Assessment of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy: multicenter cohort study.

To propose an appropriate prophylactic antimicrobial therapy for patients undergoing brachytherapy, we evaluated the relationships between various antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) protocols and the incidence of postimplant infections in a multicenter cohort study conducted in Japan. The records of 826 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent a transperineal (125)I brachytherapy procedure between January 2009 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative infections, including surgical site and remote infections, were recorded up to postoperative day 30. A total of 6 (0.73%) patients had a perioperative infection following seed implantation, of whom all received AMP for 1 or more days. None of the patients who received a single-dose protocol of AMP using fluoroquinolone p.o. or penicillin with a beta-lactamase inhibitor i.v. developed a perioperative infection. Statistical analysis showed that a single-dose protocol was more significantly related to a lower risk of perioperative infection as compared to the other AMP protocols examined (p = 0.045). Furthermore, our results indicated that bacteriuria and preoperative hair removal were risk factors of perioperative infection with statistical significance (p = 0.007, p = 0.004). Analysis of patient clinical parameters, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diabetes mellitus, prostate volume, numbers of implanted seeds and needle punctures, operation time, and indwelling duration time of the Foley catheter, did not reveal significant differences in terms of perioperative infection. Our results indicated that a single-dose AMP protocol is sufficient to prevent perioperative infections following seed implantation. On the other hand, AMP is only one of several measures to prevent perioperative infectious complications. It is necessary to know that the patient must have no bacteriuria and that preoperative hair removal should be avoided.

Evaluation by Monte Carlo simulation of levofloxacin dosing for complicated urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We evaluated, by Monte Carlo simulation, 500-mg once-daily, 100-mg thrice-daily, 200-mg twice-daily, and 200-mg thrice-daily dose regimens of levofloxacin (LVFX), for the ratio of area under the concentration-time curve for 24 h (AUC(0-24)) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (AUC(0-24)/MIC) and the ratio of maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) to MIC (C(max)/MIC), which predict microbiological outcomes, and the C(max)/MIC, which inhibits fluoroquinolone resistance selection, in complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) with Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Monte Carlo simulation was performed for 10000 cases using the pharmacokinetic data of patients with complicated UTIs and the LVFX MIC distributions for E. coli or P. aeruginosa clinical strains. The probabilities of achieving the AUC(0-24)/MIC target (66.2-67.9%) and the C(max)/MIC target (64.5-67.5%) to eradicate E. coli were similar among the 4 regimens. In eradication of P. aeruginosa, the 200-mg thrice-daily and the once-daily dose regimens produced higher probabilities of achieving the AUC(0-24)/MIC target (57.5%) and C(max)/MIC target (55.1%), respectively. For the probabilities of achieving the C(max)/MIC targets that prevent the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance, the once-daily dose regimen (66.8%) did not differ from the other multiple-dose regimens (62.3-66.2%) in E. coli, whereas the former regimen (44.2%) was superior to the latter regimens (10.8-31.7%) in P. aeruginosa. The 500-mg once-daily dose regimen of LVFX, which produced the larger AUC(0-24) and higher C(max), could ensure the efficacy of eradication of uropathogens and reduce the risk of fluoroquinolone resistance selection in complicated UTIs.

Nutritional screening with Subjective Global Assessment predicts hospital stay in patients with digestive diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Nutritional status is an important factor that determines hospital stay, and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a candidate tool for nutritional screening on admission. However, the significance of the SGA has not been evaluated well in the ward for digestive diseases. We conducted the present study to test whether the SGA predicts hospital stay of these patients. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-two patients with digestive diseases were consecutively enrolled between July 2004 and April 2005. They consisted of 145 males and 117 females and included 110 patients with cancer. Disease category was gastrointestinal in 94, hepatic in 111, and biliary/pancreatic in 57. The SGA was performed by a certified dietician. Effects of SGA and other nutritional parameters on hospital stay were examined by simple and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Among tested variables, simple regression analysis identified the SGA, disease category, presence of malignancy, serum albumin level, percent triceps skinfold thickness, and percent arm muscle circumference as significant predictive parameters for hospital stay. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the SGA had the best predictive power, followed by the presence of malignancy and disease category. CONCLUSION: The SGA is a simple and reliable predictor for hospital stay in patients with digestive diseases.