Impact of duration of antidepressant treatment on the risk of occurrence of a new sequence of antidepressant treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recommendation that antidepressant treatment should be continued for several months to reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence of depression, early discontinuation is frequent in naturalistic conditions. The study was aimed at exploring the impact of early discontinuation of antidepressant treatment on the risk of antidepressant re-initiation. METHODS: A follow-up study of persons (n=35,053) starting antidepressant treatment was performed using a representative sample of the French Social Security Insurance national database. RESULTS: The risk of re-initiation of antidepressant treatment was higher if the duration of the index episode of antidepressant treatment was ≥ 6 months [hazard ratio (HR)=2.35; 95% CI 2.25-2.45) or 2-5 months (HR=1.65; 95% CI 1.59-1.71) compared to ≤ 1 month. The other characteristics independently associated with re-initiation of treatment were older age, female gender, low income, serious chronic illness, index prescription by a specialist and co-prescription of other psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The lower risk of re-initiation of antidepressant treatment in persons with shorter-than-recommended duration of antidepressant treatment might be explained by overprescription of antidepressants in persons with sub-threshold symptoms.

[Occupational outcome of patients with schizophrenia after first request for disability status: a 2-year follow-up study]. / Devenir professionnel de sujets souffrant de schizophrénie dans les deux ans suivant l'obtention du statut adulte handicapé.

OBJECTIVE: To assess occupational outcome of persons with schizophrenia over the 2 years following the first request of disability status. METHODS: This study was carried out in collaboration with the Commission Technique d'Orientation et de Reclassement Professionnel (COTOREP) (technical commission for occupational guidance and rehabilitation of the disabled) de la Gironde (Bordeaux region, South Western France). Persons with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requesting for the first time in 2006 a disability allowance or the status of disabled worker were assessed using a standardized questionnaire collecting data on clinical, occupational and income history. Information on occupational outcome over the 2 years after the first request was collected at the end of the follow-up using multiple sources of information. We used a broad definition of work, including moonlighting and episodic activities (baby-sitting or grape-harvesting), as well as study periods. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients included at baseline, direct or indirect information was available for 108 (90%) at the 24-month assessment. Persons lost to follow-up were less likely to have worked before first request of disability status compared to persons with information available at the end of the follow-up, but did not differ regarding the other characteristics. Nearly half of the persons (41.7%) had worked over the follow-up, irrespective of the type and duration of the occupation. The working periods were of short duration (median duration 14.5 days, interquartile range 6.5-47.5) and most (98%) were done in low-qualified jobs. Nearly half of the persons reported that they had benefitted from support for starting or returning to work, mainly from recruitment agencies specialized in supporting disabled workers. Persons with the status of disabled worker (Reconnaissance de la qualité de travailleur handicapé) (RTH) were more likely to have worked over the follow-up period (66.7% vs 33.3%; OR=3.9; 95%IC 1.3-11.3; p<0.01) as well as persons who had benefitted from institutional support (61.1% vs 38.9%; OR=3.0; 95%IC 1.2-7.8; p=0.02). However, a noteworthy result was that most jobs were obtained by the patient's personal effort. Nearly one out of four patients (23.2%) was involved in vocational training over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates that half of persons with schizophrenia who benefit from the disabled status remain actively engaged in vocational rehabilitation. Hence, giving access to disability status does not act as a disincentive regarding the return or access to work. However, the benefit of being kept involved in vocational rehabilitation has to be weighted against the fact that most patients only obtained low-qualified jobs of short-duration. This precarious situation may be stressful and may have a deleterious impact regarding self-esteem.

Impact of antidepressants on the risk of suicide in patients with depression in real-life conditions: a decision analysis model.

BACKGROUND: The impact of antidepressant drug treatment (ADT) on the risk of suicide is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine in a real-life setting whether ADT is associated with an increased or a reduced risk of suicide compared to absence of ADT (no-ADT) in patients with depression. METHOD: A decision analysis method was used to estimate the number of suicides prevented or induced by ADT in children and adolescents (10-19 years old), adults (20-64 years old) and the elderly (65 years) diagnosed with major depression. The impact of gender and parasuicide history on the findings was explored within each age group. Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the models. RESULTS: Prescribing ADT to all patients diagnosed with depression would prevent more than one out of three suicide deaths compared to the no-ADT strategy, irrespective of age, gender or parasuicide history. Sensitivity analyses showed that persistence in taking ADT would be the main characteristic influencing the effectiveness of ADT on suicide risk. CONCLUSIONS: Public health decisions that contribute directly or indirectly to reducing the number of patients with depression who are effectively administered ADT may paradoxically induce a rise in the number of suicides.

[Prescription practices of antipsychotic medication in early psychosis: a two-year follow-up survey of subjects admitted in two psychiatric hospitals of South-Western France]. / Pratiques de prescription des traitements antipsychotiques dans les premières hospitalisations pour épisode psychotique: étude sur une cohorte de patients hospitalisés dans deux hôpitaux girondins.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this pharmacoepidemiological study were to describe the antipsychotic medication received during the first admission and over a two-year follow-up in subjects with a first episode of psychosis, and to assess whether the prescriptions in naturalistic conditions were in adequacy with guidelines. METHOD: All first-admitted patients, less than 50 years old, consecutively hospitalised in 10 acute wards of two psychiatric hospitals serving Bordeaux's catchment area were included over a period of one year, if they presented with at least one overt psychotic symptom during the last month. Information on psychotropic medication received during the first admission was collected in medical records, and that received after the first admission was collected at the end of a two-year follow-up using multiple sources of information. RESULTS: Of the 86 patients included in the cohort, 53 presented with broadly defined schizophrenia and 33 with psychotic mood disorder. All except two subjects were prescribed at least one neuroleptic drug. Antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine) were the most frequently prescribed drugs during the first admission and over the two-year follow-up. If sedative neuroleptics were excluded, antipsychotic drugs were the first prescribed neuroleptic drugs in a large proportion (80%) of patients. Although few patients were first prescribed a conventional neuroleptic, the proportion of subjects treated with these drugs increased over the next prescriptions, and one out of three patients was prescribed at least one of these drugs during the follow-up. The mean dose of antipsychotic drugs at first discharge was higher than that recommended in first episode patients (amisulpride 616 mg, olanzapine 13 mg, risperidone 7 mg). Coprescription of neuroleptic drugs, found in one third of patients at all times of assessment, was especially due to coprescription of a sedative neuroleptic to a conventional or an antipsychotic one. Nearly half of the patients did not take any psychotropic medication at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSION: The main recommendation specifying that the first neuroleptic treatment in subjects with a first episode of psychosis should use antipsychotic drugs instead of conventional neuroleptics was generally respected in this cohort of first-admitted subjects with psychosis. However, conventional neuroleptics were found in first or second rank prescriptions, although they should not be used before at least the third rank. The recommendations that the initial neuroleptic dose should be lower in subjects with a first episode, and that coprescription of neuroleptics should be avoided, were frequently not respected. This study highlights the fact that international guidelines should be better applied in naturalistic conditions, and that clinicians have to be better informed about these recommendations.