Prevalence of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure in Autoimmune Hepatitis, Treatment Response and Mortality Burden Assessment: A Region-Predominant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a global health problem. Little scientific evidence exists on its prevalence in autoimmune hepatitis. Treatment response and mortality outcomes have also been reported differently. The study was conducted to estimate the overall prevalence of ACLF among patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and determine the associated treatment response and mortality. We scrutinized wide literature in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and assessed published articles completely, studies performed and reported from around the globe, until December 07, 2023, according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42023412176). Studies (retrospective and prospective cohort study type) that stated the ACLF development among established AIH cases were considered. Features of the study, duration of follow-up, and numeric patient information were retrieved from the studies included. The research paper quality was checked for risk of bias. Random effect meta-analysis with metaregression and subsection scrutinies were performed with R. The main outcome was the collective prevalence of ACLF in the AIH patients, whereas treatment response and mortality in AIH-associated ACLF were secondary outcomes. Six studies were involved with confirmed diagnoses in 985 AIH patients for the data synthesis. The pooled prevalence of ACLF in the explored patients was 12% (95% CI: 8-17) ( P =0.01). Heterogeneity was found to be high in the present meta-analysis ( I2 =72%; P < 0.01). For the secondary endpoint analysis, the pooled prevalence of complete remission at 1-year follow-up was 71% (0.52; 0.85), and mortality from the ACLF-AIH patient population was 32% (95% CI: 18-50). Sensitivity analysis showed no influence on the overall estimations of the pooled prevalence of ACLF by omitting studies one by one. One in 10 AIH patients likely present with ACLF. The response to treatment is seen in two-thirds of patients, and mortality is high.

Simple bedside tests of muscle strength and function correlate with computed tomography-skeletal muscle index for assessment of sarcopenia in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia assessment can be done by skeletal muscle index (SMI) or bedside tests such as handgrip strength (HGS) and gait speed (GS). GOALS: This study evaluated the correlations of HGS and GS with SMI, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognition and assessed them as predictors of mortality. STUDY: As many as 116 outpatients with cirrhosis were included in this prospective cohort study. Assessment for sarcopenia was done by SMI, HGS and GS. HRQOL was assessed using the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) and fatigue severity scale (FSS). Cognition was assessed by mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Correlations of HGS and GS with SMI, HRQOL and cognition were analyzed. Area under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to compare them as predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) was the commonest etiology of cirrhosis followed by hepatitis C (12.9%). Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 64 (55.2%) patients. A strong correlation was seen between SMI and HGS (ρ = 0.78) and GS (ρ = 0.65). AUCs of GS (0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.96) was maximum, followed by HGS (95% CI, 0.86 [0.78-0.93] and SMI [95% CI, 0.8 0.71-0.88]) in predicting mortality (p > 0.05). CLDQ (3.2 vs. 5.6, p < 0.01) and MMSE scores (24.3 vs. 26.3, p < 0.01) were lower, whereas FSS score (5.7 vs. 3.1, p < 0.01) was higher in patients with sarcopenia. CLDQ (ρ = 0.83) and MMSE (ρ = 0.73) showed the strongest correlation with HGS, whereas FSS correlated well (ρ = 0.77) with GS. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside tests of muscle strength and function, including HGS and GS, correlate strongly with SMI for sarcopenia assessment and prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Assessment of Sarcopenia Using Muscle Ultrasound in Patients With Cirrhosis and Sarcopenic Obesity (AMUSE STUDY).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarcopenic obesity (SO) marks a confluence of 2 complex entities involving the muscle-liver-adipose tissue axis. Computed tomographic (CT) scan-derived skeletal muscle index (SMI) remains the gold standard for sarcopenia assessment in SO. However, it has intrinsic limitations of cost, radiation, and point of care applicability. We assessed the role of muscle ultrasound (US) in SO. METHODS: A total of 52 patients with cirrhosis and obesity were assessed for sarcopenia using SMI. US assessment of thigh and forearm muscles was done to record quadriceps muscle thickness (QMT), quadriceps feather index (QMFI), forearm muscle thickness (FMT), and forearm feather index (FFI), respectively. Evaluated US parameters were correlated with SMI and assessed for diagnostic accuracy using the area under the curve. RESULTS: A total of 40 (76.9%) males and 12 (23.1%) females [mean age: 50.9 y (43.8 to 53.5 y)] were included. QMT [0.45 cm/m 2 (0.42 to 0.48 cm/m 2 ) vs. 0.67 cm/m 2 (0.63 to 0.70 cm/m 2 )], QMFI [0.82 cm/m 2 (0.77 to 0.87 cm/m 2 ) vs. 1.12 cm/m 2 (1.06 to 1.19 cm/m 2 )], FMT [0.19 cm/m 2 (0.17 to 0.20 cm/m 2 ) vs. 0.25 cm/m 2 (0.23 to 0.27 cm/m 2 )], and FFI [0.38 cm/m 2 (0.35 to 0.412 cm/m 2 ) vs. 0.47 cm/m 2 (0.44 to 0.50 cm/m 2 )] were significantly lower in patients with SO ( P <0.01). A positive correlation with SMI was seen for all parameters in the entire cohort. The strongest correlation was exhibited by QMT ( r =0.70) and QMFI ( r =0.70) in males. The area under the curve of QMT, QMFI, FMT, and FFI were 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-1), 0.95 (0.89-1), 0.85 (0.75-0.96), and 0.80 (0.68-0.93), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: US-based assessment of sarcopenia has excellent diagnostic accuracy and correlates well with computed tomography-SMI in patients with SO. US may serve as an easy-to-use, point of care tool for assessing sarcopenia in SO with the advantage of repeated sequential assessment.

Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has hampered health care delivery globally. We evaluated the feasibility, outcomes, and safety of telehepatology in delivering quality care amid the pandemic. A telemedicine setup using smartphones by hepatologists was organized at our tertiary-care center after pilot testing. Consecutive patients availing telehepatology services were recruited between March and July 2020. An adapted model for assessment of telemedicine was used after validity and reliability testing, to evaluate services 7-21 days after index teleconsultation. Of the 1,419 registrations, 1,281 (90.3%) consultations were completed. From 245 randomly surveyed patients, 210 (85.7%) responded (age [years, interquartile range]: 46 [35-56]; 32.3% females). Seventy percent of patients belonged to the middle or lower socio-economic class, whereas 61% were from rural areas. Modes of teleconsultation were audio (54.3%) or hybrid video call (45.7%). Teleconsultation alone was deemed suitable in 88.6% of patients. Diagnosis and compliance rates were 94% and 82.4%, respectively. Patients' convenience rate, satisfaction rate, improvement rate, success rate, and net promoter scores were 99.0%, 85.2%, 49.5%, 46.2% and 70, respectively. Physical and mental quality of life improved in 67.1% and 82.8% of patients, respectively, following index teleconsultation. Person-hours and money spent by patients were significantly lower with teleconsultation (P < 0.001); however, person-hours spent by hospital per teleconsultation were higher than in physical outpatient services (P < 0.001). Dissatisfied patients were more likely to have lower diagnosis rate, unsuitability for teleconsultation, noncompliance, poorer understanding, and uncomfortable conversation during teleconsultation. Connectivity issues (22.9%) were the most common barrier. Three patients, all of whom were advised emergency care during teleconsultation, succumbed to their illness. Conclusion: Telehepatology is a feasible and reasonably effective tool for rendering health care services using smartphones during the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic implementation, possible integration into routine health care delivery, and formal cost-effectiveness of telehepatology services need further exploration.