Potential strategy for assessing QT/QTc interval for drugs that produce rapid changes in heart rate: Electrocardiographic assessment of the effects of intravenous remimazolam on cardiac repolarization.

AIMS: Remimazolam is a new, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine developed for intravenous (IV) use during procedural sedation and in general anaesthesia. Two trials were conducted to characterize its effects on cardiac repolarization. METHODS: A thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study assessed electrocardiography effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of remimazolam and midazolam. To investigate whether RR-QT hysteresis effects due to rapid heart rate changes might have confounded the QTc assessments in the TQT trial, a second trial used continuous IV remimazolam infusion to achieve stable heart rates during periods of stable remimazolam plasma concentration. RESULTS: During the TQT, both compounds produced a 10-20-beats/min increase in heart rate within 30 seconds, persisting for 5-10 minutes. Within 30 seconds, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for the placebo-corrected change from baseline for QTcI (ΔΔQTcI) exceeded 10 ms for both doses of remimazolam (ΔΔQTcI 7.2 [3.2, 11.2] ms for the 10 mg dose and 10.4 [6.5, 14.3] ms for the 20 mg dose) as well as for the 7.5-mg dose of midazolam (8.2 [4.4, 12.1] ms). At 2 minutes after IV bolus, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcI exceeded 10 ms only for the remimazolam 20-mg dose (6.3 [2.3, 10.2] ms). During the second study, during periods of stable heart rate, remimazolam had no clinically significant effect on QTc (peak ΔΔQTcI 3.4 [-1.1, 7.6] ms). CONCLUSION: Remimazolam does not prolong cardiac repolarization (QTc). The methods reported here may allow assessment of the QTc effects of other drugs given by IV bolus.

Cardiac risk assessment based on early Phase I data and PK-QTc analysis is concordant with the outcome of thorough QTc trials: an assessment based on eleven drug candidates.

Cardiac safety assessment is a key regulatory requirement for almost all new drugs. Until recently, one evaluation aspect was via a specifically designated, expensive, and resource intensive thorough QTc study, and a by-time-point analysis using an intersection-union test (IUT). ICH E14 Q&A (R3) (http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E14/E14_Q_As_R3__Step4.pdf) allows for analysis of the PK-QTc relationship using early Phase I data to assess QTc liability. In this paper, we compared the cardiac risk assessment based on the early Phase I analysis with that from a thorough QTc study across eleven drug candidate programs, and demonstrate that the conclusions are largely the same. The early Phase I analysis is based upon a linear mixed effect model with known covariance structure (Dosne et al. in Stat Med 36(24):3844-3857, 2017). The treatment effect was evaluated at the supratherapeutic Cmax as observed in the thorough QTc study using a non-parametric bootstrap analysis to generate 90% confidence intervals for the treatment effect, and implementation of the standardized methodology in R and SAS software yielded consistent results. The risk assessment based on the concentration-response analysis on the early Phase I data was concordant with that based on the standard analysis of the thorough QTc study for nine out of the eleven drug candidates. This retrospective analysis is consistent with and supportive of the conclusion of a previous prospective analysis by Darpo et al. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 97(4):326-335, 2015) to evaluate whether C-QTc analysis can detect QTc effects in a small study with healthy subjects.

Challenges in implementing and obtaining acceptance for J-Tpeak assessment as the clinical component of CiPA.

INTRODUCTION: This paper is based on a presentation held at the Annual Safety Pharmacology Society meeting in September 2017, at which challenges for the clinical component of CiPA were presented. FDA has published an automated algorithm for measurement of the J-Tpeak interval on a median beat from a vector magnitude lead derived from a 12-lead ECG. CiPA proposes that J-Tpeak prolongation < 10 ms can be used for drugs with a QTc effect < 20 ms to differentiate between safe and unsafe delayed repolarization and to reduce the level of ECG monitoring in late stage clinical trials. METHODS: We applied FDA's algorithm, complemented with iCOMPAS, to moxifloxacin and dolasetron data from the IQ-CSRC study with 9 subjects on active and 6 on placebo. The effect on QTcF and corrected J-Tpeak (J-Tpeak_c) was analyzed using concentration-effect modeling. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between QTcF and J-Tpeak_c prolongation after oral dosing of 400 mg moxifloxacin with placebo-adjusted, change-from-baseline (ΔΔ) J-Tpeak_c of ~12 ms at concentrations that caused ΔΔQTcF of ~20 ms. On dolasetron, J-Tpeak_c was highly variable, no prolongation was seen and an effect on ΔΔJ-Tpeak_c > 10 ms could be excluded across the observed plasma concentration range. DISCUSSION: In this limited analysis performed on the IQ-CSRC study waveforms using FDA's automated algorithm, J-Tpeak prolongation was observed on moxifloxacin, but not on dolasetron, despite clinical observations of proarrhythmias with both drugs. Challenges for the implementation of the J-Tpeak interval as a replacement or complement to the QTc interval, include to demonstrate that the proposed clinical algorithm using a J-Tpeak threshold of 10 ms, can be used to categorize drugs with a QT effect up to ~20 ms as having low pro-arrhythmic risk.

Clinical ECG Assessment.

With the adoption of the ICH E14 guidance, the thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study has become the focus of clinical assessment of an NCE's effects on ECG parameters. The TQT study is used as a guide to the liability of a drug to cause proarrhythmias on the basis of delayed cardiac repolarization. Around 300 TQT studies have been performed since 2005 and through interactions between sponsors and regulators, especially FDA's Interdisciplinary Review Team (IRT) for QT studies. These studies can today be performed more effectively and with great confidence in the generated data. This chapter will discuss technical features and the design and analysis of TQT studies, how assay sensitivity is demonstrated, and examples from recently conducted studies. ECG assessment for drugs that cannot be safely given to healthy volunteers is also addressed, and examples from studies in cancer patients and in healthy volunteers with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are discussed. The TQT study is resource intensive and designed to solely evaluate whether an NCE prolongs the QTc interval. If data with similar confidence can be generated from other studies that are routinely performed as part of the clinical development, this would represent a more optimal use of human resources. Methods and approaches to increase the confidence in ECG data derived from "early QT assessment" in single-ascending/multiple-ascending dose studies are therefore discussed, and a path toward replacing the TQT study using these approaches will be outlined.

Cardiac Safety Research Consortium: can the thorough QT/QTc study be replaced by early QT assessment in routine clinical pharmacology studies? Scientific update and a research proposal for a path forward.

The International Conference on Harmonization E14 guidance for the clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation requires almost all new drugs to undergo a dedicated clinical study, primarily in healthy volunteers, the so-called TQT study. Since 2005, when the E14 guidance was implemented in United States and Europe, close to 400 TQT studies have been conducted. In February 2012, the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium held a think tank meeting at Food and Drug Administration's White Oak campus to discuss whether "QT assessment" can be performed as part of routine phase 1 studies. Based on these discussions, a group of experts convened to discuss how to improve the confidence in QT data from early clinical studies, for example, the First-Time-in-Human trial, through collection of serial electrocardiograms and pharmacokinetic samples and the use of exposure response analysis. Recommendations are given on how to design such "early electrocardiogram assessment," and the limitation of not having a pharmacologic-positive control in these studies is discussed. A research path is identified toward collecting evidence to replace or provide an alternative to the dedicated TQT study.

The IQ-CSRC prospective clinical Phase 1 study: "Can early QT assessment using exposure response analysis replace the thorough QT study?".

