Examining Implicit Racial Attitudes among College Students in Hawai'i, a Project of the Hawai'i Implicit Bias Initiative.

For the past 2 decades, investigations into implicit racial bias have increased, building evidence on the impact of bias on health and health care for many minority communities in the US. However, few studies examine the presence and impacts of implicit bias in Hawai'i, a context distinct in its history, racial/ethnic diversity, and contemporary inequities. The absence of measures for major racialized groups, such as Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and Filipinos, impedes researchers' ability to understand the contribution of implicit bias to the health and social disparities observed in Hawai'i. The purpose of this study was to measure bias toward these underrepresented groups to gain a preliminary understanding of the implicit racial bias within the distinctive context of this minority-majority state. This study measured implicit racial bias among college students in Hawai'i using 3 implicit association tests (IATs): (1) Native Hawaiian compared to White (N = 258), (2) Micronesian comparedto White (N =257), and (3) Filipino compared to Japanese (N = 236). Themean IAT D scores showed implicit biases that favored Native Hawaiiansover Whites, Whites over Micronesians, and Japanese over Filipinos. Multipleregression was conducted for each test with the mean IAT D score as theoutcome variable. The analysis revealed that race was a predictor in the vastmajority of tests. In-group preferences were also observed. This investigationadvances the understanding of racial/ethnic implicit biases in the uniquelydiverse state of Hawai'i and suggests that established social heirarchies mayinfluence implicit racial bias.

Implicit Racial Attitudes and Associations Among Obstetricians in Hawai'i: a Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pacific Islanders living in Hawai'i with ancestral ties to islands in the western Pacific region of Micronesia are common targets of uninhibited forms of prejudice in multiple sectors, including healthcare. Whether the explicit societal-level attitudes toward this group are reflected in implicit attitudes among healthcare providers is unknown; therefore, we designed a pilot study to investigate this question. Our study measures implicit racial bias toward Pacific Islanders from Micronesia among Obstetrician-Gynecologists (OB-GYNs) in Hawai'i. METHODS: We developed 4 new implicit association tests (IATs) to measure implicit attitudes and associations (i.e., stereotypes) toward Pacific Islanders from Micronesia in 2 conditions: (1) Micronesians vs. Whites and (2) Micronesians vs. Japanese Americans. Participants were practicing OB-GYNs in Hawai'i. The study was conducted online and included survey questions on demographic and physician practice characteristics in addition to IATs. The primary outcome was the mean IAT D score. Associations between IAT D scores and demographic and practice characteristics were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 49 OB-GYNs, 38 (77.6%) were female, mean age was 40 years, 29.5% were Japanese, 22.7% were White, and none were from a Micronesian ethnic group. The mean IAT D score in the Micronesian vs. White condition (N = 29) was 0.181, (SD: 0.465, p < 0.05) for the Attitude IAT and 0.197 (SD: 0.427; p < 0.05) for the Stereotype IAT. CONCLUSION: The findings from this pilot suggest a slight degree of implicit bias favoring Whites over Micronesians within this sample of OB-GYNs and warrant a larger investigation into implicit biases toward this unique and understudied Pacific Islander population.

"It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough": A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care.

OBJECTIVE: To understand how obtaining a medication abortion by mail with telemedicine counseling versus traditional in-clinic care impacted participants' access to care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured telephone interviews with individuals who completed a medication abortion by mail through the TelAbortion study. We asked participants how they learned about telemedicine abortion, reasons for choosing it, what their alternative would have been, and about their experience. We transcribed, coded, and performed qualitative content analysis of the interviews and are presenting a subset of themes related to access to care when the restrictions on clinic dispensing of mifepristone are removed. RESULTS: We interviewed 45 people from January to July 2020. Direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion was more convenient and accessible than in-clinic abortion care when considering the burdens of travel, clinic availability, logistics, and cost that were associated with in-clinic abortion. Stigma led to a prioritization of privacy, and by going to a clinic, participants feared a loss of privacy whereas obtaining a medication abortion by mail made it easier to maintain confidentiality. Faced with these barriers, 13% of participants stated they would have continued their pregnancy if TelAbortion had not been an option. Participants found direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion to be acceptable and recommended it to others. Benefits of telemedicine were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic due to concerns around infection exposure with in-clinic care. CONCLUSION: Going to a clinic was a burden for participants, to the point where some would not have otherwise been able to get an abortion. Medication abortion by mail with telemedicine counseling was a highly acceptable alternative. IMPLICATIONS: Medication abortion by mail can increase access to abortion with the added benefits of increased perceived privacy and decreased logistical burdens. Removing the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone would allow direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion to be implemented outside of a research setting without compromising the patient experience.

