RESUMO
Water-displacement and WinRHIZO root-scanning methods were compared for efficacy of root damage assessment. Results from both methods were similar and a highly significant relationship was found between the two methods in trial one (r2 = 0.9968, P < 0.0001) and trial two (r2 = 0.9988, P < 0.0001). Both protocols provide consistent root volume measurements; however, water displacement is preferred as an economical method if a quick evaluation of a large amount of roots is essential. For a more detailed root morphological and architectural analysis, WinRHIZO root scanning provides additional information about several root parameters that cannot be measured by simple water displacement.
RESUMO
Obesity is a complex, multifactorial condition in which excess body fat may put a person at health risk. National data indicate that the prevalence of obesity in the United States is increasing in children and adults. Reversing these trends requires changes in individual behavior and the elimination of societal barriers to healthy lifestyle choices. Basic treatment of overweight and obese patients requires a comprehensive approach involving diet and nutrition, regular physical activity, and behavioral change, with an emphasis on long-term weight management rather than short-term extreme weight reduction. Physicians and other health professionals have an important role in promoting preventive measures and encouraging positive lifestyle behaviors, as well as identifying and treating obesity-related comorbidities. Health professionals also have a role in counseling patients about safe and effective weight loss and weight maintenance programs. Recent evidence-based guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, as well as recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, American Obesity Association, U.S. Clinical Preventive Services Task Force, Institute of Medicine, and World Health Organization can be consulted for information and guidance on the identification and management of overweight and obese patients.
Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Dieta , Ingestão de Energia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/métodos , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , American Medical Association , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/terapia , Papel do Médico , Formulação de Políticas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Redução de PesoAssuntos
Consentimento Presumido , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/organização & administração , Governo Federal , Regulamentação Governamental , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Programas Obrigatórios , Transplante de Órgãos , Seleção de Pacientes , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Litigation and regulatory assaults on the tobacco companies may create a willingness among tobacco manufacturers to bargain resources and acceptance of public policy changes for limitations of liability, as has been seen by the recent settlement with the Liggett Group. Two elements absolutely critical to any plan are the elimination of tobacco advertising and promotion and the removal of addiction as a reason for tobacco use. Minimal components of any settlement should include: (a) acceptance by the tobacco manufacturers of the causal relationship between tobacco use and disease, and the addictive nature of nicotine; (b) a total ban on tobacco advertising and promotion; (c) FDA jurisdiction over tobacco products and their nicotine content, with the intent of removing nicotine as soon as acceptable nicotine substitution products are available; (d) reimbursement to the states for Medicaid and other state expenditures attributable to smoking, to the maximum extent feasible; (e) funding for local, state, and federal programmes and research in tobacco control; (f) acceptance of legislation and regulations protecting the right of non-smokers to breathe air free of tobacco smoke; (g) funding for a large, national, media-led, anti-tobacco campaign; and (h) cessation assistance for addicted smokers. If negotiations toward a settlement proceed, it is essential that the public health community participate in defining the elements of any agreement to ensure that whatever agreement develops is focused on reducing tobacco-related disease rather than continuing the profitability of American tobacco companies. That participation requires articulation of the core elements essential to an acceptable agreement. If resolution of the public health issues surrounding continued sale of tobacco products can be reached in the United States, it may provide a model for similar resolution in other countries.
Assuntos
Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Indústria do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , Plantas Tóxicas , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria do Tabaco/economia , Tabaco sem Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The health hazards due to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are increasingly established. ETS contains thousands of chemicals including 43 known carcinogens. Known health effects of ETS exposure are lung cancer in nonsmokers, childhood disorders such as bronchitis, and perhaps, heart disease. Workplace exposure to ETS is widespread and is influenced strongly by the type of smoking policy in the workplace. To decrease ETS exposure, efforts to restrict public smoking have proliferated over the past decade. These restrictions have emanated from government as well as voluntary measures by various private industries. Bans on public smoking are effective in reducing nonsmokers' exposure to ETS. Workplace smoking bans also influence the intensity of smoking among employees and may increase quit smoking rates. In addition to the health benefits from smoke-free workplaces, there are likely cost savings to employers who implement such policies.
Assuntos
Saúde Ambiental , Política de Saúde , Saúde Pública , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Saúde Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/economia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Publicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Alaska , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Masculino , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Nicotiana , Plantas Tóxicas , Administração em Saúde Pública/tendências , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , Publicidade , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Difusão de Inovações , Feminino , Previsões , Educação em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Política Pública , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/psicologia , Impostos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
To investigate the possibility that self-reported smoking is not a valid measure for assessing trends in smoking prevalence, we compared total self-reported cigarette consumption with the adjusted consumption data from cigarette excise taxes as reported by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the period 1974 through 1985. Self-reported consumption was calculated by using data from the National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) for adults and from the National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse for adolescents. For this period, the average ratio of self-reported cigarette consumption to the USDA estimate of consumption was 0.72 (range = 0.69 to 0.78). There was no statistical difference in this consumption ratio from year to year, indicating no apparent increase in the underreporting of cigarette smoking in these surveys. We conclude that cross-sectional surveys of self-reported smoking status remain a reliable surveillance tool for monitoring changes in population smoking behavior.
Assuntos
Fumar/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Vigilância da População , Projetos de Pesquisa , Mudança Social , Impostos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Data from National Health Interview Surveys from 1974 through 1985 are used to project cigarette smoking prevalence to the year 2000. Smoking prevalence in the United States has declined at a linear rate since 1974. If this trend continues, in the year 2000, 22% of the adult population (40 million Americans) will be smokers. By the year 2000, the major inequalities in prevalence will occur among educational categories. At least 30% of those who have not proceeded beyond a high school education will be smokers, whereas less than 10% of college graduates will smoke. Among the other sociodemographic subgroups, smoking prevalence is expected to decrease by the year 2000 to 20% among men, to 23% among women, to 25% among blacks, and to 21% among whites. Between 1974 and 1985, approximately 1.3 million persons per year became former smokers, indicating considerable success in public health efforts to encourage people to stop smoking. However, in the early 1980s, approximately 1 million new young persons per year were recruited to the ranks of regular smokers. This is equivalent to about 3000 new smokers each day. Public health efforts need to focus more on preventing young people from starting to smoke, and such prevention efforts should particularly target less educated socioeconomic groups.
Assuntos
Fumar/tendências , Adulto , Escolaridade , Feminino , Previsões , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/epidemiologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This study compares the cost-effectiveness of six vaccination strategies during a measles outbreak: vaccination of all susceptibles 15 months of age or older and born after 1956 (the current routine strategy); lowering the recommended age at vaccination from 15 to 12 months (plus current routine strategy); lowering the recommended age at vaccination to six months (plus current routine strategy); revaccination of those vaccinated at 12-14 months of age (plus current routine strategy); vaccination of all students in school regardless of immune status; and vaccination of all residents 15 months to 28 years of age in the community regardless of immune status. The analysis is based on the hypothetical, early application of these strategies to a 1985 measles outbreak in Montana, which occurred despite appropriate application of current prevention and control recommendations. Although the results are applicable only to this particular outbreak, this analysis provides an approach which can be used in other settings to assess measles outbreak control strategies. Similar studies would need to be performed in a variety of settings to determine the most cost-effective measles outbreak control strategies overall.
Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/economia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Surtos de Doenças/economia , Humanos , Imunização Secundária/economia , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Lactente , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/transmissão , Vacina contra Sarampo/normas , Montana , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação/economiaRESUMO
Because the nation's health is so greatly influenced by cigarette smoking, this report examines current trends in cigarette advertising and marketing. According to the Federal Trade Commission, total cigarette advertising and promotional expenditures reached $2.1 billion in 1984. From 1974 through 1984, total expenditures increased approximately sevenfold, or threefold after adjustment according to the consumer price index. In 1985, cigarette advertising expenditures accounted for 22.3 percent, 7.1 percent, and 0.8 percent of total advertising expenditures in outdoor media, magazines, and newspapers, respectively. When all products and services were ranked according to national advertising expenditures, cigarettes were first in the outdoor media, second in magazines, and third in newspapers. The proportion of total cigarette advertising and promotional expenditures devoted to promotional activities has increased steadily, from 25.5 percent in 1975 to 47.6 percent in 1984. The proportion of expenditures for cigarettes yielding 15 mg or less of "tar" has increased substantially and has consistently exceeded the domestic market share of these cigarettes. The fastest growing markets are discounted cigarettes and brands containing 25 cigarettes per pack. Several advertising campaigns have targeted women, minorities, and blue-collar workers. The study of these marketing trends should assist health officials in identifying and predicting patterns of cigarette use and in developing health promotion programs that counteract the influence of advertising by incorporating similar, effective techniques.