A collaboration between the Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development and the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium has been formed to design a clinical study in healthy subjects demonstrating that the thorough QT (TQT) study can be replaced by robust ECG monitoring and exposure-response (ER) analysis of data generated from First-in-Man single ascending dose (SAD) studies. Six marketed drugs with well-characterized QTc effects were identified in discussions with FDA; five have caused QT prolongation above the threshold of regulatory concern. Twenty healthy subjects will be enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled study designed with the intent to have similar power to exclude small QTc effects as a SAD study. Two doses (low and high) of each drug will be given on separate, consecutive days to 9 subjects. Six subjects will receive placebo. Data will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects ER models. Criteria for QT-positive drugs will be the demonstration of an upper bound (UB) of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of the projected QTc effect at the peak plasma level of the lower dose above the threshold of regulatory concern (currently 10 ms) and a positive slope of ER relationship. The criterion for QT-negative drug will be an UB of the CI of the projected QTc effect of the higher dose <10 ms. It is expected that a successful outcome in this study will provide evidence supporting replacement of the TQT study with ECG assessments in standard early clinical development studies for a new chemical entity.

Assessment of the cardiac safety and pharmacokinetics of a short course, twice daily dose of orally-administered mifepristone in healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND: Mifepristone is approved to control hyperglycemia in adults with endogenous Cushing's syndrome and is described as a mildly QTc prolonging drug, based on a TQT study. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of mifepristone on the QTc interval at plasma mifepristone concentrations exceeding those observed in the TQT study. METHODS: Twenty healthy, male volunteers were given three doses of 1200 mg mifepristone every 12 h with a high-fat meal in a randomized, placebo-controlled 2-period crossover study. Holter ECG recordings were made on Day 1 and 2. RESULTS: Eighteen subjects completed the study. Mean peak plasma mifepristone concentrations were 4.01 µg/mL (CV: 31%) on the fi rst dose and 5.77 µg/mL (CV: 29%) on the third dose. Mifepristone did not have a meaningful QTc effect. The placebo-corrected, change-from- -baseline QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was between -1.6 and 0.7 ms on the fi rst dose (upper bound of 90% CI 3.8 ms) and the largest ΔΔQTcF on the third dose was 4.9 ms (upper bound of 90% CI: 8.4 ms). Concentration effect modeling showed a slightly negative slope of -0.01 ms/ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone did not cause a clinically meaningful QTc prolongation in healthy volunteers at plasma concent rations of mifepristone and its main metabolites that clearly exceeded those seen in a previous TQT study.

Early QT assessment--how can our confidence in the data be improved?

Exposure-response (ER) analysis has emerged as an important tool to interpret QT data from thorough QT (TQT) studies and allows the prediction of effects in the targeted patient population. Recently, ER analysis has also been applied to data from early clinical pharmacology studies, such as single and multiple ascending dose studies, in which high plasma concentrations are often achieved. In line with this, there is an on-going discussion between sponsors, academicians and regulators on whether 'early QT assessment' can provide sufficiently high confidence in assessment of QT prolongation to replace the TQT study. In this article, we discuss how QT assessment can be applied to early clinical studies ('early QT assessment') and what we believe is needed to achieve the same high confidence in the data as we currently obtain from data from the TQT study. The power to exclude a QTc effect exceeding 10 ms in small sample sizes using ER analysis will be discussed and compared with time-matched analysis, as described in the ICH E14 guidance. Two examples of early QT assessment are shared; one negative and one positive, and the challenge in terms of demonstrating assay sensitivity in the absence of a pharmacological positive control will be discussed. Finally, we describe a recent research proposal, which may generate data to support the replacement of the TQT study with data from QT assessment in early phase 1 studies.

A phase I, open-label, single-arm study for QT assessment of eribulin mesylate in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Several cancer therapies can prolong cardiac repolarization. This study assessed the potential of eribulin to affect cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: In this Phase I, open-label, single-arm study, patients received eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m(2); Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). The primary objective was to assess the effect of eribulin on the QTcF pre- and post-infusion; QTcF and QTcNi were compared for ability to remove heart-rate dependence of the QT interval. Relationship between concentration of eribulin and ΔQTc was explored using linear mixed-effects analysis. Secondary objectives explored pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. QTcNi was more effective than QTcF in correcting for heart-rate dependency of the QT interval. On Day 1, mean ΔQTcNi were ~0 at all timepoints. An apparent time-dependent increase in ΔQTc was observed: on Day 8, changes from baseline were larger and more variable, without clear relation to plasma levels of eribulin. Day 8 predose ΔQTcNi was 5 ms, post-infusion mean values ranged from 2 to 9 ms (largest mean ΔQTcNi at 6 h). No new or unexpected toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: Eribulin demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and a minor prolongation of QTc not expected to be of clinical concern in oncology patients.

The thorough QT/QTc study 4 years after the implementation of the ICH E14 guidance.

The ICH E14 guidance on how to clinically assess a new drug's liability to prolong the QT interval was adopted in May 2005. A centre-piece of the guidance was the establishment of one single trial, the 'thorough QT/QTc study', intended to confidently identify drugs that may cause QT prolongation. Initially perceived as a great challenge, this study has rapidly become a standard component of all clinical development programs for new molecular entities. The study is normally conducted in healthy volunteers, includes both a positive and a negative (placebo) control and is stringently powered to exclude an effect on the QTc interval exceeding 10 ms. The E14 guidance was intentionally not very prescriptive and allowed sponsors and service providers to explore new methodologies. This has allowed for a rapid development of new methods during the first years after the guidance's implementation, such as computer-assisted algorithms for QT measurements. Regulators have worked in close collaboration with pharmaceutical industry to set standards for the design and conduct of the 'thorough QT/QTc study', which therefore has evolved as a key component of cardiac safety assessment of new drugs. This paper summarizes the requirements on the 'thorough QT/QTc study' with emphasis on the standard that has evolved based on interactions between regulators and sponsors and the experience from a large number of completed studies.

Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for nonantiarrhythmic drugs: the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline.

Proarrhythmias due to drug-induced QT prolongation are the second most common cause for drug withdrawal and have caused increasing concern. Two new International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines were recently endorsed in which nonclinical (S7B) and clinical (E14) methodologies are discussed and guidance is given to the industry. This commentary describes the key components of the E14 document, the impact of nonclinical testing on the clinical program, the thorough QT study, and the impact of its result on late-stage development. The studies described in S7B and E14 will contribute to a better understanding of the link between nonclinical assays and QT prolongation in humans. Differences in interpretation among individual regulators in the major regions with respect to measures proposed in the E14 guideline might impact regional regulatory decisions. These differences include the value of nonclinical assays for the subsequent clinical testing and how predictive a negative thorough QT study result is for proarrhythmic risk in patients.

Electrocardiographic identification of drug-induced QT prolongation: assessment by different recording and measurement methods.

BACKGROUND: Careful assessment of QT interval prolongation is required before novel drugs are approved by regulatory authorities. The choice of the most appropriate method of electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition and QT/RR interval measurement in clinical trials requires better understanding of the differences among currently available approaches. This study compared standard and Holter-derived 12-lead ECGs for utility in detecting sotalol-induced QT/QTc and RR changes. Manual methods (digitizing pad and digital on-screen calipers) were compared for precision of QT and RR interval measurement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen hundred pairs of serial 12-lead digital ECGs were recorded simultaneously by standard resting ECG device and by continuous 12-lead digital Holter over 3 days in 39 healthy male and female volunteers. No therapy was given on the 1st day followed by 160 mg and 320 mg of sotalol on the 2nd and 3rd day, respectively. Holter-derived and standard ECGs produced nearly identical sotalol-induced QT/QTc and RR changes from baseline, as did the manual digipad and on-screen caliper measurements. The variability of on-screen QT measurement in this study was greater than that of digipad. CONCLUSIONS: Digital 12-lead Holter and standard 12-lead ECG recorders, as well as the manual digitizing pad and digital on-screen calipers, are of equal utility for the assessment of drug-induced change from baseline in QT and RR interval, although the variability of the on-screen method in this study was greater than of the digipad.