[From Model to Regional Regular Care - Long-Term Effects of a Regional Budget]. / Vom Modell zur Regionalen Regelversorgung.

AIM: Model projects of a regional budget or a model project according to §â€Š64b SGB V have been for more than 18 years. The structural, economic, and therapeutic long-term effects are described in this paper. METHODOLOGY: The model project in the Steinburg district (Schleswig-Holstein) describes the developments between 2002 (index year) and 2020 that have developed through the regional budget. The article describes the situation and its specific changes in the first german model region. There is no comparable control group. RESULTS: In the observed period, the number of people treated was stable within a corridor that has been in the contract with the stakeholders. Care has shifted relevantly from fully inpatient to outpatient and day clinic treatment. The costs have remained stable and thus differ significantly from the overall increase in health care costs. New supply concepts could be implemented. CONCLUSION: The model projects described lead to setting-independent care and are suitable for standard care in a defined region.

Individual and Needs-Based: The Platform-Model for Personnel Allocation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy.

Objective: An initiative by scientific societies of psychiatry, child and adolescent psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, and further associations established the Platform-Model for the development of a needs-based system for adequate personnel allocation in psychiatric inpatient and day clinic units. We present the development of the instrument and a pilot study to identify feasibility and limitations. Methods: The basis of the study was a threefold methodological approach. Paradigmatic case vignettes adequately reflecting symptomatology and circumstances were described and validated, working profiles were generated and validated, and a matrix representing different needs-based dimensions was developed. Through reference date surveys, patients were assigned to needs-based clusters and Psych-PV categories. The required treatment effort under consideration of guidelines or expert consensus was estimated in several rounds of expert panels (Delphi method). Results: The pilot study proves the feasibility of the Platform-Model. Methodological findings as well as limitations of the model were identified in order to further develop the Platform-Model. Conclusions: The Platform-Model cannot serve as a tool to describe clinical pathways, but it appears to be an adequate and practical tool for assessment of the required staffing level based on patient needs independent of diagnosis and setting.

Changes in German Mental Health Care by Implementing a Global Treatment Budget-A Mixed-Method Process Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, there is a broad spectrum of outreach and integrative care models, whereas in Germany acute psychiatric treatment is still mostly provided in inpatient settings. To overcome this, a new legal framework (§64b Social Code V) has been introduced, promoting "Flexible and Integrative Treatment" Models (FIT64b), based on a "Global Treatment Budget" (GTB) financing approach. 23 hospitals have implemented the framework according to local needs and concepts. Prior research has already identified specific components of FIT64b. Based on this, our paper aims to examine the implementation process and underpinning change mechanisms of GTB-based FIT64b models from a staff, service user and caregiver perspective. METHOD: 31 focus groups and 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital staff (n = 138), service users (n = 63), and caregivers (n = 35) in 10 psychiatric hospitals implementing FIT64b. Using qualitative analysis, we identified 5 core themes describing the implementation process, which were theoretically modeled into a logical diagram. The core mechanisms of change were thus identified across themes. Additional structural and semi-quantitative performance data was collected from all study departments. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis showed that the shift from a daily- and performance-based payment to a lump-sum GTB and the shift of resources from in- to outpatient settings were of crucial importance for the process of change. Saved budget shares could be reinvested to integrate in-, out-, and day-patient units and to set up outreach home care. Clinicians reported feeling relieved by the increase of treatment options. They also emphasized a stronger relationship with and a better understanding of service users and a simplification of bureaucracy. Finally, service users and caregivers experienced higher need-adaptedness of treatment, a feeling of deeper understanding and safety, and the possibility to maintain everyday life during treatment. Finally, two FIT64b implementation prototypes were classified according to the semi-quantitative performance data. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, we developed 3 core mechanisms of change of FIT64b models: (1) Need-adaptedness and flexibility; (2) Continuity of care; (3) Maintaining everyday life. Our findings outline and emphasize the potential a GTB approach may have for improving psychiatric hospital services.

[Staffing of inpatient psychiatric facilities : A patient-oriented and guideline-oriented staffing concept]. / Personalausstattung in stationären psychiatrischen Einrichtungen : Ein patientenorientiertes und leitliniengerechtes Konzept zur Personalbemessung.

BACKGROUND AND GOAL: According to § 136a (2) SGB V (volume V of the German Social Security Code) the German legislator instructed the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) to specify binding minimum standards for the staff needed for the treatment in inpatient psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. This induced the expert associations/organizations to develop their own conceptional approach as to the future organization of staffing. METHOD: Organization of regular expert workshops, the results of which were systematically documented and validated by the experts. RESULTS: The essential elements of the concept are: the starting points for the calculation are the needs of all patients treated in the institution. The need for treatment has three dimensions: (a) psychiatric psychotherapeutic/psychosomatic psychotherapeutic/pediatric and adolescent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic, (b) somatic and (c) psychosocial needs. The model developed by the platform distinguishes between staff requirements being directly related to the treatment of the individual patient, staff requirements caused by the treatment setting and such staff requirements arising at an institutional level. Minimum staff requirement is understood as the staff structure which is, among others, needed to guarantee the multiprofessional, physician-led treatment and the required medical care services for all patients specified by the existing guidelines or an expert consensus as well as to ensure the protection of the patient, fellow patients and the employees working in the facility against hazards. CONCLUSION: This model considers the medical progress within the meaning of the evidence-based guidelines and the modified healthcare practice including sociopolitical standards aimed at the patients' self-determination.

[The region as a cooperation framework in psychiatric care]. / Die Region als Kooperationsrahmen in der psychiatrischen Versorgung.

Mental illnesses regularly impair participation in social life. Therefore it is from a therapeutic point of view very important to offer community-based therapy focused to individual needs. The psychiatric treatment system in Germany, which is currently highly fragmented, must be modified in the sense of a functionally networked structure.Various control aspects are of particular importance. In terms of regional care, there are different care models in Germany. The focus is on "regional budgets", which are implemented in 19 regions in Germany. In addition, there are care approaches in the form of "stepped care," "home treatment," and "assertive community treatment."It turns out that new care structures based on regional framework conditions and new provision of care in psychiatry and psychotherapy are suitable for offering treatment measures tailored to individual needs. Due to the principle of regional responsibility, a reorientation to a more ambulant psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care that supports participation in life can be achieved.

Accuracy of self-reports of mental health care utilization and calculated costs compared to hospital records.

Assessments of service utilization is often based on self-reports. Concerns regarding the accuracy of self-reports are raised especially in mental health care. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of self-reports and calculated costs of mental health services. In a prospective cohort study in Germany, self-reports regarding psychiatric inpatient and day-care use collected by telephone interviews based on the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI) as well as calculated costs were compared to computerized hospital records. The sample consisted of patients with mental and behavioral disorders resulting from alcohol (ICD-10 F10, n=84), schizophrenia, schizophrenic and delusional disturbances (F2, n=122) and affective disorders (F3, n=124). Agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), mean difference (95% confidence intervals (CI)) and the 95% limits of agreement. Predictors for disagreement were derived. Overall agreement of mean total costs was excellent (CCC=0.8432). Costs calculated based on self-reports were higher than costs calculated based on hospital records (15 EUR (95% CI -434 to 405)). Overall agreement of total costs for F2 patients was CCC=0.8651, for F3 CCC=0.7850 and for F10 CCC=0.6180. Depending on type of service, measure of service utilization and costs agreement ranged from excellent to poor and varied substantially between individuals. The number of admissions documented in hospital records was significantly associated with disagreement. Telephone interviews can be an accurate data collection method for calculating mean total costs in mental health care. In the future more standardization is needed.

[Changes in mental health care by a regional budget: results of a pilot Project in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany)]. / Veränderung der psychiatrischen Versorgung durch ein Regionales Budget: Ergebnisse eines Modellprojektes in Schleswig-Holstein.

