Assessment of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha antibody olaratumab in a panel of patient-derived soft tissue sarcoma xenografts.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) comprises a family of rare, heterogeneous tumors of mesenchymal origin. Single-agent doxorubicin remains the first-line standard-of-care treatment for advanced and inoperable STS, but response rates are only around 15%. In 2016, phase Ib/II clinical trial results reported an overall survival benefit of 11.8 months when combining doxorubicin and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-directed antibody olaratumab compared to doxorubicin alone, without providing a scientific rationale for such unprecedented therapeutic effect. We decided to evaluate the efficacy of olaratumab in a panel of STS patient-derived xenografts (PDX). METHODS: NMRI nu/nu mice were bilaterally transplanted with tumor tissue of patient-derived xenograft models expressing PDGFRA, including models of leiomyosarcoma (UZLX-STS22), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (UZLX-STS39), myxofibrosarcoma (UZLX-STS59) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UZLX-STS84). Mice were randomly divided into four different treatment groups: (1) control, (2) doxorubicin (3 mg/kg once weekly), (3) anti-PDGFRA [olaratumab (60 mg/kg twice weekly) + mouse anti-PDGFRA antibody 1E10 (20 mg/kg twice weekly)] and (4) the combination of doxorubicin and anti-PDGFRA (same dose/schedule as in the single treatment arms). Tumor volume, histopathology and Western blotting were used to assess treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Anti-PDGFRA treatment as a single agent did not reduce tumor growth and did not result in significant anti-proliferative or pro-apoptotic activity. Combining doxorubicin and anti-PDGFRA did not reduce tumor burden, though a mild inhibition of proliferation was observed in UZLX-STS39 and -STS59. A pro-apoptotic effect was observed in all models except UZLX-STS22. Antitumor effects on histology were not significantly different comparing doxorubicin and the combination treatment. Moreover, anti-PDGFRA treatment, both as a single agent as well as combined with doxorubicin, did not result in inhibition of the downstream MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to demonstrate significant antitumor effects of anti-PDGFRA treatment in selected STS PDX models, neither alone nor in combination with doxorubicin. This is in line with the very recent results of the phase III clinical trial NCT02451943 ANNOUNCE, which did not confirm the clinical benefit of olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin over single agent doxorubicin.

Overcoming Cost Implications of Mutational Analysis in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Pragmatic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Genetic analysis of tissue derived from patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is not uniformly applied on a national and international level, even though mutational data can provide clinically relevant prognostic and predictive information, especially in patients qualifying for treatment with expensive targeted agents. METHODS: The current article describes the rationale for genetic testing of GIST tissue, looks at financial implications associated with such analysis and speculates on potential cost savings introduced by routine mutational testing and tailored use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on genotyping. This work is based on a hypothetical analysis of epidemiological data, drug costs, reimbursement criteria and market research figures. RESULTS: The cost burden for routine genotyping of important genes in GISTs, especially in patients at high risk for relapse after primary surgery and in advanced, inoperable metastatic disease, is relatively low. The early identification of GISTs with primary resistance mutations should be the basis for personalized GIST treatment and reimbursement of drugs. As illustrated by Belgian figures, the exclusive use of a drug such as imatinib in patients who are likely to benefit from the agent based on genetic information can lead to significant cost savings, which outweigh the costs for testing. CONCLUSIONS: Mutational analysis of GIST should be considered early in all patients at risk for relapse after curative surgery and in the case of advanced, inoperable, metastatic disease. The costs for the actual genotyping should not be used as an argument against profiling of the tumor. The adjuvant and palliative systemic treatment of GISTs should be personalized based on the genotype and other known prognostic and predictive factors. Reimbursement criteria for essential agents such as imatinib should be adapted accordingly.

Therapeutic Efficacy Assessment of CK6, a Monoclonal KIT Antibody, in a Panel of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Xenograft Models.

We evaluated the efficacy of CK6, a KIT monoclonal antibody, in a panel of human gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) xenograft models. Nude mice were bilaterally transplanted with human GIST xenografts (four patient derived and two cell line derived), treated for 3 weeks, and grouped as follows: control (untreated); CK6 (40 mg/kg, 3× weekly); imatinib (50 mg/kg, twice daily); sunitinib (40 mg/kg, once daily); imatinib + CK6; sunitinib + CK6 (same doses and schedules as in the single-agent treatments). Tumor volume assessment, Western blot analysis, and histopathology were used for evaluation of efficacy. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U (MWU) and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests. CK6 as a single agent only reduced tumor growth rate in the UZLX-GIST3 model (P = .053, MWU compared to control), while in none of the other GIST models an effect on tumor growth rate was observed. CK6 did not result in significant anti-proliferative or pro-apoptotic effects in any of the GIST models, and moreover, CK6 did not induce a remarkable inhibition of KIT activation. Furthermore, no synergistic effect of combining CK6 with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was observed. Conversely, in certain GIST xenografts, anti-tumor effects seemed to be inferior under combination treatment compared to single-agent TKI treatment. In the GIST xenografts tested, the anti-tumor efficacy of CK6 was limited. No synergy was observed on combination of CK6 with TKIs in these GIST models. Our findings highlight the importance of using relevant in vivo human tumor xenograft models in the preclinical assessment of drug combination strategies.

Characterization and assessment of the sensitivity and resistance of a newly established human gastrointestinal stromal tumour xenograft model to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is most commonly caused by secondary KIT or PDGFRA mutations. In this study we characterize a newly established GIST xenograft model, UZLX-GIST9, and evaluate the in vivo response of the model to standard TKIs (imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib). METHODS: Tumour fragments from a metastatic lesion of a GIST patient clinically progressing after treatment with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib were engrafted in a nude, immunodeficient mouse. Upon sequential passaging from mouse to mouse, tumour fragments were collected for histopathological and molecular characterization. The sensitivity of the model to treatment with TKIs was evaluated in 28 mice [passage 2 (n = 8), passage 4 (n = 20), 41 tumours]. Mice were grouped as follows: control (untreated), imatinib (50 mg/kg/BID), imatinib (100 mg/kg/BID), sunitinib (40 mg/kg/QD), and regorafenib (30 mg/kg/QD). After three weeks of oral treatment, tumours were collected for subsequent analysis. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by tumour volume, histopathology and Western immunoblotting. RESULTS: UZLX-GIST9 maintains the same typical morphological features and immunohistochemical characteristics as the original patient biopsy and expresses CD117 and DOG1. The KIT mutational profile (p.P577del + W557LfsX5+ D820G) remains the same as the original tissue sample originating from an intraspinal metastatic site. Three week treatment with different TKIs showed that the model is resistant to imatinib. Sunitinib induces tumour growth delay and regorafenib reduces the tumour burden by 30% as compared to control animals. While none of the TKIs had a significant effect on cell proliferation or cell survival, a remarkable increase of necrosis and significant reduction of microvessel density was observed under sunitinib and regorafenib. Western immunoblotting showed a mild reduction in KIT and AKT activation only in regorafenib treated tumours. CONCLUSIONS: We established a novel human GIST xenograft, UZLX-GIST9, harbouring KIT exon 11 and 17 mutations and maintaining the pheno-and genotype of the original tumour. UZLX-GIST9 shows different levels of response to standard TKIs. This model will help to study TKI resistance and to explore novel treatment approaches for patients with TKI-resistant GIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors II: medical oncology and tumor response assessment.

The finding of mutations of KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and subsequent development of kinase-directed therapy in metastatic GIST serve as a touchstone for the translation of laboratory research into clinical therapeutics. A variety of novel developments have followed the discovery of clinical activity of kinase-directed therapy against GIST. Radiological assessment of GIST challenges the standard of care for assessing tumor responses, ie, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Furthermore, the determination of the relationship of specific KIT mutations and sensitivity and resistance to kinase-directed agents and the assessment of inhibitor levels and the quality of response to those agents have implications beyond the treatment of sarcomas. These discoveries and the next chapters in this developing story are discussed in this review.