The Effect of Hospital Market Competition on the Adoption of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has grown rapidly. The purpose of this study was to assess whether hospital market competition was associated with the use of TAVR. METHODS: We used 5 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient databases (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Massachusetts, Washington) to identify patients undergoing TAVR (n = 5563) or surgical aortic valve replacement (n = 30,672) across 154 hospitals from 2011 to 2014. Using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) to calculate market competition, hospitals were categorized into commonly used categories of low (HHI >0.25), moderate (HHI 0.15-0.25), and high (HHI <0.15) competition. We associated market competition category with TAVR utilization using hierarchical logistic regression, adjusting for patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, year, and hospital random effect. We modeled associations between HHI category and in-hospital mortality, admission length of stay, and discharge to home as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: After adjustment, patients treated at high-competition hospitals had higher odds of receiving TAVR, relative to patients at low-competition hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 5.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-13.4). TAVR use increased each year (ORadj, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.38-2.17) but was similar across HHI categories. Competition was not associated with in-hospital mortality or length of stay. Patients at high-competition hospitals were more likely to be discharged home (ORadj, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.23-4.66) compared with patients at low-competition hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Market competition was positively associated with a hospital's adoption of TAVR. Future studies should further examine the impact of competition on quality and appropriateness.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe mitral or tricuspid regurgitation at extreme risk for surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and severe mitral regurgitation or severe tricuspid regurgitation were excluded from the major transcatheter aortic valve replacement trials. We studied these 2 subgroups in patients at extreme risk for surgery in the prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm CoreValve US Expanded Use Study. METHODS: The primary end point was all-cause mortality or major stroke at 1 year. A favorable medical benefit was defined as a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score greater than 45 at 6 months and greater than 60 at 1 year and with a less than 10-point decrease from baseline. RESULTS: There were 53 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics for the severe mitral regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation cohorts were age 84.2 ± 6.4 years and 84.9 ± 6.5 years; male, 29 (54.7%) and 22 (41.5%), and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.9% ± 5.0% and 9.2% ± 4.0%, respectively. Improvement in valve regurgitation from baseline to 1 year occurred in 72.7% of the patients with severe mitral regurgitation and in 61.8% of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. A favorable medical benefit occurred in 31 of 47 patients (66.0%) with severe mitral regurgitation and 33 of 47 patients (70.2%) with severe tricuspid regurgitation at 6 months, and in 25 of 44 patients (56.8%) with severe mitral regurgitation and 24 of 45 patients (53.3%) with severe tricuspid regurgitation at 1 year. All-cause mortality or major stroke for the severe mitral regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation cohorts were 11.3% and 3.8% at 30 days and 21.0% and 19.2% at 1 year, respectively. There were no major strokes in either group at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe mitral regurgitation or severe tricuspid regurgitation is reasonable and safe and leads to improvement in atrioventricular valve regurgitation.

A population-based analysis of endovascular versus open thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The perioperative outcomes of open surgical and endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) during the last 3 months of 2005 were compared using a national administrative database. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients undergoing open aneurysm repair (OAR) or endovascular TAA repair (TEVAR) from October 1 to December 31, 2005. Patient demographic data, length of stay, hospital charges, patient disposition, and mortality were examined. Where appropriate, univariate tests of association used the chi(2) test, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality, complications, and discharge status. RESULTS: A total of 1030 patients underwent open TAA repair and 267 underwent TEVAR. There was no significant difference in mortality between OAR and TEVAR (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-2.12), although OAR patients were more likely to have cardiac, respiratory, and hemorrhagic complications. Patients undergoing TEVAR were more likely to be discharged to home (adjusted OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.93-13.70) and had a decreased length of stay (5.7 days vs 9.9 days; P = .0015). The differences in hospital charges and costs were not significant. CONCLUSION: Although further study is warranted, this study of a national sample suggests that endovascular TAA repair is safe in the short-term, associated with fewer cardiac, respiratory, and hemorrhagic complications, and requires a shorter hospital stay.

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the effect of protamine on paraprosthetic aortic insufficiency immediately after stentless tissue aortic valve replacement.

Mild paravalvular aortic insufficiency (AI) is common immediately after stentless bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Although resolution of paraprosthetic jets with protamine has been described, the predictability of resolution has not been addressed. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed before and after protamine administration among 2 groups. The first group (n = 20) was used to define the prevalence and severity of paravalvular AI after stentless tissue AVR, and define a threshold value for jet size associated with resolution with protamine. A second group (n = 18) was used to prospectively test the determined threshold. Paravalvular AI occurred in 13 of 20 (65%) patients. Using a threshold value of 0.3 cm or less jet width, prospective testing revealed positive and negative predictive values for AI resolution with protamine of 93% (14 of 15) and 100% (3 of 3), respectively. Protamine administration is associated with resolution of small AI jets immediately after implantation of a stentless aortic bioprosthesis, with a jet width 0.3 cm or less strongly predictive of resolution.