The EMA Assessment of Asciminib for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Who Were Previously Treated With at Least Two Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Asciminib is an allosteric high-affinity tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of the BCR-ABL1 protein kinase. This kinase is translated from the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Marketing authorization for asciminib was granted on August 25, 2022 by the European Commission. The approved indication was for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in the chronic phase which have previously been treated with at least 2 TKIs. Clinical efficacy and safety of asciminib were evaluated in the open-label, randomized, phase III ASCEMBL study. The primary endpoint of this trial was major molecular response (MMR) rate at 24 weeks. A significant difference in MRR rate was shown between the asciminib treated population and the bosutinib control group (25.5% vs. 13.2%, respectively, P = .029). In the asciminib cohort, adverse reactions of at least grade 3 with an incidence ≥ 5% were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, increased pancreatic enzymes, hypertension, and anemia. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application which led to the positive opinion by the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.

The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view.

The high prices of new anticancer drugs and the marginal added benefit perceived by some stakeholders have fuelled a debate on the value of anticancer drugs in the European Union, even though an agreed definition of what constitutes a drug's value does not exist. In this Perspective, we discuss the value of drugs from different viewpoints and objectives of decision makers: for regulators, assessment of the benefit-risk balance of a drug is a cornerstone for approval; payers rely on cost-effectiveness analyses carried out by health technology assessment agencies for reimbursement decisions; for patients, treatment choices are based on personal preferences and attitudes to risk; and clinicians can use several scales (such as the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS)) that have been developed as an attempt to measure value objectively. Although a unique definition that fully captures the concept of value is unlikely to emerge, herein we discuss the importance of understanding different perspectives, and how regulators can help to inform different decision makers.

Recent Advances in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy as Treatment for Allergic Asthma: A Practical Overview.

The Global Initiative for Asthma Report updated in 2019 stated that potential benefits of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), compared to pharmacological and avoidance options, must be weighed against the risk of adverse effects and the inconvenience and cost of the prolonged course of therapy in asthma. Thus, with the aim of clarifying some aspects with regard to the possible use of AIT in allergic asthma treatment armamentarium, a group of expert allergists from the Spanish Allergy and Clinical Immunology Scientific Society (SEAIC), particularly from the Immunotherapy and Asthma Interest Groups developed a frequently asked questions in clinical practice. This document updates relevant topics on the use of AIT in asthma and could facilitate physician clinical decisions and improve health outcomes for individual patients.

High serum levels of IL-2R, IL-6, and TNF-α are associated with higher tumor burden and poorer outcome of follicular lymphoma patients in the rituximab era.

The clinical behavior of FL patients is heterogeneous. The levels of sIL-2R have been correlated with tumor burden and outcome in FL. However, the impact of IL-6 and TNF-α in this disease is unclear. We studied 253 patients diagnosed with grade 1-3a FL between 2002 and 2018, with available information on serum levels of sIL-2R, IL-6, and TNF-α at diagnosis. Patients with cytokine levels above the cutoff had features of a higher tumor burden and higher-risk disease. Levels of any of the studied cytokines above the cutoff and a higher number of cytokines above the cutoff impacted on a shorter PFS and OS. TNF-α levels were an independent predictor of a poorer PFS. No differences were observed in the risk of histological transformation or second malignancies. The determination of cytokine levels in FL patients is feasible in clinical practice, and elevated levels are associated with a higher tumor burden and poorer survival.

Immunogenicity Assessment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in the Clinical Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are increasingly used for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunogenicity of these drugs poses therapeutic challenges such as therapeutic failure and adverse effects in a number of patients. Evaluation of clinical nonresponsiveness includes laboratory testing for drug concentrations and detecting the presence of antidrug antibodies. CONTENT: This review provides an overview of the immunogenicity of TNF antagonists and testing methodologies currently available for measuring antidrug antibody response, which decreases treatment efficacy and may result in therapeutic failure. This review summarizes methodologies such as binding assays, including ELISA and HPLC-based homogenous mobility shift assay, as well as functional cell-based assays such as reporter gene assay. Furthermore, based on the laboratory findings of testing for antidrug antibody response, as well as serum drug concentrations, an algorithm is provided for interpretation, based on the current available literature and guidelines, which may aid in determining optimal therapy after treatment failure. SUMMARY: Laboratory testing methodologies for measuring serum concentrations of TNF inhibitors and antidrug antibodies are clinically available. These methods provide an evidence-based, personalized approach for the workup of patients showing treatment failure, which saves time and resources, and contributes to improved patient care.

Associated Risk Factors for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Subjects with Diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) confers a higher risk for active tuberculosis (TB). However, information on associated risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) inpatients with DM2 is limited. We conducted a cross-sectional study to elucidate the prevalence of LTBI and its associated factors on Mexican adults with DM2 receiving medical care at the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS). METHODS: Six hundred patients with DM2 without a prior history of TB from outpatient diabetes clinics were enrolled in the study. The tuberculin-skin-test (TST) was performed. The presence of LTBI was defined by a TST value of ≥ 5 mm. A standardized interview and physical examination were conducted to obtain clinical, demographic, and LTBI risk factor information; all subjects were laboratory tested to determine the presence of exclusion criteria. Microscopic examination of sputum samples and chest x-rays was performed to identify potential active TB. Subjects with any finding suggesting active TB or malignancy were excluded. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with LTBI. RESULTS: LTBI prevalence among patients with DM2 was 51.3%. Risk factors for LTBI were living with a relative with TB, having been in prison, having hemoglobin values >14 g/dL, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values of > 7%. Blood pressure, economic income, or anthropometric measurements were not associated risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Over one half of patients with DM harbor LTBI. Exposure to certain environmental conditions and poorly controlled DM2 (HbA1c > 7.0%) were risk factors for having LTBI in persons with DM2.

[Cost-reduction analysis for oral versus intravenous fludarabine (Beneflur) in Spain]. / Análisis de minimización de costes de fludarabina (Beneflur) oral vs. vía intravenosa en España.

INTRODUCTION: Various international studies have shown that fludarabine is effective, safe, and efficient for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). The purpose of the present study was to carry out a cost-minimization analysis for two alternative forms of fludarabine (oral and intravenous) used to treat B-CLL in Spain. METHODS: The presence of clinical evidence about the treatment equivalence of the two options being compared (oral fludarabine vs. intravenous fludarabine) led us to carry out a cost-minimization analysis. A pharmacoeconomic model was constructed to compile data from the literature and experts' opinions in order to determine the use of health resources associated with the treatment; unit costs were obtained from Spanish databases. The analysis contemplated two perspectives: that of the national health service, which includes only direct health costs, and the social perspective, which also includes the indirect costs that result from loss of productivity. RESULTS: Although fludarabine in its oral form has a higher purchase price than generic intravenous fludarabine does, increased administration costs for the latter, which is used in hospitals, mean that oral fludarabine use produces total savings of euro1,908 and euro1,292 for single-drug therapy and combined therapy with cyclophosphamide, respectively. Including indirect costs increased the savings associated with the oral form of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: In B-CLL patients, treatment with oral fludarabine has a lower cost than treatment with intravenous fludarabine, in both single-drug therapy and combined therapy. Various sensitivity analyses confirmed these results and showed that oral fludarabine should be the treatment of choice for B-CLL in Spain, unless contrain.