Effect of Preoperative Opioid Exposure on Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Following Elective Abdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which preoperative opioid use is correlated with healthcare utilization and costs following elective surgical procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Morbidity and mortality associated with prescription opioid use is escalating in the United States. The extent to which chronic opioid use influences postoperative outcomes following elective surgery is not well understood. METHODS: Truven Health Marketscan Databases were used to identify adult patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery between June 2009 and December 2012 (n = 200,005). Generalized linear regression was used to determine the effect of preoperative opioid use on postoperative healthcare utilization (length of stay, 30-d readmission, and discharge destination) and cost (hospital stay, 90-, 180-, and 365-d) after adjusting for number of comorbidities, psychological conditions, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: In this cohort, 8.8% of patients used opioids preoperatively. Compared with non-users, patients using opioids preoperatively were more likely to have a longer hospital stay (2.9 d vs. 2.5 d, P <0.001) and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (3.6% vs. 2.5%, P <0.001), adjusting for covariates. Preoperative opioid use was also correlated with a greater rate of 30-day readmission (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P <0.001) and overall greater expenditures at 90- ($12036.60 vs. $3863.40, P <0.001), 180- ($16973.70 vs. $6790.60, P <0.001), and 365- ($25495.70 vs. $12113.80, P <0.001) days following surgery, adjusted for covariates. Additionally, dose-effects were observed regarding readmission, discharge destination, and late healthcare expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative interventions focused on opioid cessation and alternative analgesics may improve the safety and efficiency of elective surgery among chronic opioid users.

Preoperative Opioid Use is Independently Associated With Increased Costs and Worse Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and financial implications of preoperative opioid use in major abdominal surgery. BACKGROUND: Opioids are increasingly used to manage chronic pain, and chronic opioid users are challenging to care for perioperatively. Given the epidemic of opioid-related morbidity and mortality, it is critical to understand how preoperative opioid use impacts surgical outcomes. METHODS: This was an analysis of nonemergent, abdominopelvic surgeries from 2008 to 2014 from a single center within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative clinical registry database. Preoperative opioid use (binary exposure variable) was retrospectively queried from the home medication list of the preoperative evaluation. Our primary outcome was 90-day total hospital costs. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, 30-day major complication rates, discharge destination, and 30-day hospital readmission rates. Analyses were risk-adjusted for case complexity and patient-specific risk factors such as demographics, insurance, smoking, comorbidities, and concurrent medication use. RESULTS: In all, 2413 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 502 patients (21%) used opioids preoperatively. After covariate adjustment, opioid users (compared with those who were opioid-naïve) had 9.2% higher costs [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8%-15.6%; adjusted means $26,604 vs $24,263; P = 0.005), 12.4% longer length of stay (95% CI 2.3%-23.5%; adjusted means 5.9 vs 5.2 days; P = 0.015), more complications (odds ratio 1.36; 95% CI 1.04-1.78; adjusted rates 20% vs 16%; P = 0.023), more readmissions (odds ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.08-2.29; adjusted rates 10% vs 6%; P = 0.018), and no difference in discharge destination (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid use is common before abdominopelvic surgery, and is independently associated with increased postoperative healthcare utilization and morbidity. Preoperative opioids represent a potentially modifiable risk factor and a novel target to improve quality and value of surgical care.

One-year postoperative resource utilization in sarcopenic patients.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that sarcopenic patients are at higher risk of postoperative complications and short-term health care utilization. Less well understood is how these patients fare over the long term after surviving the immediate postoperative period. We explored costs over the first postoperative year among sarcopenic patients. METHODS: We identified 1279 patients in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database who underwent inpatient elective surgery at a single institution from 2006-2011. Sarcopenia, defined by gender-stratified tertiles of lean psoas area, was determined from preoperative computed tomography scans using validated analytic morphomics. Data were analyzed to assess sarcopenia's relationship to costs, readmissions, discharge location, intensive care unit admissions, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Multivariate models were adjusted for patient demographics and surgical risk factors. RESULTS: Sarcopenia was independently associated with increased adjusted costs at 30, 90, and 180 but not 365 d. The difference in adjusted postsurgical costs between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients was $16,455 at 30 d and $14,093 at 1 y. Sarcopenic patients were more likely to be discharged somewhere other than home (P < 0.001). Sarcopenia was not an independent predictor of increased readmission rates in the postsurgical year. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of sarcopenia on health care costs are concentrated in the immediate postoperative period. It may be appropriate to allocate additional resources to sarcopenic patients in the perioperative setting to reduce the incidence of negative postoperative outcomes.

Quality of life in liver transplant candidates: frailty is a better indicator than severity of liver disease.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to understand the diminished quality of life (QoL) exhibited by patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), we studied the association of frailty and severity of liver disease with quality of life in this patient population. METHODS: In a prospective, single-center cohort study (N=487), we assessed frailty and QoL in patients with ESLD referred for liver transplant. Frailty was measured on a scale from 0 to 5 by grip strength, gait speed, exhaustion, shrinkage, and physical activity, with scores of 3 or higher characterized as frail. Physical, mental, and combined overall quality of life scores ranging from 0 to 100 were assessed using Short Form 36. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used to identify variables associated with QoL. RESULTS: Quality of life was notably low in the study cohort (mean: physical, 42.9±24.1; mental, 58.3±23.2). In multivariate analysis adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, frailty was significantly negative associated with physical (slope, -22.55, 95% confidence interval, -26.39 to -18.71; P<0.001) and mental QoL (slope, -17.59, 95% confidence interval, -21.47 to -13.71; P<0.001). Model for ESLD (MELD) was not associated with QoL. CONCLUSION: In ESLD patient referred for liver transplant, diminished QoL appears to be significantly negatively associated with frailty and not with severity of liver disease as measured MELD. With further study, if frailty is shown to be a remediable condition, targeted programs may help decrease frailty and improve quality of life in ESLD patients.

Paraspinous muscle as a predictor of surgical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Objective measures for preoperative risk assessment are needed to inform surgical risk stratification. Previous studies using preoperative imaging have shown that the psoas muscle is a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. Because psoas measurements are not always available, additional trunk muscles should be identified as alternative measures of risk assessment. Our research assessed the relationship between paraspinous muscle area, psoas muscle area, and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database, we retrospectively identified 1309 surgical patients who had preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scans within 90 d of operation. Analytic morphomic techniques were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the paraspinous muscle at the T12 vertebral level. The primary outcome was 1-y mortality. Analyses were stratified by sex, and logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between muscle area and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: The measurements of paraspinous muscle area at T12 were normally distributed. There was a strong correlation between paraspinous muscle area at T12 and total psoas area at L4 (r = 0.72, P <0.001). Paraspinous area was significantly associated with 1-y mortality in both females (odds ratio = 0.70 per standard deviation increase in paraspinous area, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.99, P = 0.046) and males (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Paraspinous muscle area correlates with psoas muscle area, and larger paraspinous muscle area is associated with lower mortality rates after surgery. This suggests that the paraspinous muscle may be an alternative to the psoas muscle in the context of objective measures of risk stratification.