Referrals to Community and State Agencies to Address Social Determinants of Health for Improving Mental Health, Functioning, and Quality of Care Outcomes for Diverse Adults.

Objectives. To examine whether referral for social determinants of health (SDH) needs decreases psychological distress and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and improves level of functioning and quality of care among diverse adults. Methods. Data are from control participants (n = 503 adults) in a randomized controlled trial testing a mental health intervention in North Carolina and Massachusetts. We fitted multilevel mixed-effects models to repeated assessments (baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months) collected between September 2019 and January 2023. Results. After referral to services for trouble paying utility bills, participants reported lower PTSD symptoms. Participants reported better quality of care when receiving referrals to mental health care. After adjusting for income and employment status, we found that participants who were referred more often also had lower PTSD symptoms and better levels of functioning. Conclusions. Referrals for certain SDH needs might decrease PTSD symptoms and improve self-reported quality of care and functioning. However, referrals alone, without ensuring receipt of services, might be insufficient to affect other mental health outcomes. Research is needed on training and providing care managers time for offering interpersonal support, securing services, and understanding agencies' contexts for addressing high SDH needs. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S3):S278-S288. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307442).

The association between patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance, working alliance, and length of treatment in behavioral health settings.

Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and providers concerning the quality of care has received interest over past decades yielding mixed results. Patients seem to prefer clinicians of their own race/ethnicity, but empirical studies have found small or inconsistent effects on the quality of care. Research on the impact of racial/ethnic concordance and treatment duration appears to suggest that racial/ethnic concordance is associated with retention and completion; however, exactly why racial/ethnic concordance improves treatment length remains unexplored. On the other side, the quality of working alliance is a well-established common factor underlying effective treatments. In this study, we examined the interaction between patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance, length of treatment in the therapeutic dyad, and working alliance as evaluated by both patients themselves and objective raters. The study included 312 patients and 74 providers from 13 community and hospital-based outpatient mental health clinics in Massachusetts. Results indicated that among racial/ethnic concordant therapeutic dyads, longer length of treatment was associated with better quality of working alliance as evaluated by objective raters. Implications for clinical practice and future research on racial/ethnic concordance studies linked to the length of treatment are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in mental health service use among emerging adults: community-level supply factors.

Objectives: Emerging adulthood-spanning 18-29 years of age-is associated with the highest risk for onset of certain behavioral health disorders (e.g. major depression, bipolar disorder, psychosis, substance use disorders) and high prevalence of many behavioral health disorders. Yet, rates of mental health service use remain low in this age range. Racial/ethnic minorities are particularly impacted by individual, cultural/linguistic, and community-level barriers to mental health care. This study examined community-level factors associated with mental health service use and investigated whether these associations varied by race/ethnicity.Design: This study analyzed individual- and county-level data for emerging adults in the United States (N=3,294) from the nationally representative Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiological Surveys (CPES). Using the Andersen Model of Health Care Utilization, analyses examined predisposing, enabling, and need factors utilized in prior studies with adult samples as well as novel community characteristics hypothesized to impact service use among emerging adults of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. Past-year use of both specialty and any mental health services were assessed, controlling for individual- and community-level variables, and adjusting for presence of past-year mental health disorder, overall health status, and functional impairment. Differences between racial/ethnic minority groups and Non-Latino Whites were tested through a multilevel model incorporating random intercepts logistic regression, with analysis focusing on the interaction between race/ethnicity and community-level supply variables.Results: For past-year use of specialty mental health services, density of hospitals with child wellness programs was linked to service use among Black emerging adults, whereas density of hospitals with linguistic/translation services was linked to service use among Latino emerging adults.Conclusions: This study expands on previous research in behavioral health disparities to examine ways to improve behavioral health services for an emerging adult population with unmet service needs and identifies specific community-level factors that can improve mental health for racial/ethnic minority emerging adults.

Measurement Invariance of Screening Measures of Anxiety, Depression, and Level of Functioning in a US Sample of Minority Older Adults Assessed in Four Languages.

