Free-breathing high resolution modified Dixon steady-state angiography with compressed sensing for the assessment of the thoracic vasculature in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) is a non-invasive imaging modality of choice in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). This study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of a respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated steady-state CMRA with modified Dixon (mDixon) fat suppression technique and compressed sensing in comparison to standard first-pass CMRA in pediatric patients with CHD at 3 T. METHODS: In this retrospective single center study, pediatric CHD patients who underwent CMR with first-pass CMRA followed by mDixon steady-state CMRA at 3 T were analyzed. Image quality using a Likert scale from 5 (excellent) to 1 (non-diagnostic) and quality of fat suppression were assessed in consensus by two readers. Blood-to-tissue contrast and quantitative measurements of the thoracic vasculature were assessed separately by two readers. CMRA images were reevaluated by two readers for additional findings, which could be identified only on either one of the CMRA types. Paired Student t test, Wilcoxon test, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 32 patients with CHD (3.3 ± 1.7 years, 13 female) were included. Overall image quality of steady-state mDixon CMRA was higher compared to first-pass CMRA (4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.5; P < 0.001). Blood-to-tissue contrast ratio of steady-state mDixon CMRA was comparable to first-pass CMRA (7.85 ± 4.75 vs. 6.35 ± 2.23; P = 0.133). Fat suppression of steady-state mDixon CMRA was perfect in 30/32 (94%) cases. Vessel diameters were greater in first-pass CMRA compared to steady-state mDixon CMRA with the greatest differences at the level of pulmonary arteries and veins (e.g., right pulmonary artery for reader 1: 10.4 ± 2.4 vs. 9.9 ± 2.3 mm, P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was higher for steady-state mDixon CMRA for all measurements compared to first-pass CMRA (ICCs > 0.92). In 9/32 (28%) patients, 10 additional findings were identified on mDixon steady-state CMRA (e.g., partial anomalous venous return, abnormalities of coronary arteries, subclavian artery stenosis), which were not depicted using first-pass CMRA. CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state mDixon CMRA offers a robust fat suppression, a high image quality, and diagnostic utility for the assessment of the thoracic vasculature in pediatric CHD patients.

Free-breathing non-contrast flow-independent cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using cardiac gated, magnetization-prepared 3D Dixon method: assessment of thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate a non-contrast respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) based on magnetization-prepared Dixon method (relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering, REACT) for the assessment of the thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. METHODS: 70 patients with CHD (mean 28 years, range: 10-65 years) were retrospectively identified in this single-center study. REACT-CMRA was applied with respiratory- and cardiac-gating. Image quality (IQ) of REACT-CMRA was compared to standard non-gated multi-phase first-pass-CMRA and respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated steady-state-CMRA. IQ of different vessels of interest (ascending aorta, left pulmonary artery, left superior pulmonary vein, right coronary ostium, coronary sinus) was independently assessed by two readers on a five-point Likert scale. Measurements of vessel diameters were performed in predefined anatomic landmarks (ascending aorta, left pulmonary artery, left superior pulmonary vein). Both readers assessed artifacts and vascular abnormalities. Friedman test, chi-squared test, and Bland-Altman method were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall IQ score of REACT-CMRA was higher compared to first-pass-CMRA (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) and did not differ from steady-state-CMRA (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6, P = 0.99). Non-diagnostic IQ of the defined vessels of interest was observed less frequently on REACT-CMRA (1.7 %) compared to steady-state- (4.3 %, P = 0.046) or first-pass-CMRA (20.9 %, P < 0.001). Close agreements in vessel diameter measurements were observed between REACT-CMRA and steady-state-CMRA (e.g. ascending aorta, bias: 0.38 ± 1.0 mm, 95 % limits of agreement (LOA): - 1.62-2.38 mm). REACT-CMRA showed high intra- (bias: 0.04 ± 1.0 mm, 95 % LOA: - 1.9-2.0 mm) and interobserver (bias: 0.20 ± 1.1 mm, 95 % LOA: - 2.0-2.4 mm) agreements regarding vessel diameter measurements. Fat-water separation artifacts were observed in 11/70 (16 %) patients on REACT-CMRA but did not limit diagnostic utility. Six vascular abnormalities were detected on REACT-CMRA that were not seen on standard contrast-enhanced CMRA. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast-enhanced cardiac-gated REACT-CMRA offers a high diagnostic quality for assessment of the thoracic vasculature in CHD patients.

Influence of hydration status on cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T1 and T2 relaxation time assessment: an intraindividual study in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial native T1 and T2 relaxation time mapping are sensitive to pathological increase of myocardial water content (e.g. myocardial edema). However, the influence of physiological hydration changes as a possible confounder of relaxation time assessment has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, whether changes in myocardial water content due to dehydration and hydration might alter myocardial relaxation times in healthy subjects. METHODS: A total of 36 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans were performed in 12 healthy subjects (5 men, 25.8 ± 3.2 years). Subjects underwent three successive CMR scans: (1) baseline scan, (2) dehydration scan after 12 h of fasting (no food or water), (3) hydration scan after hydration. CMR scans were performed for the assessment of myocardial native T1 and T2 relaxation times and cardiac function. For multiple comparisons, repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test was used. RESULTS: There was no change in systolic blood pressure or left ventricular ejection fraction between CMR scans (P > 0.05, respectively). T1 relaxation times were significantly reduced with dehydration (987 ± 27 ms [baseline] vs. 968 ± 29 ms [dehydration] vs. 986 ± 28 ms [hydration]; P = 0.006). Similar results were observed for T2 relaxation times (52.9 ± 1.8 ms [baseline] vs. 51.5 ± 2.0 ms [dehydration] vs. 52.2 ± 1.9 ms [hydration]; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Dehydration may lead to significant alterations in relaxation times and thereby may influence precise, repeatable and comparable assessment of native T1 and T2 relaxation times. Hydration status should be recognized as new potential confounder of native T1 and T2 relaxation time assessment in clinical routine.

The effects of flip angle optimization on the precision and reproducibility of feature tracking derived strain assessment in contrast enhanced bSSFP cine images.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a flip angle adaptation, which is known to improve SNR and CNR in post contrast SSFP imaging, improves the precision and reproducibility of Feature Tracking (FT) derived strain assessments in post contrast bSSFP imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: At 1.5T balanced SSFP midventricular short axis cine images were acquired with various flip angles (FA) before (FA = 50°) and 5 min after (FAs = 50°, 80°, 90°, 100°) injection of double dose Gadobutrol. FT derived systolic circumferential strain was then calculated for all pre- and post-contrast images, the intra- and inter-observer variability of strain measurements was assessed. FT derived midventricular peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) derived from unadapted (FA: 50°) contrast enhanced bSSFP images was significantly lower than strain derived from unenhanced bSSFP images (-16.45 ±â€¯5.1% vs -20.57 ±â€¯6.2%; p < 0.001) and showed low agreement (mean difference of -4.13 ±â€¯2.4, 95% CI:-5.3 to -3) in all 20 subjects. After adaption of the flip angle (FA: 100°), agreement between strain derived from unenhanced and adapted contrast enhanced bSSFP images (-20.57 ±â€¯6%) was strong (0.01 ±â€¯0.9, CI:-0.43 to 0.41). In comparison to intra- and interobserver variability of strain derived from unenhanced images (intra 2.9%; inter: 3.9%), strain measurements derived from adapted contrast enhanced images (FA: 100°) showed a slightly lower variability (intra: 2.5%; inter: 2.3%). CONCLUSION: If flip angle adaptation is performed, FT based strain analysis may be performed on contrast enhanced bSSFP cine images without loss of precision and accuracy.

Incidental Cardiac Findings in Non-Electrocardiogram-gated Thoracic Computed Tomography of Intensive Care Unit Patients: Assessment of Prevalence and Underreporting.

PURPOSE: Cardiac findings frequently remain unreported on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT). Although the clinical relevance of such findings may be limited in a general patient population, they may have significant impact in intensive care patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, underreporting, and clinical relevance of incidental cardiac findings in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-ECG-gated chest CT examinations of ICU patients were retrospectively analyzed for incidental cardiac findings. The findings were classified into 3 categories (A to C): category A findings, which carry potential for risk to life; category B findings, which have a potential for significant morbidity; category C findings, which have a possible effect on prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients who underwent non-ECG-gated thoracic CT examinations were included. Of the 500 patients, 403 presented with 1443 cardiac findings. Of all cardiac findings, 37% were described in the initial written report. Sixty category A findings were detected, of which 48% were not mentioned in the report. Six hundred forty category B findings were detected, of which 77% were not described in the report. The remaining 743 findings were classified as category C, 55% of which were not reported in the report. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence as well as the rate of underreporting of incidental cardiac findings in non-ECG-gated chest CT of ICU patients is very high. The results of this study underscore the importance of dedicated training for assessment of cardiac structures and conditions, which may be detected on non-ECG-gated chest CT.

Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking with CSPAMM HARP for the assessment of global and regional layer specific strain.

PURPOSE: Layer specific strain assessment is increasingly being employed clinically. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) Feature Tracking (FT) is considered to be an adequate alternative for strain assessment. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of FT derived layer specific strain assessment. METHODS: CSPAMM and SSFP-Cine sequences were acquired in 38 individuals (19 patients with HFpEF, 19 controls) in identical midventricular short-axis locations. Global endocardial-, midmyocardial-, epicardial- peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) and regional epicardial PSCS were calculated and intra- as well inter-observer variability were assessed. RESULTS: FT derived global epicardial and endocardial PSCS (7.9±2.3%; -19.6±4.9%) were significantly lower than tagging derived global epicardial and endocardial PSCS (-13.2±2.8%; -32.3±5.9%) (each p<0.001), while FT derived endocardial PSCS and tagging derived midmyocardial PSCS showed a strong correlation (r=0.71) and no significant differences. Global intra- and inter-observer variability of FT derived endocardial PSCS circumferential measures were acceptable (coefficient of variation 6.5% and 5.7%) while reproducibility of epicardial PSCS (coefficient of variation 16.8% and 18.1%) was poor. CONCLUSION: The FT algorithm allows for reliable assessment of midmyocardial strain, while underestimating epicardial and endocardial strain and delivering less reproducible results than the gold standard of tagging.

Quantitative assessment of systolic and diastolic function in patients with LGE negative systemic amyloidosis using CMR.

OBJECTIVES: In clinical routine myocardial affection in amyloidosis is assessed by qualitative late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Recent studies suggest that early cardiac involvement in amyloidosis may be overlooked by qualitative LGE assessment. The aim of this study was to assess possible early cardiac involvement in LGE negative AL patients by means of systolic and diastolic strain assessment and quantitative enhancement. METHODS: 51 individuals (17 Patients with LGE positive light-chain amyloidosis (AL) (Group A), 17 Patients with LGE negative systemic AL (Group B), and 17 healthy controls (Group C)) were investigated. SSFP-Cine sequences were acquired in short axis slices as well as horizontal long axis views. Standard CMR parameters as well as Feature Tracking (FT) derived systolic and diastolic circumferential and longitudinal strain parameters were calculated. Additionally, contrast enhanced MRI images were analyzed to quantitatively determine the extent of enhancement. RESULTS: AL patients with and without LGE both had significantly lower early diastolic strain rate (EDSR) values and peak systolic longitudinal strain (PSLS) values than healthy controls (EDSR: Group A 63.1±17.6; Group B: 74.46±11.8; Group C: 86.82±12.7; F(2.48)=10.7 p<0.001); (PSLS: Group A: -13.44±1.9%; Group B: -20.31±1.2%; Group C: -23.11±1.4%; F(2.48)=167.6; p<0.001). Analysis of quantitative LGE enhancement revealed increased enhancement in qualitative LGE negative AL patients compared to healthy controls (Group A: 19.6±8.9%; Group B: 8.2±3.9%; Group C: 2.4±1.3% F(2.48)=52.2; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CMR strain analysis detects early systolic and diastolic strain impairment in AL patients lacking qualitative LGE enhancement.

Assessment of cardiac dyssynchrony by cardiac MR: A comparison of velocity encoding and feature tracking analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether cardiac magnetic resonance (cardiac MR)-based feature tracking (FT) may be used for robust and rapid quantification of dyssynchrony by measurement of the septal to lateral delay (SLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 18) and patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (n = 17) were investigated. Velocity encoding cardiac MR (VENC) and steady-state free precession (SSFP)-cine sequences were acquired in identical horizontal long axis (HLA) positions using a 1.5T MR scanner. Using FT and VENC cardiac MR software, myocardial velocity curves were calculated for the basal segment of the septal and lateral wall. Based on the quantity of dyssynchrony, the patients were classified into three subgroups (minimal, intermediate, extensive). SLD and patient classification were compared and intra- as well as interobserver variability assessed. RESULTS: VENC and FT SLD measurements showed strong correlation (r = 0.94) and good agreement (mean 1.33 msec; limits of agreement [LoA] -2.96 to 5.63). Dyssynchrony subclassification based on FT was identical to VENC in 83% of the cases. While FT correctly classified all healthy subjects, three patients with mechanical dyssynchrony were misclassified. Compared to VENC, FT showed higher intra- and interobserver variability. VENC: intraobserver: mean 2.5 msec, LoA -17.5 to 22.5; interobserver: mean 1.5 msec, LoA -17.2 to 21.9. FT: intraobserver: mean 2.1 msec, LoA 27.6 to 31.8; interobserver: mean 2.4 msec LoA -31.4 to 34.5. CONCLUSION: Cardiac MR-based FT analysis may be used for rapid appraisal of left ventricle cardiac dyssynchrony from SSFP images. However, FT results are less accurate and reproducible compared to VENC-based assessment of SLD.