Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
3.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 11(12): 735-778, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30530635

RESUMO

The recent pace, extent, and impact of paradigm-changing cancer prevention science has been remarkable. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) convened a 3-day summit, aligned with five research priorities: (i) Precancer Atlas (PCA). (ii) Cancer interception. (iii) Obesity-cancer linkage, a global epidemic of chronic low-grade inflammation. (iv) Implementation science. (v) Cancer disparities. Aligned with these priorities, AACR co-led the Lancet Commission to formally endorse and accelerate the NCI Cancer Moonshot program, facilitating new global collaborative efforts in cancer control. The expanding scope of creative impact is perhaps most startling-from NCI-funded built environments to AACR Team Science Awarded studies of Asian cancer genomes informing global primary prevention policies; cell-free epigenetic marks identifying incipient neoplastic site; practice-changing genomic subclasses in myeloproliferative neoplasia (including germline variant tightly linked to JAK2 V617F haplotype); universal germline genetic testing for pancreatic cancer; and repurposing drugs targeting immune- and stem-cell signals (e.g., IL-1ß, PD-1, RANK-L) to cancer interception. Microbiota-driven IL-17 can induce stemness and transformation in pancreatic precursors (identifying another repurposing opportunity). Notable progress also includes hosting an obesity special conference (connecting epidemiologic and molecular perspectives to inform cancer research and prevention strategies), co-leading concerted national implementation efforts in HPV vaccination, and charting the future elimination of cancer disparities by integrating new science tools, discoveries and perspectives into community-engaged research, including targeted counter attacks on e-cigarette ad exploitation of children, Hispanics and Blacks. Following this summit, two unprecedented funding initiatives were catalyzed to drive cancer prevention research: the NCI Cancer Moonshot (e.g., PCA and disparities); and the AACR-Stand Up To Cancer bold "Cancer Interception" initiative.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevenção Primária/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Congressos como Assunto , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Prevenção Primária/tendências , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Sociedades Científicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Científicas/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 32(19): 2078-99, 2014 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24799465

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on systemic therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic literature review from January 2009 to October 2012. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials met the systematic review criteria. The CLEOPATRA trial found survival and PFS benefits for docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in first-line treatment, and the EMILIA trial found survival and PFS benefits for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line treatment. T-DM1 also showed a third-line PFS benefit. One trial reported on duration of HER2-targeted therapy, and three others reported on endocrine therapy for patients with HER-positive advanced breast cancer. RECOMMENDATIONS: HER2-targeted therapy is recommended for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, except for those with clinical congestive heart failure or significantly compromised left ventricular ejection fraction, who should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and taxane for first-line treatment and T-DM1 for second-line treatment are recommended. In the third-line setting, clinicians should offer other HER2-targeted therapy combinations or T-DM1 (if not previously administered) and may offer pertuzumab, if the patient has not previously received it. Optimal duration of chemotherapy is at least 4 to 6 months or until maximum response, depending on toxicity and in the absence of progression. HER2-targeted therapy can continue until time of progression or unacceptable toxicities. For patients with HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer, clinicians may recommend either standard first-line therapy or, for selected patients, endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy or endocrine therapy alone.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansina , Anastrozol , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Comorbidade , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Lapatinib , Letrozol , Maitansina/administração & dosagem , Maitansina/análogos & derivados , Nitrilas/administração & dosagem , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Sociedades Médicas , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Trastuzumab , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 32(19): 2100-8, 2014 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24799487

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide formal expert consensus-based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on the management of brain metastases for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature. When that failed to yield sufficiently strong quality evidence, the Expert Panel undertook a formal expert consensus-based process to produce these recommendations. ASCO used a modified Delphi process. The panel members drafted recommendations, and a group of other experts joined them for two rounds of formal ratings of the recommendations. RESULTS: No studies or existing guidelines met the systematic review criteria; therefore, ASCO conducted a formal expert consensus-based process. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients with brain metastases should receive appropriate local therapy and systemic therapy, if indicated. Local therapies include surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Treatments depend on factors such as patient prognosis, presence of symptoms, resectability, number and size of metastases, prior therapy, and whether metastases are diffuse. Other options include systemic therapy, best supportive care, enrollment onto a clinical trial, and/or palliative care. Clinicians should not perform routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to screen for brain metastases, but rather should have a low threshold for MRI of the brain because of the high incidence of brain metastases among patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Irradiação Craniana , Radiocirurgia , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/química , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Comorbidade , Consenso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
9.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(9): 1616-21, 2010 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177012

RESUMO

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Grants Program began in 1984 with a single $16,000 grant to a young investigator for start-up research funding. In 2009, the Grants Program, now administered by The ASCO Cancer Foundation, awarded more than $6.5 million to 70 different investigators. This article, celebrating the 25th anniversary of this initiative, describes the history and evolution of the Grants Program, attempts to measure the impact of the program on clinical cancer research through an analysis of the career paths of past recipients, and addresses challenges that the program will face as it enters its second 25 years.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Oncologia/economia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Distinções e Prêmios , Organização do Financiamento/economia , Fundações , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Oncologia/história , Neoplasias/economia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/história , Sociedades Médicas/história
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA