Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 3): S252-S258, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33976074

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Congress has enacted 2 major pieces of legislation to improve access to care for Veterans within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). As a result, the VA has undergone a major transformation in the way that care is delivered to Veterans with an increased reliance on community-based provider networks. No studies have examined the relationship between VA and contracted community providers. This study examines VA facility directors' perspectives on their successes and challenges building relationships with community providers within the VA Community Care Network (CCN). OBJECTIVES: To understand who VA facilities partner with for community care, highlight areas of greatest need for partnerships in various regions, and identify challenges of working with community providers in the new CCN contract. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a national survey with VA facility directors to explore needs, challenges, and expectations with the CCN. RESULTS: The most common care referred to community providers included physical therapy, chiropractic, orthopedic, ophthalmology, and acupuncture. Open-ended responses focused on 3 topics: (1) Challenges in working with community providers, (2) Strategies to maintain strong relationships with community providers, and (3) Re-engagement with community providers who no longer provide care for Veterans. CONCLUSIONS: VA faces challenges engaging with community providers given problems with timely reimbursement of community providers, low (Medicare) reimbursement rates, and confusing VA rules related to prior authorizations and bundled services. It will be critical to identify strategies to successfully initiate and sustain relationships with community providers.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Política de Saúde , Parcerias Público-Privadas/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/legislação & jurisprudência , Redes Comunitárias/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Parcerias Público-Privadas/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/legislação & jurisprudência
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(Suppl 1): 18-23, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31098968

RESUMO

In response to widespread concerns regarding Veterans' access to VA care, Congress enacted the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which required VA to establish the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). Since the inception of VCP, more than two million Veterans have received care from community providers, representing approximately 25% of Veterans enrolled in VA care. However, expanded access to non-VA care has created challenges in care coordination between VA and community health systems. In March 2018, the VA Health Services Research & Development Service hosted a VA State of the Art conference (SOTA) focused on care coordination. The SOTA convened VA researchers, program directors, clinicians, and policy makers to identify knowledge gaps regarding care coordination within the VA and between VA and community systems of care. This article provides a summary and synthesis of relevant literature and provides recommendations generated from the SOTA about how to evaluate cross-system care coordination. Care coordination is typically evaluated using health outcomes including hospital readmissions and death; however, in cross-system evaluations of care coordination, measures such as access, cost, Veteran/patient and provider satisfaction (including with cross-system communication), comparable quality metrics, context (urban vs. rural), and patient complexity (medical and mental health conditions) need to be included to fully evaluate care coordination effectiveness. Future research should examine the role of multiple individuals coordinating VA and non-VA care, and how these coordinators work together to optimize coordination.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislação & jurisprudência , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Saúde dos Veteranos/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA