Spotlight on topical pimecrolimus in pediatric atopic dermatitis.

Topical pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel) [hereafter referred to as topical pimecrolimus] is a nonsteroidal alternative in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis. In vehicle-controlled, short-term, continuous-use trials in pediatric patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, topical pimecrolimus was effective in treating disease symptoms. Topical pimecrolimus was effective in preventing disease flares and reducing the need for topical corticosteroids in longer term, intermittent-use trials. In addition, topical pimecrolimus was associated with improvements in the health-related quality of life of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis and their parents. In vehicle-controlled trials, topical pimecrolimus was generally as well tolerated as vehicle. Topical pimecrolimus showed similar efficacy to topical tacrolimus 0.03% ointment in a short-term, continuous-use trial and the two agents had a generally similar tolerability profile. Although comparative data between topical pimecrolimus and topical corticosteroids are lacking in pediatric patients, and the long-term tolerability (beyond 1-2 years) of topical pimecrolimus is yet to be established, topical pimecrolimus is a useful agent in the management of pediatric patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis who do not achieve satisfactory treatment with other topical pharmacologic treatments, including topical corticosteroids.

Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of nausea and vomiting.

Aprepitant (Emend) is a neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) receptor antagonist that is able to alleviate the emetic effects of substance P. When combined with a standard regimen of a corticosteroid (dexamethasone) and a serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist (ondansetron), oral aprepitant (125 mg on day 1 then 80 mg once daily on days 2 and 3) was effective in the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with single or multiple cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). This aprepitant regimen was also effective in the prevention of CINV in patients treated with single or multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). A single oral dose of aprepitant 40 mg administered prior to patients undergoing abdominal surgery was also effective in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Aprepitant was generally well tolerated. Aprepitant is a recommended option for the treatment of PONV, and when combined with a corticosteroid and 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist is a recommended regimen for the treatment of CINV.

Bimatoprost/timolol: a review of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Topically administered bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution (bimatoprost/timolol: Ganfort) comprises the synthetic prostamide bimatoprost (structurally related to prostaglandin F2 alpha) and the beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist timolol. Bimatoprost/timolol (one drop administered in the affected eye[s] once daily in the morning or evening) is an effective and well tolerated fixed combination for lowering intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT), including individuals uncontrolled on monotherapy with a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist or prostaglandin analogue/prostamide.

Eszopiclone: a review of its use in the treatment of insomnia.

Eszopiclone (Lunesta), the S-enantiomer of racemic zopiclone, is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agent that is approved in the US as an oral, once-nightly therapy for insomnia in adults; eszopiclone is also currently under review by the European Medicines Agency. Eszopiclone is rapidly absorbed after oral administration without any next-day clinical residual effects being detected. Large, well designed trials of up to 6 months' duration have shown that eszopiclone significantly improves both sleep onset and sleep maintenance compared with placebo in adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia. Eszopiclone for 4-8 weeks also significantly improved sleep parameters compared with placebo in patients with insomnia coexisting with other conditions that also disturb sleep (co-morbid insomnia), and improved certain measures of the co-morbid conditions to a greater extent than the standard therapies alone. Short-term eszopiclone produced improvements in daytime functioning in patients with co-morbid insomnia. Six months' therapy in adults with primary insomnia improved daytime functioning and health-related quality of life. Eszopiclone was generally well tolerated. There was no evidence of tolerance during 12 months' treatment with this agent. On discontinuation of eszopiclone, there was no rebound insomnia or serious withdrawal effects. Well designed, comparative trials with other nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics are needed to determine its relative efficacy and tolerability. A cost-utility analysis suggested that eszopiclone is cost effective for the treatment of primary insomnia in the US. Therefore, eszopiclone is a useful therapeutic option in the management of adult and elderly patients with primary or co-morbid insomnia. Unlike most other hypnotics, eszopiclone is not limited to short-term use.

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta: a review of its use in the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) is a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, with a long half-life (approximately 130 hours). In patients with anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), both on and not on dialysis, who had not previously received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered intravenously or subcutaneously once every 2 weeks resulted in a smooth and steady rise in haemoglobin levels. The response rates were high (up to 97.5%) in these patients at the end of the correction period; response rates with the comparator ESAs (epoetin alfa or beta, or darbepoetin alfa) were up to 96.3%. Moreover, patients with CKD on dialysis who had previously been treated with an ESA maintained stable haemoglobin levels (within +/-1 g/dL of baseline and within a range of 10-13.5 g/dL) when directly converted to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered intravenously or subcutaneously once every 2 or 4 weeks. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta is generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being of mild to moderate severity, consistent with the co-morbidities known to occur in this patient group and those reported with other ESAs. In conclusion, in patients with anaemia associated with CKD, subcutaneous or intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta achieved a high haemoglobin response rate (ESA-naive patients) when administered once every 2 weeks and maintained stable haemoglobin levels (patients previously treated with ESAs) when administered once monthly.

Spotlight on eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Eptifibatide (Integrilin) is a highly specific, reversible, intravenously administered glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist that acts at the final common step of the platelet aggregation pathway. Data from large clinical trials indicate that intravenous eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy to standard care is effective in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the ESPRIT (Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy) trial in patients undergoing PCI with stenting, eptifibatide, compared with placebo, achieved significant reductions in death and ischemic complications and was better than a strategy of reserving treatment for the bailout situation. In the large PURSUIT (Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy) trial in patients with NSTE ACS, eptifibatide was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (MI) compared with placebo. Eptifibatide is well tolerated in these trials. Ongoing trials are currently investigating the efficacy and tolerability of regimens that include this agent in other indications, including ST-segment elevation MI.

Eptifibatide: a review of its use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Eptifibatide (Integrilin) is a highly specific, reversible, intravenously administered glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist that acts at the final common step of the platelet aggregation pathway. Data from large clinical trials indicate that intravenous eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy to standard care is effective in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the ESPRIT (Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy) trial in patients undergoing PCI with stenting, eptifibatide, compared with placebo, achieved significant reductions in death and ischaemic complications and was better than a strategy of reserving treatment for the bailout situation. In the large PURSUIT (Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy) trial in patients with NSTE ACS, eptifibatide was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (MI) compared with placebo. Eptifibatide is well tolerated in these trials. Ongoing trials are currently investigating the efficacy and tolerability of regimens that include this agent in other indications, including ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI).

Orlistat: a review of its use in the management of patients with obesity.

Orlistat is an inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases and, therefore, prevents the absorption of dietary fat. This agent reduces weight in obese adults and adolescents with or without comorbidities (including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, metabolic syndrome) who received up to 4 years of therapy in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet. In obese patients, orlistat in combination with a hypocaloric diet improved metabolic risk factors and reduced the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, this agent was cost effective in patients with obesity, particularly those with type 2 diabetes. Orlistat is generally well tolerated, with gastrointestinal adverse events being most commonly reported. Orlistat, in addition to lifestyle and dietary intervention, is thus an attractive option for the treatment of patients with obesity, especially those with associated comorbidities or at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Cabergoline : a review of its use in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Cabergoline is a synthetic ergoline dopamine agonist with a high affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and a long elimination half-life. This agent provides continuous dopaminergic stimulation with once-daily administration. Adjuvant oral cabergoline is usually well tolerated and effective in controlling symptoms in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease experiencing response fluctuations to long-term levodopa therapy. In patients with early Parkinson's disease, cabergoline (with or without levodopa) is well tolerated and effective in controlling disease symptoms, and may reduce the risk of developing drug-induced motor complications. Data from two pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that cabergoline may be a cost-effective treatment option versus levodopa in patients with early Parkinson's disease, and highlight the need for further evaluation of the drug in this indication.

Letrozole: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara), a nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor administered orally once daily, has shown efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced, hormone-sensitive breast cancer. In early-stage disease, extending adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (beyond the standard 5-year period of tamoxifen) improved disease-free survival; compared with placebo there was a 43% relative reduction in disease recurrences or new contralateral breast tumours at a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The results of 4 months' neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with untreated primary disease favour letrozole. In advanced breast cancer, letrozole was superior to tamoxifen as first-line treatment; time to disease progression was significantly longer (9.4 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) and objective response rate was significantly greater with letrozole, but median overall survival was similar between groups. For second-line therapy of advanced breast cancer that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole showed efficacy equivalent to that of anastrozole and similar to or better than that of megestrol acetate. Letrozole is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to tamoxifen; the most common treatment-related adverse events were hot flushes, nausea and hair thinning. In patients with tumours that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole was tolerated as least as well as, or better than, anastrozole or megestrol acetate. In the trial of extended adjuvant therapy, adverse events reported more frequently with letrozole than placebo were hot flushes, arthralgia, myalgia and arthritis. The long-term effects of letrozole on bone mineral density or lipid profile have not been determined and these parameters may require monitoring. In several pharmacoeconomic modelling studies from various public healthcare system perspectives, letrozole was considered a cost effective choice for first-line (vs tamoxifen) or second-line (vs megestrol acetate) treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, letrozole 2.5 mg/day is effective in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced breast cancer. The efficacy, cost effectiveness and favourable tolerability profile of letrozole are reflected in current treatment guidelines recommending the drug as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is superior to tamoxifen for first-line treatment and is at least as effective as standard second-line treatments in disease that has progressed on antiestrogen therapy. For early-stage disease, letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, and prolongs disease-free survival when administered after the standard 5-year period of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Spotlight on verteporfin in subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation.

