The influence of a Vascular Surgery Hospitalist program on physician and patient satisfaction, resident education, and resource utilization.

A number of surgery practice models have been developed to address general and trauma surgeon workforce shortages and on-call issues and to improve surgeon satisfaction. These include the creation of acute or urgent care surgery services and "surgical hospitalist" programs. To date, no practice models corresponding to those developed for general and trauma surgeons have been proposed to address these same issues among vascular surgeons or other surgical subspecialists. In 2003, our practice established a Vascular Surgery Hospitalist program. Since its inception nearly a decade ago, it has undergone several modifications. We reviewed hospital administrative databases and surveys of faculty, residents, and patients to evaluate the program's impact. Benefits of the Vascular Surgery Hospitalist program include improved surgeon satisfaction, resource utilization, timeliness of patient care, communication among referring physicians and ancillary staff, and resident teaching/supervision. Elements of this program may be applicable to a variety of surgical subspecialty settings.

The value of a carotid duplex surveillance program for stroke prevention.

BACKGROUND: Although duplex ultrasonography (DU) can readily identify progression of carotid stenosis, controversy regarding the natural history of asymptomatic carotid stenosis as well as the need and appropriate interval for carotid DU surveillance still exists. Furthermore, consensus has not yet been made in the surgical literature regarding the usefulness, cost-effectiveness, or timing of DU surveillance after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to determine how often DU surveillance for asymptomatic carotid disease or postintervention stenosis resulted in any change in the patient's clinical management, how many strokes were prevented by DU surveillance, and the cost of such a DU surveillance program per stroke prevented. METHODS: We reviewed a 9-year vascular surgical database to identify all patients enrolled in a carotid DU surveillance program for asymptomatic carotid stenosis or following CEA between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. The number of duplex scans and CEAs performed in those patients through March 2010 was also determined. The results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study were then used to estimate the number of strokes prevented by CEA in the study population. Reimbursement data were assessed to calculate the average cost of each DU and the cost of the DU surveillance program for each stroke prevented. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 11,531 carotid duplex scans performed on 3,003 patients (mean: 3.84 scans per patient) who had been enrolled in the DU surveillance program. CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis was performed on 225 (7.5%) patients. The DU surveillance program prevented approximately 13 strokes (871 carotid duplex scans per stroke prevented). The mean cost of each duplex scan was $332 ± 170. The total cost of the DU surveillance program was approximately $3,830,000 or $290,000 per stroke prevented. CONCLUSIONS: Although a carotid DU surveillance program generates substantial revenue for a vascular surgery practice, it is costly and inefficient. A reappraisal of the "value" of carotid DU surveillance in stroke prevention is warranted. Consideration should be given to eliminating routine surveillance of postendarterectomy carotids in the absence of contralateral disease and limiting the number of DU surveillance studies for asymptomatic carotid disease.

Outcome of the use of stent grafts to salvage failed arteriovenous accesses.

BACKGROUND: Since elements of the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) were implemented a decade ago, there has been a reduction in mortality for patients on hemodialysis. As patient longevity has increased, AV access site preservation by salvaging failed arteriovenous (AV) accesses has become increasingly important. However, efforts to salvage an AV access must be balanced against futile and expensive procedures. The Viabahn Endoprosthesis is a self-expandable stent graft (SG) that can be used to treat vein rupture or fibrotic lesions with significant elastic recoil following balloon angioplasty. The literature comprising the outcome of the use of SGs in salvaging failed AV accesses is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine the outcome of failed AV accesses treated with SGs and to identify patient or graft factors predictive of success. METHODS: The vascular access database and office, hospital, and dialysis unit records were retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who underwent placement of an SG for the treatment of a thrombosed AV access between September 2004 and December 2007. Mean patient follow-up was 6 months. The K/DOQI goal for patency following a surgical intervention (6 months or later) was used to determine procedure success or failure. Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to determine patency. Patient demographics and graft factors (location, diameter, length) were analyzed to identify predictors of success. RESULTS: Fifty-five SGs were placed in 48 patients (males, 29%; mean age, 61 years; diabetes mellitus, 47%) with a failed AV access. The indications were to treat significant elastic recoil or vein rupture following balloon angioplasty (47 patients) and to treat an AV graft seroma (1 patient). Cost for the VE ranged from $2337 to $3367 per patient. The procedure was deemed successful (patent at 6 months) in 29 + or - 7% of cases. Procedure success was not influenced by AV access location, endoprosthesis size (diameter or length), or patient demographic factors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of the SG to salvage AV accesses falls short of the current K/DOQI clinical outcome goals for successful surgical intervention in the majority of cases. Given these results and the cost of the SG, its use is indicated in cases where AV access salvage will have an impact on long-term survival such as for patients in whom there are few options for new access placement. Further studies are needed to compare the SG to less costly options, such as angioplasty alone or angioplasty with the use of bare metal stents.

