobial self-assessment toolkit (ASAT). METHODS: The ASAT was developed through a National Pharmacy Reference Group using an evidence-based approach of published information and national reports to identify criteria for inclusion. These were subdivided into domains that addressed: 1) Antimicrobial management within the Trust-structures and lines of responsibility and accountability-high-level notification to the Board. 2) Operational delivery of an antimicrobial strategy-operational standards of good antimicrobial stewardship. 3) Risk assessment for antimicrobial chemotherapy. 4) Clinical governance assurance. 5) Education and training-training needs and delivery of education and training for all who issue, prescribe and administer antimicrobials. 6) Antimicrobial pharmacist-systems in place for ensuring their optimum use. 7) Patients, Carers and the Public-information needs of patients, carers and the public. RESULTS: A web-based toolkit was developed using information from national reports and guidance on antimicrobial stewardship. The toolkit offers a checklist for hospitals to self-assess their organizations' levels of antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The ASAT offers a web-enabled, version-controlled instrument for the assessment of antimicrobial stewardship in acute hospitals. It may offer a sensitive instrument to assess longitudinal progress on antimicrobial stewardship in an individual institution or act as a benchmark with similar organizations. Further work is ongoing to evaluate and further refine the ASAT.

Antibiotic stewardship--more education and regulation not more availability?

Antibiotics are overused across the world by prescription, self-medication or over the counter (OTC) availability. In the UK, the agenda to increase patient choice has stimulated a move towards greater availability of OTC antibiotics. This trend needs to be urgently reviewed and controlled. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is currently reviewing applications for reclassification of trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin from prescription-only medicines to pharmacy availability or OTC. It is important that anti-infectives do not become more freely available. With the quantity of antibiotic use linked to antibiotic resistance, Society should seek to preserve the use of this irreplaceable resource by education and regulation.

Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the types of prescribing, administration and dispensing incidents reported to an on-line incident-reporting scheme and determine the types of healthcare professionals responsible for reporting such incidents. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of medication-related incidents reported to an on-line incident-reporting scheme in a large (1000-bed) teaching hospital in the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and type of incidents, the discipline of the health care professional who reported the incident and the stage in the medication use process (prescribing, dispensing, or administration) at which the incident occurred. RESULTS: Over a 26-month study period, there were 495 medication-related incidents reported, of which 38.6% (191) were classified to be a "near miss". Medication-related incidents were reported most often at the stages of administration (230, 46.5%) and prescribing (192, 38.8%), whilst incidents involving dispensing or supply of medication were reported less often (73, 14.7%). Of all the incidents, pharmacists reported 51.9% (257), nursing staff reported 37.6% (186), and doctors reported 9.1% (45). Cardiovascular (149, 30.1%), central nervous system (106, 21.4%), and antibiotic/anti-infective medication (71, 14.3%) were the most common therapeutic categories associated with reports of medication-related incidents. CONCLUSION: An on-line reporting scheme can be used to monitor medication-related incidents at key stages in the medication-use process in secondary care. The types of incidents reported by health care professionals differ markedly, with fewer medication-related incidents being reported by doctors. Future research should explore the prevailing safety culture amongst the different health care disciplines, and examine the impact that information technology has on the willingness of health care professionals to report adverse incidents.

Prescribing incentive schemes : a useful approach?

INTRODUCTION: From 2000 to 2004, primary care organisations (PCOs) in England were legally required to operate a prescribing incentive scheme for their general practices. A statutory framework specified the types of target, maximum rewards and use of 'good cause for failure' provisions that schemes should include. Our objective was to explore whether schemes might be a useful approach to encourage 'good quality' prescribing. METHODS: We requested copies of the original schemes from all PCOs in England in 2001 and 2002. Data were extracted on the rewards offered, types of budgetary targets set and additional conditions specified. RESULTS: Many schemes had not been finalised, some PCOs had no scheme, and one scheme operated without rewards. Although schemes covered similar therapeutic areas, they varied considerably in their length, complexity, reward levels and reward structure. Over half the schemes contained no 'good cause for failure' provision. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: PCOs are offering diverse incentives to general practices and some have interpreted the statutory framework imaginatively. Better use of the 'good cause for failure' provision may help to overcome inflationary pressures on prescribing, but further research is needed to clarify the role of financial incentives in influencing prescribing.

