[On general practitioners' care of patients with asthma]. / HausärztlicheVersorgung von Patienten mit Asthma.

UNLABELLED: This review offers readers new aspects for the guideline-compliant care of asthma patients. Here, attention is focused on illustrating the bottlenecks in the administration of good and practicable therapeutic care and listing these as "major challenges for GPs". The interdisciplinary team of authors - consisting of three hospital-based pulmonologists, one pulmonologist in private practice, one internist in general practice, one pharmacist and one health economist discussed aspects of asthma therapy relevant in clinical practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Practicable results for the reader included an asthma pentagram, a graphic depicting the links and interactions between diagnosis, symptom management, communication, application and costs. From this emerged a consensus on four recommendations that can help GPs improve their care of their patients: (1) Whenever possible, have a specialist verifythe diagnosis. (2) Practice inhalation techniques with the patient and check up on their technique at regular intervals. (3) Monitor and fine-tune the therapeutic goals set down together with the patient. (4) Clearly define the (patient's) responsibilities and who is organizing care (communication between GP-specialist-patient-pharmacist-family members).

[On the prognosis of hip fractures. Assessment of mortality after hip fractures by analyzing overlapping segments of longitudinal data]. / Zur Prognose der Schenkelhalsfraktur. Beurteilung der Mortalität nach Schenkelhalsfraktur durch sektorübergreifende Datenzusammenführung.

BACKGROUND: Data on the treatment of hip fractures in acute care settings have been collected in a report card system for quality assurance in Germany since the beginning of the 1990s. However, there are no data on the long-term outcome and long-term quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a retrospective study, data on 1393 patients from 1999 were collected from different sources: from the department of quality assurance at the medical association of Westfalia-Lippe, the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (AOK), and the Medical Review Board of the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenkasse, MDK). Statistical analyses were performed by the Center for Clinical Studies of the University of Düsseldorf. RESULTS: Uni- and multivariate analyses reveal the following prognostic parameters for survival after hip fracture: sex, age, nursing care dependency, living in a nursing home, risk stratification according to ASA, and postoperative complications. Timing of the operation had no affect on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors for the outcome after hip fracture can only be obtained by analyzing data from the hospital stay and the post-hospital setting as well. Chances of survival can be significantly improved by rehabilitative care.

Attitude towards clinical trials: results of a survey of persons interested in research.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Patient recruitment is a major problem in clinical trials. In a survey, the attitude of a public sample towards clinical trials was assessed. SUBJECTS: In a survey 225 visitors to the Heinrich-Heine University were interviewed with respect to their attitude towards clinical trials. METHODS: Visitors were interviewed with regard to sociodemographic variables, disease status, knowledge about and experience of trials and attitude towards clinical trials. Three scenarios for clinical trials were presented (dental trial, surgical trial, pharmaceutical trial). RESULTS: In general, a positive attitude was found. Clinical trials were judged important by 89.5% of the survey participants; however, only 25% would take part in clinical trials. The likelihood of potential participation was lower in the surgical trial than in the dental or pharmaceutical trial scenarios. The willingness to participate was significantly higher in persons, who considered trials to be important, with general knowledge about clinical trials and with previous trial participation. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to participate in a clinical trial is still low in the public. More information and involvement in clinical trials may improve the general attitude.