Therapists' perspectives on access to telemental health among Medicaid-enrolled youth.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated risk for poor mental health (MH) outcomes among youth from low-income families and propelled a shift to telemental health. Yet, little is known about barriers to and facilitators of MH care access when services are delivered via synchronous telehealth to Medicaid-enrolled youth. STUDY DESIGN: Between December 2020 and March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 19 therapists from a large safety-net organization who served Medicaid-enrolled youth (< 18 years of age) to elucidate their perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of access to telemental health services among this population. METHODS: We conducted a thematic content analysis, guided by the 5 dimensions of health care access identified by Fortney and colleagues: geographical, temporal, digital, cultural (including acceptability of services), and financial access. RESULTS: Therapists noted that when components of digital access are met (ie, access to hardware and software, connectivity, and technological literacy), then telehealth could facilitate temporal access and eliminate geographic barriers; elimination of these barriers was particularly beneficial for youth in rural and hard-to-reach communities. Notably, many families depended on smartphones for telemental health access, and many youth depended on their caregiver's smartphone. When considering acceptability of services, some youth preferred in-person services, whereas other youth (especially some teenagers with high technological literacy) had a preference for telemental health. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the need for flexibility in reimbursement policies that allows providers to optimize MH care access by offering telehealth delivered via telephone and video as well as in-person services, depending on the needs and preferences of youth and families.

State-Level Variation in Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment and Specialty Care for Publicly Insured Children.

Importance: Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program cover almost 50% of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). CSHCN often require specialty services and have been increasingly enrolled in Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans, but there is a dearth of recent national studies on specialty care access among publicly insured children and particularly CSHCN. Objective: To provide recent, nationwide evidence on the association of MMC penetration with specialty care access among publicly insured children, with a special focus on CSHCN. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from the 2016 to 2019 National Survey of Children's Health to identify publicly insured children in 41 states that administered comprehensive managed care organizations for Medicaid. Data analysis was performed from May 2022 to March 2023. Exposure: Form CMS-416 data were used to measure state-year level share of Medicaid-enrolled children who were covered by MMC (ie, MMC penetration). Main Outcomes and Measures: Measures of specialty care access included whether, in the past year, the child had (1) any visit to non-mental health (MH) specialists, (2) any visit to MH professionals, and (3) any unmet health care needs and (4) whether the caregiver ever felt frustrated getting services for their child. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of MMC penetration with specialty care access among all publicly insured children, and separately for CSHCN and non-CSHCN. Results: Among 20 029 publicly insured children, 7164 (35.8%) were CSHCN, 9537 (48.2%) were female, 4110 (37.2%) were caregiver-reported Hispanic, and 2812 (21.4%) were caregiver-reported non-Hispanic Black (all percentages are weighted). MMC was not associated with significant changes in any visit to non-MH specialists and unmet health care needs. In addition, MMC penetration was positively associated with caregiver frustration among all children (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.48; P = .02) and was negatively associated with any visit to MH professionals among CSHCN (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study evaluating MMC and specialty care access for publicly insured children, increased MMC enrollment was not associated with improved specialty care access for publicly insured children, including CSHCN. MMC was associated with less access to specialties like MH and increased frustrations among caregivers seeking services for their children.

Challenges facing mental health systems arising from the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 14 European and North American countries.

We assessed challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic presented for mental health systems and the responses to these challenges in 14 countries in Europe and North America. Experts from each country filled out a structured questionnaire with closed- and open-ended questions between January and June 2021. We conducted thematic analysis to investigate the qualitative responses to open-ended questions, and we summarized the responses to closed-ended survey items on changes in telemental health policies and regulations. Findings revealed that many countries grappled with the rising demand for mental health services against a backdrop of mental health provider shortages and challenges responding to workforce stress and burnout. All countries in our sample implemented new policies or initiatives to strengthen mental health service delivery - with more than two-thirds investing to bolster their specialized mental health care sector. There was a universal shift to telehealth to deliver a larger portion of mental health services in all 14 countries, which was facilitated by changes in national regulations and policies; 11 of the 14 participating countries relaxed regulations and 10 of 14 countries made changes to reimbursement policies to facilitate telemental health care. These findings provide a first step to assess the long-term challenges and re-organizational effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health systems in Europe and North America.