Population aging in the US and its increase in racial/ethnic diversity has resulted in a growing body of literature aimed at measuring health disparities among minority older adults. Disparities in health outcomes are often evaluated using self-reported measures and, to attend to linguistic diversity, these measures are increasingly being used in languages for which they were not originally developed and validated. However, observed differences in self-reported measures cannot be used to infer disparities in theoretical attributes, such as late-life depression, unless there is evidence that individuals from different groups responded similarly to the measures-a property known as measurement invariance. Using data from the Positive Minds-Strong Bodies randomized controlled trial, which delivered evidence-based mental health and disability prevention services to a racially/ethnically diverse sample of minority older adults, we applied invariance tests to two common measures of anxiety and depression (the GAD-7 and the HSCL-25) and two measures of level of functioning (the Late-Life FDI and the WHODAS 2.0) comparing four different languages: English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese. We found that these measures were conceptualized similarly across languages. However, at the item-level symptom burden, we identified a non-negligible number of symptoms with some degree of differential item functioning. Spanish speakers reported more worry symptoms and less somatic symptoms for reasons unrelated to their psychological distress. Mandarin speakers reported more feelings of restlessness, and both Mandarin and Cantonese speakers reported no interest in things more often for reasons unrelated to their psychological distress. Mandarin and Cantonese speakers were also found to consistently report more difficulties performing physical activities for reasons unrelated to their level of functioning. In general, invariance tests have been insufficiently applied within psychological research, but they are particularly relevant as a prerequisite to accurately measure health disparities. Our results highlight the importance of conducting invariance testing, as we singled out several items that may require careful examination before considering their use to compare symptoms of psychological distress and level of functioning among ethnically and linguistically diverse older adult populations.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Depression Treatment for Caregivers Investigated by the US Child Welfare System.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are racial/ethnic differences in depression treatment for caregivers investigated by the US child welfare system. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the Second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being, a nationally representative sample of children and caregivers investigated by US child welfare agencies (February 2008-April 2009). We included permanent caregivers who met criteria for major depression and had available covariate data (n = 908). In multivariable logistic regression models, we estimated the associations between caregiver race/ethnicity and past-year receipt of: any depression treatment, minimally adequate depression treatment, and depression treatment from 4 sectors (general medical, psychiatry, nonpsychiatry mental health, and human services). We controlled for clinical need and access variables according to the Institute of Medicine's definition of health care disparities. RESULTS: Black caregivers had the lowest rates of treatment receipt of any racial/ethnic group, with 42.2% receiving any depression treatment and 17.2% receiving minimally adequate depression treatment in the past year. In multivariable analyses controlling for clinical need and access variables, Black caregivers were less likely than White caregivers to receive any depression treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.97]), minimally adequate depression treatment (OR = 0.37 [95% CI: 0.16-0.85]), and depression treatment from the general medical sector (OR = 0.40 [95% CI: 0.18-0.89]) in the past year (all P< .05). CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine the underlying mechanisms of Black-White disparities in depression treatment for caregivers involved with the US child welfare system and develop targeted interventions to promote equitable mental health care for this highly vulnerable population.

Associations Between Trauma, Sleep, and Cognitive Impairment Among Latino and Asian Older Adults.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Trauma survivors with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been found to have cognitive impairment. But little is known about these outcomes among Latino and Asians who comprise more than 80% of the U.S. immigrant population. They also experience disparities in PTSD and dementia care albeit increased exposure to trauma. This study aimed to (1) examine the association between trauma exposures and PTSD with cognitive impairment in a sample of Latino and Asian older adults; and (2) assess whether sleep quality attenuated the PTSD-cognitive impairment association. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data from the Positive Minds-Strong Bodies randomized controlled trial on disability prevention. SETTING: Community-based organizations serving minority or immigrant older adults in Massachusetts, New York, Florida, or Puerto Rico. PARTICIPANTS: Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander adults aged 60 or older eligible per randomized controlled trial screening for elevated mood symptoms and minor-to-moderate physical dysfunction (n = 134 and n = 86, respectively). MEASUREMENTS: Neuropsychiatric measures were cognitive impairment (Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)), PTSD (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5), trauma exposure (Brief Trauma Questionnaire), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), generalized anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale). RESULTS: Mean age was 72.8 years and 77.5 years for the Latino and Asian groups, respectively. The Asian group was 100% immigrant, whereas 70.2% (n = 92) of the Latino group was foreign-born. In unadjusted models, higher Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 scores were associated with decreased odds of normal cognitive functioning (MoCA ≥25) in the Asian group (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = .93 (.87, .99)), but not the Latino group (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = .99 (.95, 1.05)). This association remained significant after adjusting for covariates. Daytime sleepiness did not moderate the association between PTSD and cognitive functioning in the Asian group. CONCLUSION: Higher PTSD symptoms were associated with cognitive impairment in Asian, but not Latino, older adults. Clinicians serving older Asians should integrate trauma and cognitive screening to ensure this growing, underserved population receives appropriate evidence-based treatments.

Effectiveness of a Disability Preventive Intervention for Minority and Immigrant Elders: The Positive Minds-Strong Bodies Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the acceptability and effectiveness of a disability prevention intervention, Positive Minds-Strong Bodies (PMSB), offered by paraprofessionals to mostly immigrant elders in four languages. DESIGN: Randomized trial of 307 participants, equally randomized into intervention or enhanced usual care. SETTING: Community-based organizations in Massachusetts, New York, Florida, and Puerto Rico serving minority elders. Data collected at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months, between May 2015 and March 2019. PARTICIPANTS: English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, or Cantonese-speaking adults, age 60+, not seeking disability prevention services, but eligible per elevated mood symptoms and minor to moderate physical dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: Ten individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (PM) concurrently offered with 36 group sessions of strengthening exercise training (SB) over 6 months compared to enhanced usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Acceptability defined as satisfaction and attendance to >50% of sessions. Effectiveness determined by changes in mood symptoms (HSCL-25 and GAD-7), functional performance (SPPB), self-reported disability (LLFDI), and disability days (WHODAS 2.0). RESULTS: Around 77.6% of intervention participants attended over half of PM Sessions; 53.4% attended over half of SB sessions. Intent-to-treat analyses at 6 months showed significant intervention effects: improved functioning per SPPB and LLFDI, and lowered mood symptoms per HSCL-25. Intent-to-treat analyses at 12 months showed that effects remained significant for LLFDI and HSCL-25, and disability days (per WHODAS 2.0) significantly decreased 6-month after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: PMSB offered by paraprofessionals in community-based organizations demonstrates good acceptability and seems to improve functioning, with a compliance-benefit effect showing compliance as an important determinant of the intervention response.