Subjective assessment of complexity and prognosis after pulmonary vein isolation as significant predictor for procedural success.

PURPOSE: Subjective estimation of recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation is an important tool in clinical use. The aim of this study is to evaluate (1) if the subjective complexity of an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure is correlated with rhythm stability and (2) if the subjective prognosis of the operator has a predictive value. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients admitted for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Two scores were given immediately after the procedure by the operator: the complexity and the prognosis scores. With routine follow-ups, we tried to evaluate the correlation between the subjective scores and measured outcome. RESULTS: The study population included 611 patients (63 ± 10 years, 37% females, 61% persistent AF). During follow-up (FU) (median 24, IQR 7-36 months), recurrences occurred in 44% patients. Both scores (prognosis and complexity) correlated significantly with age, persistent AF, LA diameter, procedural characteristics, and recurrences. On multivariable analysis, complexity (OR 1.304, 95%CI 1.016-1.675, p = 0.037) and prognosis (OR 1.443, 95%CI 1.080-1.982, p = 0.013) scores remained significant predictors for arrhythmia recurrences. On ROC analysis, both scores showed significant predictive value for rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation (AUC 0.599 and 0.613, both p < 0.001 for complexity and prognosis scores, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Complexity and prognosis scores are significant predictors for arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablations and even independent when competing with simple risk factors.

[Implantable loop recorder in atrial fibrillation and after catheter ablation]. / Implantierbare Loop-Rekorder bei Vorhofflimmern und nach Katheterablation.

BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are an established diagnostic method for detection of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to provide an overview of available data and indications of ILR in atrial fibrillation, especially after catheter ablation, in order to illustrate practice-oriented recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a selective PubMed literature search. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: ILR can record asymptomatic/rare atrial fibrillation episodes and prevent thromboembolic events by allowing timely initiation of oral anticoagulation. They can be used to assess therapeutic success after percutaneous or surgical ablation, if despite increased thromboembolic risk, no oral anticoagulation is desired. ILR equipped with remote monitoring function and special P wave detection algorithms may improve diagnostic confidence.

Assessment of coronary morphology and flow in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome and ST-segment elevation.

Patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome often have cardiac disturbances as a manifestation of autonomic dysfunction. Such abnormalities consist of arrhythmias and disturbances of heart rate and blood pressure. We report a case of a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome who developed ST-segment elevation in the inferolateral leads, suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome. Cardiac catheterization revealed angiographically normal coronary arteries. Intracoronary ultrasound was also normal. Intracoronary Doppler flow measurements revealed an elevated baseline coronary flow velocity of up to 41 cm/s and decreased coronary flow reserve, particularly in the left circumflex artery. Myopericarditis as cause of the electrocardiographic changes could be ruled out by echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsy. We postulate that the intracoronary Doppler findings are caused by autonomic dysfunction with decrease of coronary resistance and redistribution of the transmural myocardial blood flow.

Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is based on pressure measurements. We have now sought to establish a Doppler-based concept of relative flow velocity reserve (RFVR) for the functional assessment of stenosis severity in epicardial coronary arteries. A clear threshold value to discriminate the functional severity of a coronary stenosis does not exist for coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) based on intracoronary Doppler measurements. In contrast, the concept of FFR, which is based on intracoronary pressure measurements, has been extensively validated. An FFR value below 0.75 reliably indicates a significant stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: RFVR is calculated as the ratio between distal CVR in the stenosed target vessel and distal CVR in a nonstenotic reference vessel. In 21 patients, RFVR was determined in 24 target vessels by use of intracoronary adenosine and correlated to the FFR, determined as the ratio of mean poststenotic to aortic pressures, in the target vessel. Stenosis severity was classified according to quantitative coronary angiography analysis. Reference diameter was 3.0+/-0.4 mm (mean+/-SD), and area stenosis was 74+/-15% (range, 40% to 95%). CVRs in the target and reference vessels were 2.1+/-0.5 and 2.6+/-0.7, respectively. FFR ranged from 0.49 to 0.99 (mean, 0.81+/-0.15) and RFVR from 0.53 to 1.0 (mean, 0.82+/-0.13). Poststenotic CVR did not correlate with either percent area stenosis (r=0.27, P=NS) or FFR (r=0.33, P=NS). In contrast, FFR as well as RFVR showed a curvilinear relation to percent area stenosis (r=0.89, P<0.0001 and r=0.79, P<0.0001, respectively). There was a close linear correlation between FFR and RFVR (r=0.91, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RFVR correlates closely to FFR and to percent area stenosis, whereas the correlation of CVR with FFR and percent area stenosis is rather poor. RFVR is a promising new concept for assessment of coronary stenosis severity and clinical decision making based on Doppler measurements.