Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism-Ten Key Questions and Answers: A Practical Guide.

Edoxaban is the fourth non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant now available for clinical use in the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) and in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), after the completion of large-scale randomized comparative clinical trials with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Edoxaban has some peculiar pharmacological properties and outcome data. Here a group of experts in AF and VTE answers a set of questions on its practical use, trying to define the profile of patients that would be most appropriate for its use.

Polypill: quo vadis?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still the leading cause of death worldwide. The overall growth of this epidemic during the last decade is largely because of the increasing incidence of CVD in low and middle-income countries, where inadequate health policies, poor availability, and lack of affordable medications, as well as poor patient adherence to treatment all limit the efficacy of cardiovascular prevention strategies. Complementary to a promotion of healthy lifestyles, a fixed dose combination or a 'polypill,' containing two or more drugs addressed at controlling various risk factors, might reduce costs and improve patient accessibility and adherence to treatment. As of now, several clinical trials have shown that combination pills are well tolerated and decrease risk factors for CVD, with a projected improvement of end points by as much as 60-70% by reducing blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, uncertainty remains about changes of hard end points, long-term adherence, cost-effectiveness and the 'medicalization' of asymptomatic individuals who account for a large percentage of the world population. Because cardiovascular risk increases significantly for patients aged more than 50 years, it has been proposed to use a polypill to treat specifically all such patients. However, approach to be neither practical nor cost-effective, because it involves a large number of patients at low risk. Some investigators have suggested to incorporate the Coronary Artery Calcium Score with the Framingham Risk Score to identify a suitable target population of patients benefitting most from the polypill. Trials in progress will shed light on several issues currently debated and unresolved.

Bivalirudin for acute coronary syndromes: premises, promises and doubts.

Bivalirudin is a valuable anticoagulant option in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Advantages over heparin as a parenteral anticoagulant include more predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, shorter half-life, no need for cofactors, some degree of antiplatelet effect, and the ability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Clinical evidence supporting the use of bivalirudin over heparin in current ACS guidelines, however, derives mostly from early randomised trials that may no longer reflect current management patterns, now including the use of oral antiplatelet agents more potent than clopidogrel (i.e. prasugrel or ticagrelor) and a broader implementation of strategies to reduce bleeding (i.e. radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors only in bailout situations). Defining the fine balance between bivalirudin efficacy and safety over heparins in the context of other antithrombotic treatments remains a challenge in clinical practice, particularly in a fast-evolving scenario, such as ACS, where numerous new trials have been presented in very recent times. Here we provide an up-to-date overview of the evidence on the use of bivalirudin in ACS, with focus on new data, open issues, and future directions.

Growth differentiation factor 15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, for risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), high-sensitivity troponin, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels are predictive of death and cardiovascular events in healthy elderly subjects, patients with acute coronary syndrome, and patients with heart failure. High-sensitivity troponin I and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide are also prognostic in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the prognostic value of GDF-15 alone and in addition to clinical characteristics and other biomarkers in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial randomized 18 201 patients with atrial fibrillation to apixaban or warfarin. Biomarkers were measured at randomization in 14 798 patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes during 1.9 years of follow-up were compared across quartiles of GDF-15 by use of Cox analyses adjusted for clinical characteristics, randomized treatment, and other biomarkers. The GDF-15 level showed a median of 1383 ng/L (interquartile range, 977-2052 ng/L). Annual rates of stroke or systemic embolism ranged from 0.9% to 2.03% (P<0.001); of major bleeding, from 1.22% to 4.53% (P<0.001); and of mortality, from 1.34% to 7.19% (P<0.001) in the lowest compared with the highest GDF-15 quartile. The prognostic information provided by GDF-15 was independent of clinical characteristics and clinical risk scores. Adjustment for the other cardiac biomarkers attenuated the prognostic value for stroke, whereas the prognostic value for mortality and major bleeding remained. Apixaban consistently reduced stroke, mortality, and bleeding, regardless of GDF-15 levels. CONCLUSIONS: GDF-15 is a risk factor for major bleeding, mortality, and stroke in atrial fibrillation. The prognostic value for major bleeding and death remained even in the presence of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin I. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper.

