Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of abaloparatide and teriparatide in postmenopausal women new to anabolic therapy: A US administrative claims database study.

Real-world evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of abaloparatide versus teriparatide in women with osteoporosis may help inform treatment decisions. Following 18 months of treatment, abaloparatide was comparable to teriparatide for prevention of nonvertebral fractures, resulted in a 22% risk reduction for hip fractures, and demonstrated similar cardiovascular safety. Osteoporotic fracture risk can be reduced with anabolic or antiresorptive medications. In addition to efficacy and safety data from controlled clinical trials, real-world evidence on comparative effectiveness and safety may help inform treatment decisions. INTRODUCTION: The real-world effectiveness of abaloparatide versus teriparatide on nonvertebral fracture (NVF) incidence and cardiovascular safety during the 19-month period after treatment initiation were evaluated (NCT04974723). METHODS: Anonymized US patient claims data from Symphony Health, Integrated Dataverse (IDV)®, May 1, 2017 to July 31, 2019, included women aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 prescription of abaloparatide or teriparatide and no prior anabolic therapy. Most were enrolled in commercial and Medicare health plans. Index was the date of the initial prescription dispensed during the identification period. In 1:1 propensity score matched cohorts, time to first NVF following index date, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and MACE + heart failure (HF) were compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 11,616 patients per cohort. Overall median age (interquartile range) was 67 (61, 75) years, and 25.6% had a fracture history. Over 19 months, 335 patients on abaloparatide and 375 on teriparatide had a NVF (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.89 [0.77, 1.03]), and 121 and 154 patients, respectively, had a hip fracture [HR (95% CI): 0.78 (0.62, 1.00)]. The MACE and MACE + HF rates were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Following 18 months of treatment, abaloparatide was comparable to teriparatide for prevention of NVF and similar cardiovascular safety was demonstrated between cohorts.

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is cost-effective when it was incorporated in the routine screening for osteoporosis in community-dwelling women aged ≥ 65 years, which support guidelines, such as the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment. INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of VFA as a screening tool to reduce future fracture risk in US community-dwelling women aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS: An individual-level state-transition cost-effectiveness model from a healthcare perspective was constructed using derived data from published literature. The time horizon was lifetime. Five screening strategies were compared, including no screening at all, central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) only, VFA only, central DXA followed by VFA if the femoral neck T-score (FN-T) ≤ - 1.5, or if the FN-T ≤ - 1.0. Various initiation ages and rescreening intervals were evaluated. Oral bisphosphonate treatment for 5-year periods was assumed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2017 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained) were used as the outcome measure. RESULTS: The incorporation of VFA slightly increased life expectancy by 0.1 years and reduced the number of subsequent osteoporotic fractures by 3.7% and 7.7% compared with using DXA alone and no screening, respectively, leading to approximately 30 billion dollars saved. Regardless of initiation ages and rescreening intervals, central DXA followed by VFA if the FN-T ≤ - 1.0 was most cost-effective ($40,792 per QALY when the screening is initiated at age 65 years and with rescreening every 5 years). Results were robust to change in VF incidence and medication costs. CONCLUSION: In women aged ≥ 65 years, VFA is cost-effective when it was incorporated in routine screening for osteoporosis. Our findings support the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment.

Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis.

The surgeon general of the USA defines osteoporosis as "a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture." Measuring bone strength, Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT), namely, finite element analysis of a patient's clinical-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan, is now available in the USA as a Medicare screening benefit for osteoporosis diagnostic testing. Helping to address under-diagnosis of osteoporosis, BCT can be applied "opportunistically" to most existing CT scans that include the spine or hip regions and were previously obtained for an unrelated medical indication. For the BCT test, no modifications are required to standard clinical CT imaging protocols. The analysis provides measurements of bone strength as well as a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at the hip and a volumetric BMD of trabecular bone at the spine. Based on both the bone strength and BMD measurements, a physician can identify osteoporosis and assess fracture risk (high, increased, not increased), without needing confirmation by DXA. To help introduce BCT to clinicians and health care professionals, we describe in this review the currently available clinical implementation of the test (VirtuOst), its application for managing patients, and the underlying supporting evidence; we also discuss its main limitations and how its results can be interpreted clinically. Together, this body of evidence supports BCT as an accurate and convenient diagnostic test for osteoporosis in both sexes, particularly when used opportunistically for patients already with CT. Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) uses a patient's CT scan to measure both bone strength and bone mineral density at the hip or spine. Performing at least as well as DXA for both diagnosing osteoporosis and assessing fracture risk, BCT is particularly well-suited to "opportunistic" use for the patient without a recent DXA who is undergoing or has previously undergone CT testing (including hip or spine regions) for an unrelated medical condition.

Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

A measurement of bone mass is the single most important determinant of future fracture. However, controversy exists as to which technique (dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), and which site of skeletal measurement (axial vs appendicular) provides the best prediction of fracture risk. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the ability of pQCT to predict bone mass of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm measured using DXA, and (2) to compare the ability of DXA and pQCT to discriminate prevalent fractures in women with established osteoporosis. One hundred and sixty-five women were studied, including 47 with established osteoporosis (vertebral, hip or Colles' fractures) as well as 118 who had bone mass measurements to assess osteoporosis risk. Each subject had bone mass measured by DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, and at the distal radius by both DXA and pQCT. In women with fractures, bone mass, when expressed as a standardized score, was in general lower using DXA compared with the appendicular skeleton measured using pQCT. Bone mass determinations at all sites were significantly correlated with each other. The highest correlation coefficients were observed within the axial skeleton. In women with fractures, the highest odds ratios were observed at skeletal regions measured using DXA. Likewise, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were comparable at all skeletal regions measured using DXA; and were significantly greater than the areas under the ROC curves for pQCT measurements. In summary, the strongest discriminators of prevalent fractures were measurements using DXA. Measurements of bone mass at the appendicular skeleton, using either DXA or pQCT, were poorly associated with axial bone mass. PQCT has the poorer ability to discriminate persons with fractures, and appears to be less sensitive than measurements using DXA.

Histomorphometric assessment of bone mass, structure, and remodeling: a comparison between healthy black and white premenopausal women.

While noninvasive studies of bone mass and turnover in blacks and whites abound, histologic evaluations are very rare. We have performed a comparative bone histomorphometric study of iliac biopsies from 55 healthy, premenopausal women including 21 blacks (mean age 33.4 + 1.2 years) and 34 whites (mean age 32.5 + 0.8 years) of comparable age, weight, body composition, education, and lifestyle. Biochemical indices of mineral metabolism: parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, serum ionized calcium, serum phosphorus, and urinary calcium/creatinine were measured in the fasting state. Blacks had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (315 +/- 3.36 vs. 63.21 +/- 3.79 nmol/l, p = 0.0001). Histomorphometric indices of bone volume, structure, and connectivity were not different between groups. The following indices of bone remodeling were also similar in both groups: eroded perimeter, osteoid width, mineralizing perimeter, tissue-based bone formation rate, osteoid maturation time, active formation period, and activation frequency. However, osteoid perimeter (black [B] = 15.85 +/- 1.30 vs. white [W] = 9.49 +/- 0.70%, p = 0.0002), osteoid area (B = 2.55 +/- 0.32 vs. W = 1.39 +/- 0.12%, p = 0.003), single-labeled perimeter (B = 5.46 +/- 0.54 vs. W = 4.04 +/- 0.33%, p = 0.03), mineralization lag time (B = 38.18 +/- 4.04 vs. W = 21.83 +/- 1.60 days, p < 0.009), and total formation period (B = 148.15 +/- 19.70 vs. W = 84.04 +/- 7.62 days, p = 0.0056) were higher in blacks than in whites. The quiescent perimeter (B = 76.91 +/- 1.40 vs. W = 84.25 +/- 0.91%, p = 0.0001), mineral apposition rate (B = 0.70 +/- 0.02 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.02 micron/day, p = 0.066), mineralizing osteoid perimeter (B = 0.49 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.04%, p = 0.0001) and adjusted apposition rate (B = 0.35 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.58 +/- 0.04 micron3/micron2/day, p = 0.0001) were all lower in blacks than in whites. These results indicate that there are no differences in bone volume, microstructure, or turnover between black and white premenopausal women. However, there are significant differences in the mechanism of bone formation between the two groups, with a lower rate of mineralized matrix apposition within each remodeling unit and a longer total formation period in blacks than in whites. The differences appear to the result of more frequent and/or longer inactive periods in the life span of the bone formation units in blacks. These differences may allow a greater overall deposition of bone mineral in black women and therefore help explain a higher bone mass and perhaps better bone quality in black than white women.

Estrogen protection against bone resorbing effects of parathyroid hormone infusion. Assessment by use of biochemical markers.

OBJECTIVE: Because parathyroid hormone (PTH) stimulates bone resorption, resistance to its actions might help maintain bone mass. We tested the hypothesis that the effects of estrogen on bone are accomplished in part by decreasing the sensitivity of the skeleton to the resorbing effects of PTH. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of response to PTH infusion in untreated and estrogen-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. INTERVENTION: (1-34) human PTH, 0.55 U/(kg.h), was infused intravenously over 20 hours. SETTING: The inpatient clinical research unit of a referral hospital. PATIENTS: Women with primary postmenopausal osteoporosis who were untreated (n = 15) or treated with estrogen (n = 17). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skeletal turnover indices including hydroxyproline, deoxypyridinoline, pyridinoline, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, bone Gla protein, and insulin-like growth factor-1. RESULTS: All basal indices were higher in untreated than in estrogen-treated women, but statistical differences were seen only for deoxypyridinoline and pyridinoline. During the 20-hour infusion, hydroxyproline/creatinine increased 0.023 mumol/mumol in untreated women but only 0.010 mumol/mumol in estrogen-treated women (P < 0.05). Corresponding changes for deoxypyridinoline/creatinine were 14.6 mumol/mumol and 3.5 mumol/mumol (P = 0.06). Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and pyridinoline increased only in untreated group. A circadian rhythm in circulating bone Gla protein was seen in both groups without clear PTH-induced effects or differences between groups. Alkaline phosphatase levels decreased and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels increased in both groups with no distinction between untreated and estrogen-treated women [corrected]. CONCLUSION: The estrogenized postmenopausal osteoporotic skeleton is less sensitive to the bone resorbing effects of acutely administered PTH. There are no differential effects on bone formation.

Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Forearm bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at proximal and distal sites by 125I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 67 consecutive subjects, aged 18-75 years. Correlations and regression equations between these two techniques were determined. All forearm measurements were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.599-0.926; P < or = 0.0001). Although SPA and DXA correct for fat in different ways, we found similar correlation and regression equations in women with body mass index measurements above and below the mean. In addition, forearm measurements by both techniques were moderately correlated with vertebral spine and hip BMD. We conclude that overall, SPA forearm measurements in a population can be calibrated to DXA measurements if necessary, and that DXA forearm measurements are as predictive of the remainder of the skeleton as SPA measurements.