Nutritional assessment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective multicentre study.

Background: Nutritional status impacts quality of life and prognosis of patients with respiratory diseases, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is a lack of studies performing an extensive nutritional assessment of IPF patients. This study aimed to investigate the nutritional status and to identify nutritional phenotypes in a cohort of IPF patients at diagnosis. Methods: Patients underwent a thorough pulmonary and nutritional evaluation including questionnaires on nutritional status, and physical activity, anthropometry, body impedance, dynamometry, 4-m gait speed and blood tests. Results: 90 IPF patients (78.9% males, mean age 72.7 years) were enrolled. The majority of patients were classified as Gender-Age-Physiology Index stage 2 (47, 52.2%) with an inactive lifestyle according to International Physical Activity Questionnaire score (39, 43.3%), and had mean forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 86.5% and 54.2%, respectively. In regards to nutritional phenotypes, the majority of patients were normally nourished (67.8%, 95% CI 58.6-77.7%), followed by non-sarcopenic obese (25.3%, 95% CI 16.1-35.2%), sarcopenic (4.6%, 95% CI 0.0-14.5%) and sarcopenic obese (2.3%, 95% CI 0.0-12.2%). Among the normally nourished, 49.2% showed early signs of nutritional and physical performance alterations, including body mass index ≥30 kg·m-2 in 4.3%, history of weight loss ≥5% in 11.9%, and reduction of gait speed and hand grip strength in 11.9% and 35.6%, respectively. Low vitamin D values were observed in 56.3% of cases. Conclusions: IPF patients at diagnosis are mainly normally nourished and obese, but early signs of nutritional and physical performance impairment can already be identified at this stage.

Utility of autoimmune serology testing in the assessment of uncharacterized interstitial lung disease: a large retrospective cohort review.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune serologies are often obtained in the initial evaluation of uncharacterized interstitial lung disease (ILD). Whether this practice is helpful in delineating connective-tissue disease related ILD (CTD-ILD) is not well known. We assessed the frequency of incident CTD-ILD as detected by autoimmune serology testing and presenting clinical signs and symptoms. METHODS: Consecutive patients seen at our institution over a four year period with newly diagnosed uncharacterized ILD and autoimmune serologic testing were included. Serologic assessment was performed as a standardized order set of 13 laboratory tests. Presenting demographics and clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of autoimmune disease were correlated with the presence or absence of positive serology studies and final CTD-ILD diagnoses. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of newly diagnosed CTD-ILD was 6.9% (42 of 605). Positive serology was seen in 35.2% (213 of 605) of screened ILD. CTD-ILD was diagnosed in 19.2% of those with positive serology, and 52.8% of those with both positive serology and suggestive clinical signs or symptoms. Only 1.4% of those with positive serology and negative review of systems were diagnosed with CTD-ILD. CTD-ILD diagnoses were made more frequently in younger patients ≤60 years with no diagnoses made after the age of 80 (P = 0.009). Positive serology in non-CTD-ILD cases did not appear to confer any survival advantage. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of autoimmune serology testing in uncharacterized ILD appears greatest in those with suggestive clinical signs or symptoms on presentation for CTD-ILD.