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that-compared with men-women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, as well as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of the available data, we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive from observational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles.

Refining the assessment of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: the load-to-damage relationship.

AIMS: Comparing the nephrotoxicity of individual contrast agents is challenging, as contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), a widely used trial endpoint, is unable to discriminate between contrast-related and contrast-unrelated causes of renal damage. We established a quantitative method to selectively evaluate the dose-dependent nephrotoxic effect of different contrast agents. METHODS: We randomized 113 patients undergoing coronary procedures to either iodixanol 320 mg/ml or iobitridol 350 mg/ml. We calculated baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) and postprocedural change in serum creatinine. We then calculated the regression of the individual iodine load against the creatinine maximum change [load-to-damage relationship (LDR)]. We assumed that its R estimates the predictive accuracy of contrast dose-dependent effects on renal function changes, and that the slope of the LDR characterizes the intrinsic nephrotoxicity of the contrast. We also performed a semi-quantitative evaluation of procedural complexity to assess its complementary role in postprocedural AKI. RESULTS: We found significant correlations between contrast load and creatinine changes for both iobitridol (R: 0.29; P <0.0001) and iodixanol (R: 0.15; P = 0.00028). The LDR slope was, however, significantly steeper for iobitridol compared with iodixanol (19.03 ±â€Š4.02 vs. 14.50 ±â€Š4.63 Cr*CrCl/I; P <0.001) and in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients (24.35 ±â€Š4.96 vs. 4.59 ±â€Š3.25 Cr*CrCl/I; P <0.001). Adding the procedural complexity score to the contrast load significantly increased the predictive ability of the regression model for postprocedural renal function changes (P < 0.02 for the R increase in overall population), suggesting a role for procedural complexity in postprocedural renal function damage. CONCLUSION: The LDR slope is a promising method to evaluate the specific contrast-related fraction of postprocedural AKI.

MR angiography, MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in-vivo assessment of skeletal muscle ischemia in diabetic rats.

To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of using magnetic resonance (MR) techniques for in-vivo assessing a rat diabetic model of limb ischemia. Unilateral hind limb ischemia was induced by ligation of the iliac-femoral artery in male streptozotocin-treated and non-diabetic control rats. Four weeks after ligation, rats underwent MR Angiography (MRA), T(1)-weighted and Short Time Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequences and muscle Proton MR Spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) on both hind limbs. After MR examinations, immunoblotting and immunofluorescence analysis were performed. MRA showed a signal void due to flow discontinuation distal to the artery ligation. T(1)-weighted and STIR images showed, respectively, the presence of tissue swelling (p = 0.018 for non-diabetic; p = 0.027 for diabetic rats) and signal hyperintensity in tissue affected by occlusion. Mean total creatine/water for the occluded limb was significantly lower than for the non-occluded limbs in both non-diabetic (5.46×10(-4) vs 1.14×10(-3), p = 0.028) and diabetic rats (1.37×10(-4) vs 1.10×10(-3); p = 0.018). MR Imaging and (1)H-MRS changes were more pronounced in diabetic than in non-diabetic occluded limbs (p = 0.032). MR findings were confirmed by using histological findings. Combined MR techniques can be used to demonstrate the presence of structural and metabolic changes produced by iliac-femoral artery occlusion in rat diabetic model of limb ischemia.

The usefulness of the anaerobic threshold in the assessment and prognostic evaluation of the patient with dyspnea.

The anaerobic threshold (AT) is defined as the oxygen consumption level above which energy production becomes determined by anaerobic metabolism, which causes a sustained increase in lactate and metabolic acidosis. The AT, as measured by cardiopulmonary stress testing, is ubiquitously used to determine the prognosis and diagnosis of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. This measurement can help clinicians in the functional evaluation of patients and as guidance for rehabilitation and therapy. This article reviews the pathophysiological aspects and methods of measurement of the AT during a cardiopulmonary stress test, and its clinical use in assessing cardiac and respiratory diseases.