Critical care and vitamin D status assessment: what about immunoassays and calculated free 25OH-D?

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of 25OH-D measurement during critical care (CC) may be problematic due to variations of binding protein concentrations (albumin, ALB, and vitamin D binding protein, VDBP). Determination of free 25OH-D concentration may thus be relevant in CC patients. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate effects of an acute hemodilution on vitamin D (VD) status. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained before (T1) and after a crystalloid load (T2) administered at anesthesia induction for minor surgery. 25OH-D was measured with LC-MS/MS and with 3 immunoassays (IA): DiaSorin Liaison, IDS iSYS and bioMérieux Vidas. VDBP was measured with the R&D Elisa and ALB on Cobas. Free 25OH-D was calculated using published formula. Accuracy of each 25OH-D IA was calculated as the percentage of IA values within 20% of their respective LC-MS/MS values. Performances of the three AI were compared with LC-MC/MS using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Twenty adults were included. Compared to T1 values, VDBP, ALB and LC-MS/MS values decreased in parallel by a mean of 23% at T2. IA values decreased less significantly (12, 14 and 15% for Liaison, iSYS and Vidas, respectively). IA-based calculated free 25OH-D significantly increased after dilution, while LC-MS/MS-based free values remained stable. At T1 and T2, bias were demonstrable for all IA. After hemodilution, bias would lead to overestimation for the three IA. Accuracy of IA decreased after dilution. CONCLUSIONS: Due to matrix effects, compared to LC-MS/MS, IA results were impacted by hemodilution. In CC patients, LC-MS/MS seems to be the best option to measure 25OH-D. Specific LC-MS/MS method should be developed to measure free 25OH-D.

Citrate vs. heparin for anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin with that of regional citrate anticoagulation in intensive care patients treated by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial in a 32-bed medical and surgical ICU in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: ICU patients with acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, without cirrhosis, severe coagulopathy, or known sensitivity to heparin. INTERVENTIONS: Before the first CVVH run patients were randomized to receive anticoagulation with heparin or trisodium citrate. Patients eligible for another CVVH run received the other study medication in a cross-over fashion until the fourth circuit. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine circuits (hemofilters) were analyzed: 23 with heparin and 26 with citrate. The median lifetime of hemofilters was 70 h (interquartile range 44-140) with citrate anticoagulation and 40 h (17-48) with heparin (p=0.0007). One major bleeding occurred during heparin anticoagulation and one metabolic alkalosis (pH=7.60) was noted with citrate after a protocol violation. Transfusion rates (units of red cells per day of CVVH) were, respectively, 0.2 (0.0-0.4) with citrate and 1.0 (0.0-2.0) with heparin (p=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation seems superior to heparin for the filter lifetime and transfusion requirements in ICU patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy.