COVID-19 free oncologic surgical hub: The experience of reallocation of a gynecologic oncology unit during pandemic outbreak.

INTRODUCTION: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the majority of healthcare resources of the affected Italian regions were allocated to COVID-19 patients. Due to lack of resources and high risk of death, most cancer patients have been shifted to non-surgical treatments. The following reports our experience of a Gynaecologic Oncology Unit's reallocation of resources in a COVID-19 free surgical oncologic hub in order to guarantee standard quality of surgical activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study performed in the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, on the outcomes of the reallocation of surgical activities outside the University Hospital of Bologna, Italy, during the Italian lockdown period. Here, we described our COVID-19 free surgical oncologic pathway, in terms of lifestyle restrictions, COVID-19 screening measures, and patient clinical, surgical and follow up outcomes. RESULTS: During the lockdown period (March 9th - May 4th, 2020), 83 patients were scheduled for oncological surgery, 51 patients underwent surgery. Compared to pre-COVID period, we performed the same activities: number of cases scheduled for surgery, type of surgery and surgical and oncological results. No cases of COVID-19 infection were recorded in operated patients and in medical staff. Patients were compliant and well accepted the lifestyle restrictions and reorganization of the care. CONCLUSIONSONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that the prioritization of oncological surgical care and the allocation of resources during a pandemic in COVID-19 free surgical hubs is an appropriate choice to guarantee oncological protocols.

A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal sonography (TVS) and intraoperative frozen section (FS) in the assessment of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma, having the definitive histological examination as gold standard. METHODS: 155 consecutive women (mean age 63 years, range 32-88) diagnosed as having endometrial carcinoma were prospectively evaluated at TVS in order to preoperatively stage the disease. All the patients subsequently underwent complete surgical staging including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, pelvic and lumboaortic lymphadenectomy. After removal of the uterus, intraoperative FS was performed by pathologists with special interest in gynaecologic oncology in a predefined, standardized manner. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both modalities as regards neoplastic invasion of the myometrium. RESULTS: Overall, 131 women (84.5%) had an endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 8 (5.2%) an adenosquamos carcinoma, 7 (4.5%) a serous papillary carcinoma, 4 (2.6%) a clear cell carcinoma, 3 (1.9%) a mixed type carcinoma, 1 (0.6%) a carcinosarcoma, and 1 (0.6%) a mesodermal mixed malignant tumor. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy for TVS in the evaluation of myometrial infiltration were: 75%, 89%, 86%, 79% and 81%. Corresponding features for FS were: 92%, 92%, 89%, 94% and 92%. The diagnostic performance of FS was higher than that of TVS (Cohen's K value: 0.841; p<0.0005). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative FS performed better than preoperative TVS in the assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer. Despite being time consuming, FS can be regarded as a useful modality in order to decide whether to perform lymphadenectomy in cases with poor visualization of the endometrium at TVS and when TVS gives inconclusive results.