OBJECTIVES: In a region of Schleswig-Holstein, a regional budget was used to investigate which structural changes would be brought about by a financial plan which enables (clinical) treatment that defies rigid financial limits and makes flexible treatment in various settings possible. RESULTS: In 5 years, the number of inpatient treatment places in the care region was reduced considerably. The length of stay per patient and year decreased by 25 %. Day care and outpatient treatment offers were expanded substantially and new treatment concepts were established. The quality of treatment remained safeguarded. CONCLUSIONS: A regional budget is suitable for bringing about fundamental changes in terms of content and structure in psychiatric care. The result is clearly improved flexibility as compared to previous care structures; incentives for disorders are reduced. The principle "outpatient before inpatient" is strengthened. The financial plan can be transposed onto other regions, whereby modifications according to the structure of the care region seem necessary.

[The regional psychiatry budget (RPB): a model for a new payment system of hospital based mental health care services]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget (RPB): Ein Modell für das neue pauschalierende Entgeltsystem psychiatrischer Krankenhausleistungen?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of a capitated multi-sector-financing model for psychiatric care (RPB) on costs and effectiveness of care. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis according to ICD-10 F10, F2 or F3 were interviewed in the model region (MR, n = 258) and a control region (CR, n = 244) financed according to the fee-for-service principle. At baseline, 1.5 years and 3.5 years follow-up patients were interviewed using measures of psychopathology (CGI-S, HoNOS, SCL-90R, PANSS, BRMAS / BRMES), functioning (GAF, SOFAS) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF, EQ-5D). Use of care was determined semi-annually. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the development of psychopathology and quality of life between MR and CR. In the MR, functioning of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders improved significantly more strongly. The development of total mental health care costs was not different between MR and CR. However, the costs of office based mental health care increased slightly more strongly in the MR, indicating a small cost-shift from the RPB to extrabudgetary financed services. CONCLUSIONS: The RPB showed slight advantages regarding the effectiveness of care and did not significantly change the total mental health care costs.

[The regional psychiatry budget: costs and effects of a new multisector financing model for psychiatric care]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget: Kosten und Effekte eines neuen sektorübergreifenden Finanzierungsmodells für die psychiatrische Versorgung.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new multi-sector financing model for psychiatric care based on the capitation principle (Regional Psychiatry Budget, RPB). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis according to ICD-10 F10, F2, and F3 were interviewed in the model region (MR, N=258) and a control region (CR, N=244) financed according to the fee-for-service principle. Effectiveness of care was assessed before RPB-introduction and after 1.5 years. Use of care was determined semi-annually. RESULTS: Costs of inpatient psychiatric treatment decreased more strongly in the MR, while hospital based outpatient care and day clinic treatment were intensified in comparison to the CR. Quality of life, severity of illness and illness-specific symptoms in patients improved similarly in MR and CR. The functional level improved more in the MR than in the CR, which was especially evident in schizophrenia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient psychiatric care costs can be reduced with the RPB without compromising the quality of care.

[The regional budget for mental health care: a new approach to combine inpatient and outpatient care]. / Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget: Ein neuer Ansatz zur effizienten Verknüpfung stationärer und ambulanter Versorgungsleistungen.

OBJECTIVE: Due to increasing health care expenditures the discussion about advantages and disadvantages of new methods for resource allocation in mental health care has been intensified. A promising model is the Regional Budget for Mental Health Care, which is currently being examined in Schleswig-Holstein. The present paper describes first experiences with the new resource allocation model. BASIC CONDITIONS: An annual budget, provided for the treatment of a fixed number of patients, makes it possible to reduce inpatient capacity in favour of improved community-integrated approaches for the treatment of acute psychiatric illness. RESULTS: In a first step inpatient capacity will be reduced by 8 percent. By the end of 2007 capacity for hospital day care shall be increased by 87 percent and a home treatment will be implemented. The previous working method, orientated to treatment setting, will be replaced by an approach specialized in diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Regional Budget could improve the continuity and flexibility of patient care. Service providers become motivated to treat in a way, which with little resource consumption achieves a long lasting health status improvement. For health insurances the Regional Budget is an opportunity to limit cost increases.