[Trends in social inequities in diabetes care in the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur region of France between 2008 and 2011]. / Évolution des inégalités sociales de suivi du diabète en région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur entre 2008 et 2011.

BACKGROUND: Social inequities in healthcare are known to exist for the management of many chronic diseases in France, including diabetes. The recession that began in 2008 has led to increased income disparities but has it also exacerbated health inequities. The aim of this study was to describe trends in inequities in diabetes-related healthcare between 2008 and 2011 in the PACA region (Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur). METHODS: This analysis used two sources of data: the regional national health insurance fund (PACA region) reimbursement database and the socio-demographic databases of the national statistics office (INSEE) for four full years (2008 to 2011). It included individuals who had been reimbursed for three purchases of oral diabetes drugs during the previous year and assessed the association between the median household income (weighted by number and age of household members) of each patient's municipality of residence and seven indicators of diabetes monitoring and care. Using adjusted mixed logistic models, including an interaction term between time (number of years) and the median household income of the municipality, we examined the performance of the indicators for each year. RESULTS: The total number of patients with diabetes in the 941 municipalities of the PACA region varied by year from 142,055 to 164,929. Models showed that living in a town with a high or intermediate household income was significantly associated with better performance of the seven indicators and that the interaction term was significant for six of them. The effect of the municipal median income decreased significantly between 2008 and 2011 for five indicators: HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, microalbuminuria, ophthalmoscopy and diabetes specialist visit. CONCLUSION: Social inequities in diabetes-related healthcare persisted between 2008 and 2011 but appeared to be decreasing, despite the recession.

Geographical disparities in prescription practices of lithium and clozapine: a community-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the socioeconomic and health resource characteristics associated with geographical variations of lithium and clozapine dispensing rates in France. METHOD: The study was performed using reimbursement data from the French Insurance Healthcare system over the period 2006-2013 in a community-based sample of persons aged 16 years and over. An ecological design was used to assess whether lithium and clozapine prescribing rates were associated with socioeconomic and health resource characteristics of the zone of residence (n = 95 French administrative subdivisions). RESULTS: Large geographical disparities were observed in dispensing rates: lithium dispensing rates by zone of residence ranged from 0 to 6.6 per 1000 (mean 2.4 per 1000) and clozapine dispensing rates ranged from 0 to 4.9 per 1000 (mean 0.8 per 1000). Higher density of GPs and regular communication between mental health services and primary care were independently associated with higher rates of lithium and clozapine dispensing and with a higher proportion of lithium users among mood-stabilizer users. CONCLUSION: A sufficient density of GPs and an effective communication and collaboration between mental healthcare services and primary care seems to favor greater access to psychotropic drugs with demonstrated efficacy but often viewed as 'risky' to prescribe.

[Relevance of the health insurance databases to study spatial disparities in asthma prevalence: A study in southeastern France]. / Intérêt des données de remboursement de l'assurance-maladie pour l'étude des disparités territoriales de la prévalence de l'asthme : une étude en Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.

BACKGROUND: Data on asthma prevalence at a small-area level would be useful to set up and monitor French local public health policies. This study, based on drug reimbursement databases in southeastern France, aimed to (1) compare asthma-like disorders prevalence estimated by using three different indicators; (2) study sociodemographic characteristics associated with these indicators; (3) verify whether these indicators are equivalent to study geographical disparities of the asthma-like disorders prevalence at a small-area level. METHODS: The study was conducted among the beneficiaries of the National Health Insurance Fund aged 18-44 years residing in southeastern France in 2010 (n=1,371,816). Using data on asthma drugs reimbursements (therapeutic class R03), we built three indicators to assess asthma-like disorders prevalence: at least 1, 2 or 3 purchase(s) in 2010. We analyzed sociodemographic characteristics associated with these indicators, and their geographical disparities at a small-area level using multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: The crude asthma-like disorders prevalence varied between 2.6 % and 8.4 % depending on the indicator. It increased with age, was higher for women than for men, and among low-income people for all three indicators. We measured significant geographical disparities. Areas with high prevalence rates were the same regardless of the indicator. CONCLUSION: The indicators built in this study can be useful to identify high prevalence areas. They could contribute to launch discussion on environmental health issues at the local level.

[Potentially inappropriate prescriptions for the elderly: a study of health insurance reimbursements in Southeastern France]. / Prescriptions médicamenteuses potentiellement inadaptées chez les personnes âgées : une étude en Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur à partir des données de remboursements de l'Assurance maladie.

BACKGROUND: This study conducted in the region of Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (PACA) sought to assess the feasibility of constructing and using indicators of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for the elderly from health insurance reimbursement data. We present and discuss different indicators of inappropriate prescriptions for people aged 70 years or older (at-risk prescriptions, dangerous or at-risk coprescriptions, absence of necessary coprescriptions) and reports their prevalence in PACA. METHODS: The indicators were constructed from the French list of inappropriate prescriptions, national agency guidelines, and the advice of experts in the field. The indicators selected were applied to the databases of the PACA Salaried Workers' Health Insurance Fund for 2008 for all recipients aged 70 years or older and compared according to age, sex, chronic disease status, and, after standardization for age and sex, according to district of residence. RESULTS: In January 2009, 500,904 recipients aged 70 years or older were identified in the data base of the Salaried Workers' Health Insurance Fund, 60.8% of whom were women and 52.1% of whom had approved coverage for a chronic disease. The potentially inappropriate prescriptions most frequently observed here, in decreasing order, were: prescription of an NSAID without the coprescription of gastric protection (28.1%); long-term benzodiazepine treatment (21.5%); prescription of long half-life benzodiazepine (14.9%), and long-term treatment with NSAIDs (11.6%). Overall, the prevalence of each increased significantly with age and was higher among women and people with chronic diseases. Significant variations were also observed between the different districts of PACA. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that a substantial proportion of elderly people receive potentially inappropriate prescriptions. They also suggest that health insurance reimbursement data could be used in some prescription domains for monitoring trends in the potentially inappropriate prescriptions in the populations of various territories, provided that specific limitations are considered.

Feedback and lessons from the prescription of rimonabant, a drug to be used under strict guidelines, in southeastern France, March 2007 through June 2008.

BACKGROUND: To provide feedback on the initial market authorization of rimonabant, a drug to be used under strict guidelines, we conducted a study with information from the National health insurance reimbursements database for southeastern France. The aims of this study were to: (1) describe the characteristics of subjects who have had one rimonabant prescription reimbursed; (2) study the frequency of prescriptions that did not comply with reimbursement criteria; (3) study the frequency of prescriptions for patients simultaneously treated with antidepressants; and (4) analyse the factors associated with both types of prescription (patient and prescriber characteristics). METHODS: Using the database of drug reimbursements maintained by the southeastern France general health insurance fund, we studied the characteristics of outpatients with at least one reimbursement for rimonabant, compared them to the rest of the population, and analysed compliance with the indications, contraindications, and regulations for rimonabant prescription with multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 10,510 beneficiaries (0.28%) had at least one rimonabant reimbursement. Among them, 55.7% were treated for diabetes. For at least 62.4% of rimonabant beneficiaries, the reimbursement regulations were not respected: this was significantly more frequent among women less than 57 years old, subjects with no chronic diseases, and when the prescriber was not an endocrinologist; 11.4% of rimonabant beneficiaries also received an antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite the specific status of rimonabant regarding its reimbursement modalities, these results suggest that some prescribers get around reimbursement instructions and that a significant percentage of prescriptions did not respect an important contraindication. Tools to follow up the prescriptions of new drugs with strict guidelines for use should be developed and physicians should be better informed and trained regarding specific prescription regulations.