Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 19(12): 1499-1507, 2017 Nov 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694436

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Community health workers (CHW) may be effective in the delivery of tobacco dependence treatment with underserved groups. This study evaluated two evidence-based CHW models of treatment. It was hypothesized that smokers assigned to a CHW face-to-face condition would have higher abstinence at 12-month posttreatment than smokers enrolled in CHW referral to a state-sponsored quitline condition. Intrapersonal and treatment-related factors associated with abstinence at 12 months were determined. METHODS: A group-randomized trial was conducted with residents of 12 Ohio Appalachian counties with counties (n = 6) randomized to either a CHW face-to-face (F2F) or CHW quitline (QL) condition. Both conditions included behavioral counseling and free nicotine replacement therapy for 8 weeks. Follow-up data were collected at 3-, 6-, and 12-month posttreatment. Biochemically validated abstinence at 12 months served as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seven participants were enrolled (n = 353 CHWF2F; n = 354 CHWQL). Baseline sample characteristics did not differ by condition. Using an intent-to-treat analysis (85.4% retention at 12 months), 13.3% of CHWF2F participants were abstinent at 12 months, compared to 10.7% of CHWQL members (OR = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.810, 2.014; p = .292). No differences in abstinence were noted at 3 or 6 months by condition. Age, marital status, and baseline levels of cigarette consumption, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy for quitting in positive settings were associated with abstinence, as was counseling dose during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This research adds to the body of science evaluating the effectiveness of CHW models of tobacco dependence treatment. Both approaches may offer promise in low-resource settings and underserved regions. IMPLICATIONS: This 12-county community-based group-randomized trial in Ohio Appalachia adds to the body of science evaluating the effectiveness of CHW models of tobacco dependence treatment. Both CHW approaches may offer promise in low-resource settings and underserved regions. These findings are useful to national, state, and local tobacco control agencies, as they expand delivery of preventive health care services postadoption of the Affordable Care Act in the United States.


Assuntos
Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Vida Independente/psicologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Tabagismo/psicologia , Tabagismo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Região dos Apalaches/epidemiologia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/tendências , Aconselhamento/métodos , Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Linhas Diretas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/tendências , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA