Up and over: Consequences of raising the United States-Mexico border wall height.

OBJECTIVES: San Diego County's geographic location lends a unique demographic of migrant patients injured by falls at the United States-Mexico border. To prevent migrant crossings, a 2017 Executive Order allocated funds to increase the southern California border wall height from 10 ft to 30 ft, which was completed in December 2019. We hypothesized that the elevated border wall height is associated with increased major trauma, resource utilization, and health care costs. METHODS: Retrospective trauma registry review of border wall falls was performed by the two Level I trauma centers that admit border fall patients from the southern California border from January 2016 to June 2022. Patients were assigned to either "pre-2020" or "post-2020" subgroups based upon timing of completion of the heightened border wall. Total number of admissions, operating room utilization, hospital charges, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS: Injuries from border wall falls grew 967% from 2016 to 2021 (39 vs. 377 admissions); this percentage is expected to be supplanted in 2022. When comparing the two subgroups, operating room utilization (175 vs. 734 total operations) and median hospital charges per patient ($95,229 vs. $168,795) have risen dramatically over the same time period. Hospital costs increased 636% in the post-2020 subgroup ($11,351,216 versus $72,172,123). The majority (97%) of these patients are uninsured at admission, with costs largely subsidized by federal government entities (57%) or through state Medicaid enrollment postadmission (31%). CONCLUSION: The increased height of the United States-Mexico border wall has resulted in record numbers of injured migrant patients, placing novel financial and resource burdens on already stressed trauma systems. To address this public health crisis, legislators and health care providers must conduct collaborative, apolitical discussions regarding the border wall's efficacy as a means of deterrence and its impact on traumatic injury and disability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Who is informed of trauma informed care? Patients' primary language and comprehensiveness of initial trauma assessment.

BACKGROUND: For patients with limited English proficiency, language poses a unique challenge in patient-provider communication. Using certified medical interpretation (CMI) can be difficult in time- and resource-limited settings including trauma. We hypothesized that there would be limited use of CMI during major trauma resuscitations, less comprehensive assessments, and less empathetic communication for Spanish-speaking patients (SSPs) with limited English proficiency compared with English-speaking patients (ESPs). METHODS: We analyzed video-recorded encounters of trauma initial assessments at a Level 1 trauma center. Each encounter was evaluated from patient arrival until completion of the secondary survey per Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol. A standard checklist of provider actions was used to assess comprehensiveness of the primary and secondary surveys and communication events such as provider introduction, reassurances, and communicating next steps to patients. We compared the SSP and ESP cohorts for significant differences in completion of checklist items. RESULTS: Fifty patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 14 and 15 were included (25 SSPs, 25 ESPs). The median age was 34 years (interquartile range, 25-65 years) for SSPs and 40 years (interquartile range, 29-54 years) for ESPs. In SSPs, 72% were male; in ESPs, 60% were male. Spanish-speaking patients received less comprehensive motor (48% complete SSPs vs. 96% ESPs, p < 0.001) and sensory (4% complete SSPs vs. 68% ESPs, p < 0.001) examinations, and less often had providers explain next steps (32% SSPs vs. 96% ESPs, p < 0.001) or reassure them (44% SSPs vs. 88% ESPs, p = 0.001). No patients were asked their primary language. Two SSP encounters (8%) used CMI; most (80%) used ad hoc interpretation, and 12% used English. CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in the initial care provided to trauma patients based on primary language. Inclusion of an interpreter as part of the trauma team may improve the quality of care provided to trauma patients with limited English proficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

A tale of two centers: Is low-molecular-weight heparin really superior for prevention of posttraumatic venous thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is widely used for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis following injury. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a less expensive option. We compared LMWH and UFH for prevention of posttraumatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Trauma patients 15 years or older with at least one administration of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis at two level I trauma centers with similar DVT-screening protocols were identified. Center 1 administered UFH every 8 hours for chemoprophylaxis, and center 2 used twice-daily antifactor Xa-adjusted LMWH. Clinical characteristics and primary chemoprophylaxis agent were evaluated in a two-level logistic regression model. Primary outcome was incidence of DVT and PE. RESULTS: There were 3,654 patients: 1,155 at center 1 and 2,499 at center 2. The unadjusted DVT rate at center 1 was lower than at center 2 (3.5% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.04); PE rates did not significantly differ (0.4% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.64). Patients at center 2 were older (mean, 50.3 vs. 47.3 years; p < 0.001) and had higher Injury Severity Scores (median, 10 vs. 9; p < 0.001), longer stays in the hospital (mean, 9.4 vs. 7.0 days; p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (mean, 3.0 vs. 1.3 days; p < 0.001), and a higher mortality rate (1.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.02) than patients at center 1. Center 1's patients received their first dose of chemoprophylaxis earlier than patients at center 2 (median, 1.0 vs. 1.7 days; p < 0.001). After risk adjustment and accounting for center effects, primary chemoprophylaxis agent was not associated with risk of DVT (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.48; p = 0.949). Cost calculations showed that UFH was less expensive than LMWH. CONCLUSION: Primary utilization of UFH is not inferior to LMWH for posttraumatic DVT chemoprophylaxis and rates of PE are similar. Given that UFH is lower in cost, the choice of this chemoprophylaxis agent may have major economic implications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level II; Therapeutic, level III.

Repeat head computed tomography for anticoagulated patients with an initial negative scan is not cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Patients on antithrombotic medications presenting with blunt trauma are at risk for delayed intracranial hemorrhage. We hypothesized that clinically significant delayed intracranial hemorrhage is rare in patients presenting on antithrombotic medications and therefore routine, repeat head computed tomography imaging is not a cost-effective practice to monitor for delayed intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: Patients presenting to our institution on antithrombotic (anticoagulant and antiplatelet) medications during a 5-y period from January 2014 through March 2019 who underwent a head computed tomography for blunt trauma were identified in our trauma registry. Patients with an initial negative head computed tomography underwent repeat imaging 6 h after their initial head computed tomography. Patient demographics, antithrombotic medication, international normalized ratio, Glasgow Coma Score, clinical change in neurologic status, and need for neurosurgical intervention were collected. RESULTS: Our institution evaluated 1,676 patients on antithrombotic therapy with blunt trauma. The initial head computed tomography was negative in 1,377 patients (82.0%). Of those with an initial negative head computed tomography, 12 patients (0.9%) developed an intracranial hemorrhage that was identified on the second head computed tomography. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage included 6 patients with intraventricular hemorrhage, 3 with subdural hematoma, 2 with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1 with an intraparenchymal hemorrhage. None of the patients with delayed intracranial hemorrhage developed a change in neurologic status, required an intracranial pressure monitor, or underwent neurosurgical intervention. The estimated total direct cost of the negative head computed tomography scans was $926,247. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant delayed intracranial hemorrhage is rare in trauma patients on antithrombotic therapy, with an initial negative head computed tomography. Routine repeat head computed tomography imaging in patients with a negative scan on admission is not cost-effective.

