Heart donation: the New Zealand experience, 1987-1996.

AIMS: To audit all donor hearts offered to our unit, assess the outcome, identify factors which might enhance the acceptance rate and provide data on which to base and modify acceptance criteria. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected retrospectively and analysed for all patients in whom brain death had been established and permission for organ donation obtained from the family prior to referral to the transplant donor coordinator. RESULTS: Over a nine year period (1987-96) 267 hearts were offered for transplantation. The mean donor age was 31.2 years (2-72), 163 being male and 104 female. The cause of death was secondary to trauma in 52%, neurological in 44% and due to hypoxia in 4%. The mean donor weight was 68 kg and the distribution of ABO blood group similar to the New Zealand population. Seventy-six hearts (28%) were implanted. Of the 191 not implanted no suitable recipient was available for 98 (51%) according to blood group and body weight criteria, 38 donors (20%) were medically unsuitable, 37 (19%) were declined because of donor age, 16 (8%) because of a markedly abnormal echocardiogram and 2 (1%) for logistical reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced efforts are needed to increase public awareness of the benefits of organ donation. However, a greater number of heart transplants may be achieved by increasing the recipient pool.

Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of the homograft aortic valve.

To determine the utility of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of the homograft valve in the aortic position, 27 patients with normally functioning valves (group 1) and 30 patients with suspected malfunctioning valves (group 2) were examined. Simultaneous cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography were performed in 23 group 2 patients. Doppler and surgical findings were compared in 7 patients too ill for invasive studies. In group 1 patients, the maximal velocity (+/- standard deviation) was 1.8 +/- 0.37 m/s, the mean pressure gradient was 7.1 +/- 3.07 mm Hg and the mean aortic valve area was 2.2 +/- 0.79 cm2. The maximal velocity in group 2 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) classified as moderate or greater was 2.5 +/- 0.55 m/s, compared with 1.8 +/- 0.44 m/s in patients with mild AR or less (p less than 0.01). In the quantitation of AR, pulsed-wave mapping and angiographic grades were identical in 18 patients and differed by 1 grade in 5. Seven patients too ill for catheterization had severe destruction of valve leaflets at cardiac surgery. In 6 patients, both Doppler grading methods suggested severe AR. In a seventh patient, who had an obstructed Starr-Edwards valve in the mitral position, AR was graded as mild by pulsed-wave mapping. Only 1 patient had homograft valve stenosis, with a withdrawal gradient at catheterization of 34 mm Hg and a Doppler maximal gradient of 36 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease.

We tested the hypotheses that Doppler echocardiography has a higher accuracy than clinical evaluation in the detection of significant aortic and mitral valvular heart disease and that Doppler echocardiography is highly accurate as compared with cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valvular disease severity. Thus, cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valve lesion severity may be unnecessary in selected patients. We prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients, ages 20-74 years (mean, 52 years), with clinically suspected valvular heart disease. Specific clinical and Doppler echocardiographic criteria were used to categorize each valve lesion as absent, insignificant, or significant. Criteria for a significant lesion at cardiac catheterization was an aortic or mitral valve area less than 1.1 or 1.5 cm2, respectively, or equal to or greater than 3+ cm2 aortic or mitral regurgitation at angiography. In all valve lesions, Doppler echocardiography had a higher overall accuracy than clinical evaluation. Increases in accuracies of 28%, 19%, 15%, and 7% occurred for mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, respectively, resulting in overall accuracies of 97%, 100%, 95%, and 96%. Clinical evaluation alone made 28 errors (37% of patients and 19% of valve lesions assessed), and 17 of these errors (23% of patients and 12% of valve lesions) would have resulted in inappropriate management. In only four (24%) of these 17 patients, the attending cardiologist would not have proceeded to assess the valve at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)