A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences in Indication for Cesarean Delivery by Race/Ethnicity.

(1) Background: There are persistent racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery in the United States (U.S.), yet the causes remain unknown. One factor could be provider bias. We examined medical indications for cesarean delivery that involve a greater degree of physician discretion (more subjective) versus medical indications that involve less physician discretion (more objective) to better understand factors contributing to the higher rate among Micronesian, one of the most recent migrant groups in the state, compared to White women in Hawai'i. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect data on 620 cesarean deliveries (N = 296 White and N = 324 Micronesian) at the state's largest maternity hospital. Multivariate regression models were used to examine associations between maternal and obstetric characteristics and (1) subjective indication defined as non-reassuring fetal heart tracing (NRFHT) and arrest of labor disorders, and (2) objective indication defined as all other indications (e.g., malpresentation). (3) Results: We found that Micronesian women had significantly higher odds of cesarean delivery due to a subjective indication compared to White women (aOR: 4.17; CI: 2.52-6.88; P < 0.001; N = 619) after adjusting for multiple covariates. (4) Conclusion: These findings suggest unmeasured factors, possibly provider bias, may influence cesarean delivery recommendations for Micronesian women in Hawai'i.

Structural and Socio-cultural Barriers to Prenatal Care in a US Marshallese Community.

Objectives Pacific Islanders are disproportionately burdened by poorer perinatal health outcomes with higher rates of pre-term births, low birth weight babies, infant mortality, and inadequate or no prenatal care. The aim of this study is to examine Marshallese mothers' beliefs, perceptions, and experiences of prenatal care and to identify potential barriers. Methods Three focus groups were conducted with Marshallese mothers, who were 18 years or older, and living in Arkansas. Focus groups focused on mothers' beliefs, perceptions, and experiences of prenatal care. A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted to identify salient themes within the data. Results The results demonstrated that negotiating health insurance, transportation, and language barriers were all major structural barriers that constrain prenatal care. The social-cultural barriers that emerged included a lack of understanding of the importance of seeking early and consistent prenatal care, as well as how to navigate the healthcare process. The more complicated challenges that emerged were the feelings of shame and embarrassment due to the perception of their age or being unmarried during pregnancy not being acceptable in American culture. Furthermore, the participants described perceived discrimination from prenatal care providers. Lastly, the participants described fear as a barrier to seeking out prenatal care. Conclusions for Practice This study identified both structural and socio-cultural barriers that can be incorporated into suggestions for policy makers to aid in alleviating maternal health disparities among Pacific Islander women. Further research is needed to address the Marshallese mothers' perceived discrimination from maternal health care providers.

Patient and provider perspectives on using telemedicine for chronic disease management among Native Hawaiian and Alaska Native people.

BACKGROUND: Among indigenous populations in remote locations who are at increased risk for chronic diseases such as diabetes, telemedicine has the potential to improve access to health care services and thus may reduce adverse health outcomes. Yet few studies are available on how best to use telemedicine technology in reducing ethnic and racial health care disparities. OBJECTIVE: We examined perspectives of patients and providers in 2 indigenous populations in Alaska and Hawai'i about the use of telemedicine in primary care chronic disease management. DESIGN: Six focus groups with patients and providers at 2 sites (3 in Alaska and 3 in Hawai'i). RESULTS: Three broad themes were common to both sites: (a) benefits and barriers of using telemedicine; (b) building patient-provider relationships; and (c) elements of an acceptable telemedicine primary care encounter. Two key elements were endorsed by both patients and providers as important for an effective telemedicine encounter: (a) the initial patient-provider interaction should be face-to-face; and (b) patients must see the same provider on follow-up visits. CONCLUSION: The use of telemedicine in chronic disease management has potential to improve patient care in remote indigenous populations and may supplement patient-provider relationships.