Effects of increased vascular surgical specialization on general surgery trainees, practicing surgeons, and the provision of vascular surgical care.

BACKGROUND: Vascular surgical education for general surgery residents is concerning as endovascular interventions increase and vascular surgery expands. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects these factors have on vascular surgery case numbers for general surgery residents and statewide surgeons and to report on former general surgery residents' perceptions of vascular surgery in training and practice. STUDY DESIGN: Case numbers for all general surgery residents graduating from the Greenville Hospital System from 1991 to 2007 and for the vascular surgery fellows graduating from 2003 to 2007 were obtained. A database identified case numbers and physician specialty for vascular procedures from 1997 through 2006. A survey gained perspectives of graduated general surgery residents on the vascular experience during residency and practice and on postresidency vascular caseload. RESULTS: There was significant decline in resident participation in open abdominal aortic aneurysm (22.4 versus 7.7), carotid endarterectomy (37.2 versus 31.1), aortobifemoral bypass (18.6 versus 5.5), and lower extremity bypass (42.8 versus 19.1). Numbers for dialysis access creation (49.0 versus 57.1) were maintained. Statewide, comparing 1997 with 2006, the percentages of procedures performed by vascular surgeons were: abdominal aortic aneurysm (29.3% versus 49%; p < 0.001), carotid endarterectomy (28.9% versus 45.5%; p < 0.001), and dialysis access (4.6% versus 12.3%; p=0.020). The survey of general surgery graduates revealed lower extremity bypass, carotid endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and dialysis access are important in training. Dialysis access was the most common operation performed by the general surgery graduates. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend toward vascular surgeons and vascular residents performing most open vascular cases. Currently practicing surgeons believe there is value to vascular exposure for general surgeons in training, and vascular surgery should remain in general surgery training.

Surgical revascularization in patients with end-stage renal disease: results using a new paradigm in outcomes assessment.

Studies evaluating the outcome of surgical revascularization (SR) for critical limb ischemia in patients who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have differed widely in their findings and conclusions. Differences in definitions of success are largely responsible for the varying outcomes. We developed a method of outcomes assessment that incorporates four all-inclusive endpoints to define success. These include primary graft patency to the point of wound healing, postoperative survival of at least 6 months, limb salvage of at least 1 year, and maintenance of ambulatory status of at least 6 months. The purpose of this study was to use this novel method of defining success to determine the outcome of SR in patients with ESRD. From 1998 to 2004, 40 patients (52 limbs) with ESRD and tissue loss underwent SR for limb salvage. Secondary graft patency and limb salvage rates at 36 months were 54.7 per cent and 53 per cent, respectively. When considering each of the four components used to define success separately, success encouragingly ranged between 60 per cent (patent graft until wound healing) and 87.5 per cent (survival for 6 months). However, if all parameters were combined, clinical success was achieved in only 40 per cent (16/40) of patients. Coronary artery disease was the only factor found to significantly reduce success (P = 0.04). In conclusion, using this multiparameter definition of success, which combines four rather modest outcome milestones, favorable outcome occurred in the minority of cases. This study challenges our current method of analyzing success and questions our therapeutic approach to patients with critical limb ischemia and ESRD.

Critical analysis of clinical success after surgical bypass for lower-extremity ischemic tissue loss using a standardized definition combining multiple parameters: a new paradigm of outcomes assessment.

BACKGROUND: Success after surgical revascularization of the lower extremities, traditionally defined by graft patency or limb salvage, fails to consider other intuitive measures of importance. The purpose of the study was to construct a more comprehensive definition of clinical success and to identify clinical predictors of failure. STUDY DESIGN: For the purpose of this study, clinical success was defined as achieving all of the following criteria: graft patency to the point of wound healing; limb salvage for 1 year; maintenance of ambulatory status for 1 year; and survival for 6 months. Between 1998 and 2004, 331 consecutive patients undergoing bypass for Rutherford III critical limb ischemia were measured for clinical success. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine demographic differences between success and failure. RESULTS: Despite achieving acceptable graft patency (72.7% at 36 months) and limb salvage (73.3% at 36 months), clinical success combining all 4 defined parameters was only 44.4%. Independent predictors of failure included impaired ambulatory status at presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 6.44), presence of infrainguinal disease (OR = 3.93), end-stage renal disease (OR = 2.48), presence of gangrene (OR = 2.40), and hyperlipidemia (OR = 0.56). Probability of failure in patients possessing every predictor except hyperlipidemia at presentation was 97% (OR = 150.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite achieving acceptable graft patency and limb salvage, fewer than half of the patients achieved success when using a definition combining multiple parameters. A reappraisal of our current approach to critical limb ischemia in certain high-risk patients is warranted.