Evaluating Medicaid Managed Care Network Adequacy Standards And Associations With Specialty Care Access For Children.

Medicaid managed care plans cover more than 80 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children, including many children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Federal rules require states to set network adequacy standards to improve specialty care access for Medicaid managed care enrollees. Using a quasi-experimental design and 2016-19 National Survey of Children's Health data, we examined the association between quantitative network adequacy standards and access to specialty care among 8,614 Medicaid-enrolled children, including 3,157 with special health care needs, in eighteen states. Outcomes included whether the child had any visit to non-mental health specialists, any visit to mental health professionals, or any unmet health care needs and whether the caregiver ever felt frustrated in getting services for the child in the past year. We observed no association between the adoption of any quantitative network adequacy standard and the above outcomes among Medicaid-enrolled children. Among CSHCN, however, adopting any quantitative standard was positively associated with caregivers feeling frustrated in getting services for the child, especially among CSHCN who visited non-mental health specialists. Without additional interventions, adopting new network adequacy standards may have unintended consequences for CSHCN.

Stakeholder perspectives on the advantages and challenges of expanded school mental health services for publically-insured youth.

Although partnerships between community-based mental health (MH) organizations and school systems to deliver MH services on school grounds (i.e., expanded school mental health, ESMH services) are growing, qualitative research is needed about stakeholders' perspectives on ESMH services. This study collected qualitative data from caregivers, MH providers, and MH administrators recruited from three MH organizations to understand their perspectives regarding potential advantages and challenges associated with ESMH services. The three MH organizations were located in three regions of Georgia and the majority of youth served by the organizations were enrolled in Medicaid. We conducted four focus groups with 33 caregivers and 13 semistructured interviews with MH administrators and providers, and we implemented a thematic content analysis. Caregivers, providers, and MH administrators described how ESMH services could improve MH services by (a) facilitating appointment attendance through the reduction of logistical barriers to care (including geographic barriers, missed class time, and missed work time) and (b) enhancing communication between providers and teachers. However, some participants also described logistical issues with ESMH services including school space constraints and challenges scheduling appointments. In addition, some caregivers expressed concerns about peer stigma if MH services are delivered at school (vs. the clinic). Providers and MH administrators discussed problems with low caregiver engagement and challenges collaborating with school personnel that stem from lack of understanding of MH problems and treatment. Although ESMH services can improve MH treatment among low-income youth, MH providers and MH administrators may consider collaborating with school personnel to proactively develop strategies to address challenges to its success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Mental Health Clinic Administrators' Perspectives on the Impact of Clinic-School Partnerships on Youth Mental Health Services Continuity and Quality.

Partnerships between mental health (MH) clinics and school systems in which providers deliver MH services on school grounds are growing. To date, however, there is little research examining MH clinic administrator perspectives on how this service delivery model affects continuity and quality of MH services among low-income youth. We conducted a state-wide (online and mail) survey of administrators at MH clinics (n = 60) to assess their perspectives on the advantages and challenges of school MH services for Medicaid-enrolled youth. Among survey respondents (n = 44), 86% reported that their clinic had at least one school partnership. With respect to advantages, more than four-fifths reported that school-based MH services (compared to clinic-based services) were very helpful or extremely helpful (versus not helpful at all, a little helpful, or somewhat helpful) for: (1) reducing gaps in MH treatment (86.8%); (2) improving communication between MH providers and teachers (86.9%), and (3) improving the overall quality of MH care (89.5%). In addition, the estimated no-show rate for appointments in school settings (7.2%) was lower than the estimated no show-rate for clinic appointments (23.9%; p < 0.01). Several challenges were also reported; more than two-thirds of respondents reported difficulties when delivering school-based services related to parent engagement (i.e., appointment attendance [89.5%], communication [81.6%], timely consent [68.4%]) that occurred sometimes, often, or always (versus rarely or never). As MH clinics continue to enter into and expand partnerships with schools, stakeholders should implement family-centered strategies to enhance engagement. Nevertheless, MH clinic administrators highlight potential benefits of school MH services (compared to clinic-based services) with respect to continuity and quality of MH care.