Emergency General Surgery and the Gallbladder: The Affordable Care Act's Impact on Practice Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder disease frequently requires emergency general surgery (EGS). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated health insurance coverage for all with the intent to improve access to care and decrease morbidity, mortality, and costs. We hypothesize that after the ACA open-enrollment in 2014 the number of EGS cholecystectomies decreased as access to care improved with a shift in EGS cholecystectomies to teaching institutions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample Database from 2012 to quarter 3 of 2015 was performed. Patients age 18-64, with a nonelective admission for gallbladder disease based on ICD-9 codes, were collected. Outcomes measured included cholecystectomy, complications, mortality, and wage index-adjusted costs. The effect of the ACA was determined by comparing preACA to postACA years. RESULTS: 189,023 patients were identified. In the postACA period the payer distribution for admissions decreased for Self-pay (19.3% to 13.6%, P < 0.001), Medicaid increased (26.3% to 34.0%, P < 0.001) and Private insurance was unchanged (48.6% to 48.7%, P = 0.946). PostACA, admissions to teaching hospitals increased across all payer types, EGS cholecystectomies decreased, while complications increased, and mortality was unchanged. Median costs increased significantly for Medicaid and Private insurance while Self-pay was unchanged. Based on adjusted DID analyses for Insured compared to Self-pay patients, EGS cholecystectomies decreased (-2.7% versus -1.21%, P = 0.033) and median cost increased more rapidly (+$625 versus +$166, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The ACA has changed EGS, shifting the majority of patients to teaching institutions despite insurance type and decreasing the need for EGS cholecystectomy. The trend toward higher complication rate with increased overall cost requires attention.

Who's being left behind? Uninsured emergency general surgery admissions after the ACA.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased Medicaid coverage of Emergency General Surgery (EGS). We hypothesized that despite the ACA, racial and geographic disparities persisted for EGS admissions. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2012 through Q3 of 2015 for Non-Medicare patient EGS admissions. Difference-in-Differences analyses (DID) compared payors, complications, mortality and costs in pre-ACA years (2012-2013) and post-ACA years (2014-2015Q3). RESULTS: EGS cases fell 9.1% from 1,711,940 to 1,555,033 NIS-weighted cases. Hispanics were still most likely to be uninsured but had improved coverage (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.96, p < 0.001). Risk of uninsured EGS admissions from the South region persisted (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.46-1.58, p < 0.001). Uninsured EGS patients had higher DID increased mortality than insured patients (0.31% higher, P = 0.003). Insured group DID costs increased more rapidly than in self-pay Patients (6.0% higher, P = 0.008) CONCLUSIONS: Post ACA, risk of uninsured EGS admissions remained highest in the South, in males, and Hispanics.

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on elective general surgery clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) dramatically changed the healthcare system in the United States. This study aims to analyze the impact of the ACA on general surgery clinic visits and resultant procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on new patients who presented to the elective general surgery clinic at an academic medical center between Jan. 1, 2012 and Dec. 31, 2015. Based on the open enrollment start date of Jan.1, 2014 patients were divided into pre-ACA and post-ACA periods. Data on demographics, type of insurance, missed appointments, and elective surgical procedures performed were collected. RESULTS: Medi-Cal insurance coverage increased post-ACA from 20.9% to 56.7%, p < 0.001; self-pay status went from 9.8% to 0%. There were 296 (35.4%) surgical procedures performed pre-ACA and 347 (37.1%) post-ACA (p = 0.445). Missed clinic visits decreased after implementation of the ACA, with 26.8% no-shows pre-ACA and 20.7% no-shows post-ACA (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The ACA had a profound impact on the general surgery clinic with fewer uninsured patients, fewer no-shows and a modest increase in the number of procedures performed. SUMMARY: In 2014 the Affordable Care Act mandate was implemented. This legislation impacted healthcare by significantly decreasing the number of uninsured patients and increasing overall volume in one general surgery clinic.

Quantitative assessment of intestinal injury using a novel in vivo, near-infrared imaging technique.

Intestinal injury owing to inflammation, severe trauma, and burn is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Currently, animal models employed to study the intestinal response to injury and inflammation depend on outdated methods of analysis. Given that these classic intestinal assays are lethal to the experimental animal, there is no ability to study the gut response to injury in the same animal over time. We postulated that by developing an in vivo assay to image intestinal injury using fluorescent dye, it could complement other expensive, time-consuming, and semiquantitative classic means of detecting intestinal injury. We describe a novel in vivo, noninvasive method to image intestinal injury using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera that allows for serial visual and quantitative analysis of intestinal injury. Our results correlate with traditional, time-consuming, semiquantitative assays of intestinal injury, now allowing the noninvasive, nonlethal assessment of injury over time.