Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for 1p/19q Codeletion and IDH1-IDH2 Mutational Analysis Uncovers Mistaken Overdiagnoses of 1p/19q Codeletion by FISH.

The 1p/19q codeletion is the result of a translocation between chromosome 1 (Chr1p) and chromosome 19 (Chr19q) with the loss of derivative (1;19)(p10;q10) chromosome. The 1p/19q codeletion has predictive and prognostic significance, and it is essential for the classification of gliomas. In routine practice, the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnosis of 1p/19q codeletion is sometimes unexpected. This study aimed to develop a next-generation sequencing panel for the concurrent definition of the 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1/IDH2 mutation status to resolve these equivocal cases. A total of 65 glioma samples were investigated using a 1p/19q-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-IDH panel. The panel consists of 192 amplicons, including SNPs mapping to Chr1 and Chr19 and amplicons for IDH1/IDH2 analysis. The 1p/19q SNP-IDH panel consistently identified IDH1/IDH2 mutations. In 49 of 60 cases (81.7%), it provided the same 1p/19q results obtained by FISH. In the remaining 11 cases, the 1p/19q SNP-IDH panel uncovered partial chromosome imbalances as a result of interstitial amplification or deletion of the regions where the FISH probes map, leading to a mistaken overdiagnosis of 1p/19q codeletion by FISH. The 1p/19q SNP-IDH next-generation sequencing panel allows reliable analysis of the 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1/IDH2 mutation at the same time. The panel not only allows resolution of difficult cases but also represents a cost-effective alternative to standard molecular diagnostics procedures.

COVID-19 free oncologic surgical hub: The experience of reallocation of a gynecologic oncology unit during pandemic outbreak.

INTRODUCTION: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the majority of healthcare resources of the affected Italian regions were allocated to COVID-19 patients. Due to lack of resources and high risk of death, most cancer patients have been shifted to non-surgical treatments. The following reports our experience of a Gynaecologic Oncology Unit's reallocation of resources in a COVID-19 free surgical oncologic hub in order to guarantee standard quality of surgical activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study performed in the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, on the outcomes of the reallocation of surgical activities outside the University Hospital of Bologna, Italy, during the Italian lockdown period. Here, we described our COVID-19 free surgical oncologic pathway, in terms of lifestyle restrictions, COVID-19 screening measures, and patient clinical, surgical and follow up outcomes. RESULTS: During the lockdown period (March 9th - May 4th, 2020), 83 patients were scheduled for oncological surgery, 51 patients underwent surgery. Compared to pre-COVID period, we performed the same activities: number of cases scheduled for surgery, type of surgery and surgical and oncological results. No cases of COVID-19 infection were recorded in operated patients and in medical staff. Patients were compliant and well accepted the lifestyle restrictions and reorganization of the care. CONCLUSIONSONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that the prioritization of oncological surgical care and the allocation of resources during a pandemic in COVID-19 free surgical hubs is an appropriate choice to guarantee oncological protocols.

Use of IGK gene rearrangement analysis for clonality assessment of lymphoid malignancies: a single center experience.

Diagnosis of B-non Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) is based on clinical, morphological and immunohistochemi-cal features. However, in up to 10-15% of cases, analysis of immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) or light (IGK/IGL) chains genes is required to discriminate between malignant and reactive lymphoid proliferations. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficiency of IGK analysis in the routine diagnostic of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-LD) when applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Clonality patterns were studied in 59 B-LD using the BIOMED-2 protocol for IGK assays, after failure of the IGH assay. PCR products were evaluated by both heterodu-plex and GeneScan analysis. IGK analysis was technically successful in all cases. Overall, it supported the histopa-thological suspicion in 52/59 cases (88%), the sensitivity and specificity being 83% and 80%, respectively. Further, positive and negative predictive values were 95% and 50%, respectively. Interestingly, among various lymphoma subtypes, marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma most frequently required IGK analysis. In conclusion, IGK study according to the BIOMED-2 protocol resulted feasible and extremely useful in supporting challenging diagnosis of B-LD even if applied on FFPE samples. Accordingly, when NHL is suspected, negative results at IGH analysis should not be considered as conclusive and further investigation of IGK is appropriate.