Reliability of digital repeated-scan superimposition and single-scan techniques for wear volume loss assessment on flat surfaces.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the reliability of digital techniques for wear volume assessment using three-dimensional (3D) scan datasets is scarce. This study evaluated the reliability of a repeated-scan superimposition technique and two single-scan techniques in assessing wear volume loss on flat surfaces of 3D-printed resin specimens. METHODS: Cuboid-shaped (15×10×10 mm) resin specimens were 3D-printed (n = 14) and scanned before and after 200,000 cycles of masticatory simulation. For the repeated-scan superimposition technique, digital 3D models of specimens before and after masticatory simulation were superimposed, and the volume loss was determined. The first single-scan technique utilized a computer-aided design freeware program, while the second one employed a 3D-metrology software program. In the freeware program, the worn area of 3D objects was edited directly to obtain a flat surface. In the 3D-metrology software program, the worn area was deleted first and then filled to the flat surface. The volume differences before and after editing were calculated in each software program. Agreement between the three measurement techniques was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the wear volume loss assessed by the three techniques (α = 0.05). RESULTS: High inter-technique reliability was observed between the three assessment techniques (ICC = 0.998, p < .001). On pair-wise comparisons of two of the three techniques, all pairs showed high consistency (ICC ≥ 0.999, p < .001). No significant difference was found in the wear volume loss assessed using the three techniques (p = .996). CONCLUSIONS: Digital repeated-scan superimposition and two single-scan techniques demonstrated high reliability in assessing wear volume loss on flat surfaces. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The repeated-scan superimposition technique can be effectively utilized to assess wear volume loss of anatomically shaped specimens and flat surfaces. This study indicates that the single-scan techniques may serve as a suitable alternative to the repeated-scan superimposition technique when evaluating wear volume loss of flat surfaces.

Time-and cost-effective 3-dimensional-printing workflow to rehabilitate worn dentitions: A clinical report.

Current restorative methods of restoring worn or eroded dentition present drawbacks that may deter dentists or patients from pursuing complete mouth rehabilitation. A novel additive manufacturing approach using 3D-printed definitive composite resin restorations is described as a less technique-sensitive and more cost-effective alternative. These restorations are straightforward to repair, modify, or replace.

Efficiency of 3D-printed composite resin restorations compared with subtractive materials: Evaluation of fatigue behavior, cost, and time of production.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Three-dimensionally (3D)-printed composite resins have been marketed as materials for definitive restorations. However, limited information is available regarding the stability of the adhesive interface and the efficiency of 3D-printed composite resins. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the integrity of the marginal adhesive interface before and after thermal and mechanical fatigue of an initial formulation of a 3D-printed composite resin and to evaluate the efficiency of this manufacturing method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Freshly extracted molars were prepared for onlays and adhesively restored with either 3D-printed composite resin (VarseoSmile Crown Plus) (Group 3D), milled composite resin (Tetric CAD) (Group MCOMP), milled PMMA (Telio CAD) (Group PMMA), and milled lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) (Group EM). Marginal analysis was performed under a scanning electron microscope before and after fatigue by thermomechanical cyclic loading, and initial and terminal percentages of continuous margin (%CM) were compared. The time required for the production of each type of restoration was recorded, and the production costs were also compared. RESULTS: Before aging, 3D, MCOMP, and EM presented comparable values of %CM (69.8%, 75.9%, and 63.1%, respectively) that were statistically significantly higher (P<.05) than those of PMMA (45.1%). After aging, 3D and EM had comparable results (44.7% and 43.7%, respectively), which were lower than those of the MCOMP group (68.5%) but higher than those of the PMMA group (20.5%). Regarding time efficiency, 3D printing took less time than MCOMP or PMMA if more than 8 restorations were fabricated. For the production costs, 3D printing was 5.5, 8.7, and 10.2 times less expensive than PMMA, MCOMP, and EM, respectively. The initial equipment cost was also lower for the additive manufacturing method. However, 3D printing did not always considerably reduce waste. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of marginal adaptation, the evaluated initial formulation of a 3D-printed composite resin behaved similarly to other well-established definitive restoration materials and better than milled PMMA, both before and after fatigue. Three-dimensionally printed resins present advantages in terms of equipment and consumable costs, even for a single restoration, but also for production time when more than 8 restorations were fabricated.

Evaluation of the Validity of Digital Optical Microscopy in the Assessment of Marginal Adaptation of Dental Adhesive Interfaces.

Analysis of marginal adaptation of dental adhesive interfaces using scanning electron microscopy has proven to be a powerful nondestructive method to evaluate the quality of adhesion. This methodology is, however, time-consuming and needs expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility and efficiency of using a digital optical microscope (DOM) to perform marginal analysis and to compare it with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Fifteen defect-free molars were selected for this study. Class V cavities were prepared and restored with resin composite, and epoxy replicas were obtained from silicone impressions of the restored teeth. Custom-made image analysis software was then used to measure the percentage of the noncontinuous margins (NCM) of each sample. To compare the DOM to the gold standard, SEM, each sample was analyzed 10 times using the DOM and three times using the SEM, by the same experienced operator. The repeatability coefficient and concordance were evaluated, and a Bland and Altman analysis was used for comparison of the two methods of measurements. To validate the DOM analysis method, an ANOVA approach (Gage R R) was used. Repeatability and reproducibility, which are two components of precision to validate the DOM analysis system, were calculated. For this, the same restorations were analyzed by two additional operators three times with the DOM. The duration of each step of the analysis using both methods was also recorded as a secondary outcome. Regarding the repeatability of each method, the Friedman test showed no statistically significant difference within the repetitions of measurements by SEM and DOM (p = 0.523 and p = 0.123, respectively). Moreover, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 0.86 and concluded no statistically significant difference between the two methods, DOM and SEM. ANOVA evaluated DOM measurement system variation including the variances of repeatability and reproducibility that represented, respectively, 0.3% and 4% of the variance components. Reproducibility or inter-operator variability represented the principal source of variability with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.024). The time required for analysis with SEM was almost double that of DOM. The use of digital optical microscopy appears to be a valid alternative to the SEM for the analysis of marginal adaptation of dental adhesive interfaces. Further studies to evaluate the effect of training of operators in digital optical microscopy could reveal higher accuracy for this method and inter-operator agreement when experience is gained.

3D Digital Smile Design With a Mobile Phone and Intraoral Optical Scanner.

Extraoral facial scanning using a mobile phone has emerged as a viable, cost-effective option for certain applications not requiring high precision, such as patient education and 3-dimensional (3D) digital smile design. This technological development is particularly promising for general practitioners (GPs) who may not be able to invest in expensive,complex digital impressioning devices. This article describes and illustrates a relatively simple and accessible workflow that avails digital 3D facial scanning benefits to GPs.