National Estimates of Mental Health Needs Among Adults With Self-Reported CKD in the United States.

Introduction: Among adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), comorbid mental illness is associated with poorer health outcomes and can impede access to transplantation. We provide the first US nationally representative estimates of the prevalence of mental illness and mental health (MH) treatment receipt among adults with self-reported CKD. Methods: Using 2015 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data, we conducted an observational study of 152,069 adults (age ≥22 years) reporting CKD (n = 2544), with no reported chronic conditions (n = 117,235), or reporting hypertension (HTN) or diabetes mellitus (DM) but not CKD (HTN/DM, n = 32,290). We compared prevalence of (past-year) any mental illness, serious mental illness (SMI), MH treatment, and unmet MH care needs across the groups using logistic regression models. Results: Approximately 26.6% of US adults reporting CKD also had mental illness, including 7.1% with SMI. When adjusting for individual characteristics, adults reporting CKD were 15.4 percentage points (PPs) and 7.3 PPs more likely than adults reporting no chronic conditions or HTN/DM to have any mental illness (P < 0.001) and 5.6 PPs (P < 0.001) and 2.2 PPs (P = 0.01) more likely to have SMI, respectively. Adults reporting CKD were also more likely to receive any MH treatment (21% vs. 12%, 18%, respectively) and to have unmet MH care needs (6% vs. 3%, 5%, respectively). Conclusion: Mental illness is common among US adults reporting CKD. Enhanced management of MH needs could improve treatment outcomes and quality-of-life downstream.

Association Between In-Home Treatment and Engagement in Psychosocial Services Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have identified low rates of engagement in mental health (MH) services in clinic settings among children enrolled in Medicaid. Yet, little is known about whether the delivery of in-home MH treatment (in which the clinician travels to the child's home) improves engagement for this population. This study examines the association between the delivery of in-home psychosocial treatment and engagement in services among Medicaid-enrolled youth. METHOD: We used 2010 to 2014 Georgia Medicaid claims data to identify 53,508 children and adolescents (aged 5-17 years) with a MH diagnosis that initiated new psychosocial treatment. We estimated regression models controlling for covariates to examine the relationship of the receipt of any in-home psychosocial treatment in the home setting with 3 outcome measures of engagement: receipt of at least 4 psychosocial visits during the first 12 weeks; total number of psychosocial visits during the first 12 weeks; and total duration of service use. RESULTS: Those who received any in-home psychosocial treatment (compared to those who did not) had 4.3 times the odds (odds ratio = 4.3, 95% CI = 4.0, 4.7) of receiving at least 4 visits during the first 12 weeks, had 4.5 (95% CI = 4.3, 4.7) more predicted visits during the first 12 weeks, and had a longer treatment episode duration (mean rate ratio = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.48,1.59). CONCLUSION: Although many Medicaid-enrolled youth do not receive a sufficient number of MH services to achieve positive outcomes, our findings suggest that providing in-home psychosocial treatment can improve service engagement and potentially help address this challenge.

Medicaid expansion and opioid overdose mortality among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in the US: A difference in differences analysis.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-related overdoses are a major cause of mortality in the US. Medicaid Expansion is posited to reduce opioid overdose-related mortality (OORM), and may have a particularly strong effect among people of lower socioeconomic status. This study assessed the association between state Medicaid Expansion and county-level OORM rates among individuals with low educational attainment. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study used lagged multilevel difference-in-difference models to test the relationship of state Medicaid Expansion to county-level OORM rates among people with a high-school diploma or less. Longitudinal (2008-2018) OORM data on 2978 counties nested in 48 states and the District of Columbia (DC) were drawn from the National Center for Health Statistics. The state-level exposure was a time-varying binary-coded variable capturing pre- and post-Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act (an "on switch"-type variable). The main outcome was annual county-level OORM rates among low-education adults adjusted for potential underreporting of OORM. FINDINGS: The adjusted county-level OORM rates per 100,000 among the study population rose on average from 10.26 (SD = 13.56) in 2008-14.51 (SD = 18.20) in 2018. In the 1-year lagged multivariable model that controlled for policy and sociodemographic covariates, the association between state Medicaid Expansion and county-level OORM rates was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that expanding Medicaid eligibility reduced OORM rates among adults with lower educational attainment. Future work should seek to corroborate our findings and also identify - and repair - breakdowns in mechanisms that should link Medicaid Expansion to reduced overdoses.

National estimates of mental health service use and unmet needs among adult cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors are at elevated risk for developing mental health (MH) disorders. This study assessed MH service use and unmet service needs among a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors. METHODS: Respondents aged 18 to 64 years were identified from the 2015-2018 National Survey of Drug Use and Health data. Outcomes assessed past-year MH service use and self-reported unmet MH needs. Outcomes were compared between respondents who reported a cancer history (survivors) and those who did not (controls), descriptively and in adjusted analyses controlling for sociodemographic factors and health status. Analyses were stratified by age groups (18-34, 35-49, and 50-64 years). RESULTS: Comparing 3540 survivors with 149,843 controls, within each age group, a higher proportion of survivors than controls received any MH service (P values < .05); this difference persisted among those aged 35 to 49 years (P = .004) in fully adjusted models. Moreover, a higher proportion of survivors than controls reported an unmet need for MH care; this difference was larger among young adults aged 18 to 34 years (20.8% vs 9.0%; P < .001) than those aged 35 to 49 years (9.4% vs 5.3%; P < .001) and 50 to 64 years (4.8% vs 3.4%; P = .029). In fully adjusted models, the survivor-control difference in self-reported unmet MH needs persisted among young adults (24% relative increase; P = .023). Among cancer survivors, young adult survivors had the highest likelihood of reporting unmet MH needs. CONCLUSIONS: This nationally representative study found an increased perception of unmet needs for MH care among cancer survivors, particularly among young adult survivors, compared with the general population without cancer.

The impact of urgent care centers on nonemergent emergency department visits.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of urgent care centers on emergency department (ED) use. DATA SOURCES: Secondary data from a novel urgent care center database, linked to the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) from six states. STUDY DESIGN: We used a difference-in-differences design to examine ZIP code-level changes in the acuity mix of emergency department visits when local urgent care centers were open versus closed. ZIP codes with no urgent care centers served as a control group. We tested for differential impacts of urgent care centers according to ED wait time and patient insurance status. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Urgent care center daily operating times were determined via the urgent care center database. Emergency department visit acuity was assessed by applying the NYU ED algorithm to the SEDD data. Urgent care locations and nearby emergency department encounters were linked via zip code. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found that having an open urgent care center in a ZIP code reduced the total number of ED visits by residents in that ZIP code by 17.2% (P < 0.05), due largely to decreases in visits for less emergent conditions. This effect was concentrated among visits to EDs with the longest wait times. We found that urgent care centers reduced the total number of uninsured and Medicaid visits to the ED by 21% (P < 0.05) and 29.1% (P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: During the hours they are open, urgent care centers appear to be treating patients who otherwise would have visited the ED. This suggests that urgent care centers have the potential to reduce health care expenditures, though questions remain about their net cost impact. Future work should assess whether urgent care centers can improve health care access among populations that often experience barriers to receiving timely care.

Developing Regional Mental Health Priorities: Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment of Eight States in the Southeastern United States.

State mental health agencies (SMHAs), which provide a variety of services to meet their residents' mental health needs, typically work within their own state, with little opportunity for cross-state collaboration and information exchange. This column describes a mixed-methods needs assessment conducted by the Southeast Mental Health Technology Transfer Center (MHTTC) to identify regional mental health priorities in eight states of the southeastern United States. The six priority areas identified were mental health workforce, school-based mental health, suicide prevention, peer workforce, criminal justice and mental health, and supported housing. These regional priorities inform the Southeast MHTTC's activities and can be used to promote collaborative exchange and problem solving among SMHAs.

Provider-Level Caseload of Psychosocial Services for Medicaid-Insured Children.

OBJECTIVE: We estimated the caseload of providers, practices, and clinics for psychosocial services (including psychotherapy) to Medicaid-insured children to improve the understanding of the current supply of such services and to inform opportunities to increase their accessibility. METHODS: We used 2012-2013 Medicaid claims data and data from the 2013 National Plan and Provider Enumeration System to identify and locate therapists, psychiatrists, and mental health centers along with primary, rehabilitative, and developmental care providers in the United States who provided psychosocial services to Medicaid-insured children. We estimated the per-provider, per-location, and state-level caseloads of providers offering these services to Medicaid-insured children in 34 states with sufficiently complete data to perform this analysis, by using the most recent year of Medicaid claims data available for each state. We measured caseload by calculating the number of psychosocial visits delivered by each provider in the selected year. We compared caseloads across states, urbanicity, provider specialty (eg, psychiatry, psychology, primary care), and practice setting (eg, mental health center, single practitioner). RESULTS: We identified 63 314 providers, practices, or centers in the Medicaid claims data that provided psychosocial services to Medicaid-insured children in either 2012 or 2013. The median provider-level per-year caseload was <25 children and <250 visits across all provider types. Providers with a mental health center-related taxonomy accounted for >40% of visits for >30% of patients. Fewer than 10% of providers and locations accounted for >50% of patients and visits. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial services are concentrated in a few locations, thereby reducing geographic accessibility of providers. Providers should be incentivized to offer care in more locations and to accept more Medicaid-insured patients.

Mental Health Service Use by Medicaid-Enrolled Children and Adolescents in Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the role of primary care safety-net clinics, including federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics, in providing mental health services to youths. This study examined correlates and quality of mental health care for youths treated in these settings. METHODS: Medicaid claims data (2008-2010) from nine states were used to identify youths initiating medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (N=6,433) and youths with an incident depression diagnosis (N=13,209). The authors identified youths who received no ADHD or depression-related visits in a primary care safety-net clinic, some (but less than most) visits in these clinics, and most visits in these clinics. Using bivariate and regression analyses, they examined correlates of mental health treatment in these settings and whether mental health visits in these settings were associated with quality measures. RESULTS: Only 13.5% of the ADHD cohort and 7.2% of the depression cohort sought any ADHD- or depression-related visits in primary care safety-net clinics. Residence in a county with a higher (versus lower) percentage of residents living in an urban area was negatively associated with receiving the majority of mental health visits in these settings (p<0.05). Compared with youths with no visits in these settings, youths who received most of their mental health treatment in these settings received lower-quality care on five of six measures (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As investment in the expansion of mental health services in primary care safety-net clinics grows, future research should assess whether these resources translate into improved mental health care access and quality for Medicaid-enrolled youths.

Medicaid Managed Care and Providers' Perceptions of Quality of Care for Children with Chronic Conditions in Georgia.

