Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Oncol ; 24(4): e323-e327, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28874902

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Regional lymph node dissection (rlnd) for melanoma with nodal metastasis is a specialized procedure that is associated with improved disease-specific survival in selected patients. Furthermore, there is evidence that a higher lymph node retrieval rate (lnrr) is associated with improved local control. Currently, no consensus has been reached on the definition of an adequate lnrr. A minimum lnrr has been proposed as a quality assessment parameter that has to be validated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network, Toronto, ON). The lnrrs for all patients who underwent rlnd for malignant cutaneous melanoma during 2000-2010 were recorded. Indications for rlnd were a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or clinical lymphadenopathy (palpable or radiologically detected). RESULTS: Of the 207 identified rlnds, 146 (70.5%) were subsequent to a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 61 (29.5%) were performed for clinical lymphadenopathy. The median lnrr was 24 nodes (range: 9-47 nodes; 10th percentile: 14 nodes) for axillary rlnd, 12 nodes (range: 5-30 nodes; 10th percentile: 8 nodes) for inguinal rlnd, and 16 nodes (range: 10-21 nodes; 10th percentile: 11 nodes) for ilioinguinal rlnd. The results were similar when comparing patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes and those with clinical lymphadenopathy, and the same surgical techniques were used in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lnrrs at our institution are similar to rates reported at other tertiary-care melanoma centres. A minimum acceptable lnrr can be considered a quality assessment parameter in the surgical management of melanoma with nodal metastasis.

2.
Minerva Med ; 104(1): 1-21, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23392534

RESUMO

Since its introduction in late 1970's, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has undergone an evolution in both equipment and technique. This evolution still continues today in the era of minimally invasive treatment options, and is evidenced by the numerous publications. PNL is generally advantageous in the management of large renal stones (>1.5-2 cm) with high stone-free rates and considerable complication rates. However this technique is especially competing with retrograde intrarenal surgery and laparoscopic techniques. Therefore the CROES Global PNL Study Group prospectively collected data of over 5800 patients managed with PNL worldwide and analyzed the data in detail, producing more than 25 scientific papers. And this update focuses on the lessons learned from the CROES PCNL Global Study.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Fatores Etários , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Dilatação/instrumentação , Dilatação/métodos , Endoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Rim/anormalidades , Cálculos Renais/química , Cálculos Renais/patologia , Túbulos Renais Coletores , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/tendências , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Decúbito Dorsal , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA