Growth modulation index as metric of clinical benefit assessment among advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving trabectedin as a salvage therapy.

BACKGROUND: The growth modulation index (GMI) is the ratio of time to progression with the nth line (TTP(n)) of therapy to the TTP(n)(-1) with the n-1th line. GMI >1.33 is considered as a sign of activity in phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluated the concordance between the GMI and the efficacy outcomes in 279 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) treated with trabectedin 1.5 mg/m² (24-h infusion every 3 weeks) in four phase II trials. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two (51%) patients received one prior line and 137 ≥ 2 lines. The median TTP(n) was 2.8 months (range 0.2-26.8), whereas the median TTP(n)(-1) was 4.0 months (0.3-79.5). The median GMI was 0.6 (0.0-14.4). Overall, 177 patients (63%) had a GMI <1; 21 (8%) a GMI equal to 1-1.33 and 81 (29%) a GMI >1.33, which correlated with the median overall survival in those patients (9.1, 13.9 and 23.8 months, respectively, P = 0.0005). A high concordance rate between the GMI and response rate (P < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS, P < 0.0001) was observed. Good performance status (PS) was the only factor associated with GMI >1.33 (PS = 0; P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A high GMI was associated with favorable efficacy outcomes in patients treated with trabectedin. Further research is needed to assess GMI as an indicator in this setting.

Anaemia and its functional consequences in cancer patients: current challenges in management and prospects for improving therapy.

Anaemia is a common occurrence in patients with cancer and contributes to the clinical symptomatology and reduced quality of life (QOL) seen in cancer patients. Many aspects of reduced QOL, including fatigue, are known to be associated with suboptimally low levels of haemoglobin. Even mild-to-moderate anaemia adversely affects patient-reported QOL parameters. Red blood cell transfusions are associated with many real and perceived risks, inconveniences, costs, and only temporary benefits. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an effective therapy to increase haemoglobin values in over half of anaemic cancer patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These increased haemoglobin values are closely correlated with improvements in QOL. Despite these objectively defined benefits, less than 50% of anaemic patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy receive rHuEPO, in contrast to patients with chronic renal failure on dialysis, where anaemia is universally and aggressively treated to more optimal haemoglobin values. However, there are several barriers that may limit more widespread use of rHuEPO. These include inconvenience associated with frequent dosing; failure of a large proportion (40 to 50%) of patients to respond; relatively slow time to response; absence of reliable early indicators of response; and current lack of rigorous pharmacoeconomic data demonstrating cost-effectiveness. Darbepoetin alfa is a novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP) that is biochemically distinct from rHuEPO, and which has been proven to stimulate red blood cell production. The molecule has a 3-fold longer half-life and increased biological activity that will allow less frequent dosing, facilitating improved management of the anaemia of cancer. With this new option for therapy, further avenues of investigation should lead to renewed interest in the clinical benefits of optimal haemoglobin levels for patients with cancer.

Pharmacologic treatment options in patients with thrombocytopenia.

Thrombocytopenia that results from chemotherapy has become an increasingly important issue in the treatment of cancer and remains a difficult clinical problem. The identification of a safe and effective platelet growth factor could significantly improve the management of severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. Over the past decade, a number of hematopoietic growth factors with thrombopoietic activity have been identified, including stem-cell factor (c-kit ligand), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-3, IL-6, and IL-11, as well as thrombopoietin (TPO) and its derivatives. Only a few of these agents have shown acceptable tolerability and sufficient ability to stimulate thrombopoiesis to justify testing in randomized clinical trials. Currently, IL-11 is the only cytokine licensed in the United States for treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. However, its thrombopoietic activity is modest and its use is often associated with unfavorable side effects. Identification of TPO, the c-Mpl ligand, as the primary physiologic regulator of megakaryocyte and platelet development offers important promise for treatment of thrombocytopenia. Preliminary clinical studies of recombinant human TPO (rhTPO), a full-length glycosylated molecule, indicate that it is safe and biologically active in reducing severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. In addition to rhTPO, the future may see the development of novel genetically engineered, high-affinity cytokine receptor agonists and c-Mpl ligand mimetic peptides.

Hematopoietic growth factors. Defining the appropriate clinical role in multimodality cancer therapy.

Laboratory investigations have begun to elucidate the regulatory molecules that control the processes of blood cell growth and differentiation. Recombinant human colony-stimulating factors are examples of biotechnology-produced molecules that have epitomized the translation of such basic scientific investigation into therapeutic advances. Small cell lung cancer, a malignancy that is overall highly sensitive to aggressive myelosuppressive chemotherapy at initial presentation, has been used as a clinical model in which the activity of human colony-stimulating factors has been tested. In this article, the clinical applications of hematopoietic growth factors are reviewed in brief. The appropriate clinical use of these agents may allow novel therapeutic strategies to be developed in a research setting. Similarly, these agents have the potential to improve supportive care and improve certain clinical outcomes in the non-research clinical care of patients. Issues of cost of treatment are raised by these agents, but the true clinical value of hematopoietic growth factors needs to be studied more rigorously, with emphasis on quality of life and redistribution of care costs outside of hospitals before definitive statements can be made.