UNLABELLED: Verteporfin (Visudyne) therapy (photodynamic therapy with intravenous liposomal verteporfin) is the first treatment to effectively prevent the loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), pathological myopia or presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS). In adult patients with classic subfoveal CNV or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, or subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS, verteporfin therapy slows or prevents loss of visual acuity. In well designed clinical trials, verteporfin therapy was superior to placebo in patients with subfoveal classic-containing CNV and occult with no classic CNV secondary to AMD at 12 and/or 24 months (Treatment of Age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy [TAP] Investigation and Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-AMD] trial) and in patients with pathological myopia at 12 months (Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-PM] trial). Limited data suggest that verteporfin therapy also prevents loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to POHS. Verteporfin therapy was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and transient. The most frequently reported verteporfin therapy-related adverse events (incidence >2%) were visual disturbance, injection-site reactions, photosensitivity reactions and infusion-related back pain. Approximately 5% of patients with occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD reported severe vision decrease within 7 days of treatment in clinical trials; 3 months later, several patients had recovered some of this loss. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, the first photosensitiser approved for the treatment of subfoveal CNV, is a well tolerated treatment that stabilises or slows visual acuity loss in adult patients with predominantly classic or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, and subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS. Thus, verteporfin therapy provides a valuable option for the management of these patients for whom treatment options are few, and should be considered as a first-line therapy in these difficult-to-manage conditions.

Verteporfin : a review of its use in the management of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation.

UNLABELLED: Verteporfin (Visudyne) therapy (photodynamic therapy with intravenous liposomal verteporfin) is the first treatment to effectively prevent the loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), pathological myopia or presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS). In adult patients with classic subfoveal CNV or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, or subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS, verteporfin therapy slows or prevents loss of visual acuity. In well designed clinical trials, verteporfin therapy was superior to placebo in patients with subfoveal classic-containing CNV and occult with no classic CNV secondary to AMD at 12 and/or 24 months (Treatment of Age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy [TAP] Investigation and Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-AMD] trial) and in patients with pathological myopia at 12 months (Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-PM] trial). Limited data suggest that verteporfin therapy also prevents loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to POHS. Verteporfin therapy was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and transient. The most frequently reported verteporfin therapy-related adverse events (incidence >2%) were visual disturbance, injection-site reactions, photosensitivity reactions and infusion-related back pain. Approximately 5% of patients with occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD reported severe vision decrease within 7 days of treatment in clinical trials; 3 months later, several patients had recovered some of this loss. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, the first photosensitiser approved for the treatment of subfoveal CNV, is a well tolerated treatment that stabilises or slows visual acuity loss in adult patients with predominantly classic or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, and subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS. Thus, verteporfin therapy provides a valuable option for the management of these patients for whom treatment options are few, and should be considered as a first-line therapy in these difficult-to-manage conditions.

Bilayered bioengineered skin substitute (Apligraf): a review of its use in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

UNLABELLED: The bilayered bioengineered skin substitute (BBSS) [Apligraf] is used for the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. It has an epidermal layer formed from human keratinocytes and a dermal layer composed of human fibroblasts in a bovine type I collagen matrix. BBSS does not contain any antigen-presenting cells such as Langerhans cells, dermal dendritic cells, endothelial cells or leucocytes. In clinical trials, there was no evidence of clinical rejection and immunological tests indicated no humoral or cellular response to the keratinocytes or fibroblasts of BBSS. Further clinical trials are required to identify the exact mechanism of action of BBSS in chronic wounds. BBSS plus compression therapy was well tolerated and was superior in efficacy to compression therapy alone in a multicentre, randomised trial in patients with venous leg ulcers. At 6 months' follow-up, complete wound healing occurred in 63 versus 49% of patients and the median time to wound closure was 61 versus 181 days. In a subgroup of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers (>1 year's duration), wound healing was achieved in significantly more patients (47 vs 19%) and the median time to wound healing was significantly shorter (181 days vs not attained). In a multicentre, randomised trial, BBSS was well tolerated and effective in patients with full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Ulcer healing occurred in significantly more patients (56 vs 38%) and the median time to wound healing was shorter (65 vs 90 days) with BBSS than with saline-moistened gauze at 12 weeks' follow-up. Patients in both groups also received standard diabetic foot care. The cost effectiveness of BBSS in patients with chronic ulcers has yet to be examined in well designed, prospective clinical trials. However, according to a modelled analysis incorporating data from a multicentre randomised trial, BBSS was cost effective in patients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. The average annual medical cost of managing patients with ulcers of >1 year's duration was estimated to be 20,041 US dollars per patient treated with BBSS plus compression therapy and 27,493 US dollars per patient treated with compression therapy alone (1996 costs). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials have shown that BBSS in conjunction with standard compression therapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with venous leg ulcers, especially patients with ulcers of >6 months' duration or that extended to the subcutaneous tissue. In addition, BBSS in conjunction with standard diabetic foot care was effective and well tolerated in patients with full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. BBSS represents a useful adjuvant to standard ulcer therapy in patients with venous leg ulcers or full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers that do not respond to conventional ulcer therapy.