Medication management in English National Health Service hospitals.

PURPOSE: The methods currently used by English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to manage the use of medicines were studied. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to directors of pharmacy at all English NHS hospitals in May 2001. RESULTS: The response rate was 57% (157/ 275). Sixty-six percent of the responding hospitals provided general acute care services, and 34% provided mental health services. About 1 responder in 5 (19%) was a specialty hospital functioning either as a freestanding institution or alongside other hospitals. The average total expenditure by the hospital trusts was pound 94 million (dollar 175 million), of which drugs accounted for pound 3.5 million (dollar 6.5 million). Many hospitals either had formularies or were constructing them (86%), and most hospitals used a process to manage the introduction of new medicines. About three fourths of the hospitals had < or = 20 pharmacist full-time equivalents. The implementation of national guidelines was variable, although some of this variation may have been due to differences in service provision. Few hospitals were actively monitoring compliance with guidelines (31%), but audits of current care were common (72%). CONCLUSION: A survey of English NHS hospitals provided information on pharmacy staffing, drug expenditures, and measures taken to ensure rational medication use.

An economic evaluation of the costs and benefits of heparin rationalisation in a hospital pharmacy.

AIM: To estimate the costs and benefits for a UK hospital pharmacy of stocking a single low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, compared to stocking unfractionated heparin (UFH) and stocking both UFH and multiple different LMWHs. METHODS: A decision-tree model was developed which considered the use of heparins for five indications: prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in major orthopaedic surgery; VTE prophylaxis in major general surgery; VTE prophylaxis in acute medical inpatients; treatment of diagnosed VTE; and anticoagulation for patients with unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). Previously published cost-effectiveness analyses for each indication were combined into a single model and updated to 2002 prices. The number of patients given heparin in each indication was estimated from the pharmacy records of a large UK teaching hospital. The model estimated the use of drugs, staff time, clinical events and resource use resulting from anti-coagulation. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the hospital and the UK National Health Service. RESULTS: Total annual cost was estimated to be pounds sterling 3.2 m (single LMWH), pounds sterling 4.4 m (UFH only) and pounds sterling 3.7 m (multiple heparins). The largest expected cost savings from using a single LMWH compared to UFH only resulted from reduced hospital stay for DVT treatment, reduced revascularisation in UA/NSTEMI and fewer VTE events in orthopaedic surgery. Expected cost savings from using a single LMWH compared to multiple heparins were more modest CONCLUSION: Sub-optimal choice of anticoagulants may result in substantial excess costs elsewhere in the hospital.

Influencing prescribing in English primary care: the views of primary care organisations.

OBJECTIVE: The rapid rise of prescribing expenditure is a concern in many industrialised countries and methods to manage medicines are widely employed. The purpose of this study was to identify the approaches to improve primary care prescribing by primary care organisations (PCOs) in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. METHODS: A questionnaire (Management of Medicines, MANMED) was mailed to prescribing advisers and prescribing leads in 332 PCOs. RESULTS: A response rate of 66% (220/332) was achieved. Most PCOs report the improvement of the quality of prescribing as their top priority, followed by budget adherence at both practice and PCO levels. Prescribing advisers typically offer several forms of support: practice visits, prescribing reviews, indicators of prescribing, prescribing newsletters, hands-on support, seminars and local formularies. PCOs are pursuing a wide range of prescribing initiatives, covering, on average, seven different therapeutic areas. National targets are the main driver for prescribing initiatives but other key influences include inappropriate prescribing and clinical governance. Although cost considerations are important, improving the quality of prescribing is perceived as the overriding principle on which PCO prescribing strategy is based. Multifaceted prescribing support is widespread and national targets are the largest single factor influencing choice of therapeutic area for prescribing initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity in approaches presents the opportunity to improve the evidence base for medicines management. Not only could such research inform PCOs in their central aim of improving the quality of prescribing within the NHS, but it may also offer insights of relevance to other countries if the influence of process and context upon the effectiveness of medicines management is systematically explored.