Medicaid managed care plans employ cost containment tools such as prior authorization and preferred drug lists to achieve cost savings. Little is known about these tools' effects on quality of care for beneficiaries with chronic conditions. We surveyed physicians and nurse practitioners based in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Georgia to capture how they perceive these tools affect care and health outcomes for Medicaid-enrolled patients with chronic illnesses. We received 63 completed surveys, representing 19 (58%) of FQHCs in Georgia. Across multiple measures, 56.1-71.7% reported difficulties with prior authorization request denials, preferred medication prescribing, and specialist referrals "sometimes," "often," or "very often" when caring for patients with asthma. Greater difficulties with prior authorization request denials were associated with perceived poorer care quality (p=.03). Further research is needed to inform state policymaker decisions about potential restrictions on Medicaid managed care plans' use of cost containment tools with medically vulnerable beneficiaries.

Supply of Certified Applied Behavior Analysts in the United States: Implications for Service Delivery for Children With Autism.

OBJECTIVE: The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) underscores the importance of access to evidence-based interventions such as applied behavior analysis (ABA). Anecdotal evidence suggests limitations in the supply of ABA providers, but data remain scarce. The authors provide the first known examination of the supply of certified ABA providers in the United States. METHODS: Using 2018 data from the Behavior Analyst Certification Board, the authors compared the per capita supply of certified ABA providers in each state with a benchmark established using the Board's guidelines. Additionally, the authors examined state and regional variations in the supply of certified ABA providers. RESULTS: The per capita supply of certified ABA providers fell below the benchmark in 49 states and was higher in the Northeast than in other regions (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: New workforce policies are needed to increase the supply of certified ABA providers to meet the needs of youths with ASD.

Effect of Medicaid Disenrollment on Health Care Utilization Among Adults With Mental Health Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid is an important source of insurance coverage for those with mental health (MH) disorders in the United States. Although disruptions in Medicaid coverage are common, little is known about the dynamic relationship between Medicaid disenrollment and MH care utilization. OBJECTIVE: We estimated changes in all-cause and MH-related health care use post Medicaid disenrollment among a nationwide cohort of adults with MH disorders. SUBJECTS: We identified 8841 persons (197,630 person-months) ages 18-64 with MH disorders and Medicaid coverage from Panels 4 to 19 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental design and propensity weighting, we estimated logit models examining changes in service utilization per-person-per-month. We used a "post" indicator to estimate average differences in service use postdisenrollment (vs. those with continuous Medicaid coverage) and a count variable measuring total months since coverage loss to estimate changes over time. OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause outpatient visits, MH-related outpatient visits, and acute care visits. RESULTS: Becoming uninsured after Medicaid disenrollment was associated with average reductions of 52% [-14.75 percentage-points, 95% confidence interval (CI): -17.59, -11.91] in the likelihood of receiving any outpatient service, 35% (-2.23 percentage-points, 95% CI: -3.71, -0.75) in the likelihood of receiving any MH-related outpatient service, and 52% (-2.44 percentage-points; 95% CI: -3.35, -1.52) in the likelihood of receiving any acute service in a month. Health care use declined the most in the month immediately postdisenrollment, and declines continued over the next half-year (while uninsured). CONCLUSIONS: Insurance loss after disenrollment from Medicaid led to a persistent disruption in the receipt of health care services for beneficiaries with MH disorders.

Prior Authorization Policies and Preferred Drug Lists in Medicaid Plans: Stakeholder Perspectives on the Implications for Youth with ADHD.

This qualitative study describes how Medicaid policies create challenges for the delivery and receipt of mental health treatment for low-income youth in Georgia. We conducted focus groups with caregivers of Medicaid-enrolled children with ADHD and semi-structured interviews with providers and administrators at four safety net clinics that provided mental health care to these youth. Stakeholders reported that prior authorization policies for psychosocial services, restrictiveness of preferred drug lists, and changes in preferred drug lists in Medicaid plans created barriers to treatment continuity and quality for youth with ADHD and led to more administrative burden for safety-net clinics serving these youth.