Assessment of children with speech sound disorders in otolaryngology outpatient clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the utility of Ankara Articulation Test (AAT) for the diagnosis of Speech Sound Disorders (SSD) in children by an Otolaryngologist independent of Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP). METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, 83 children comprising 45 boys (54.2%) and 38 girls (45.8%) were enrolled. AAT was applied to the children aged 3-12 years with primary SSD who presented to the otolaryngology outpatient service. Video recording was carried out while testing and the responses to the test were evaluated by another otolaryngologist and SLP. RESULTS: A perfectly significant agreement was found between the speech-language pathologist and otolaryngologist's assessments (Cronbach's Alpha > 0.80). CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists could evaluate SSD with the help of AAT as well as an SLP analysis. Standardized visual tests, such as the AAT, assist the otolaryngologist in the diagnosis of SSD in outpatient clinics.

Scar evaluation in subperiosteal temporal pocket versus the one-layer flap technique in cochlear implantation using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

PURPOSE: To compare the local and intracranial complications, migration of the IRS, surgical duration, and quality of life with the subperiosteal pocket technique and the one-layer flap (OLF) technique using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). METHODS: Eight patients who underwent cochlear implantation. The patients were applied subscales of the POSAS and were asked to respond to the questionnaire items via a telephone conservation conducted by a physician. Another researcher evaluated the patients' photographs using OSAS. POSAS was applied to the patients to compare the differences of scar assessment in subperiosteal pocket technique and the OLF technique. RESULTS: The surgical duration was 72.7 ± 12.3 min in the OLF group and 51.3 ± 11.7 min in the subperiosteal pocket group. The difference was statistically significant. No migration or intracranial complications were observed in either group. Patients in group 1 who underwent the subperiosteal technique were more satisfied than patients who received the OLF technique. However, there was no superiority between the two methods for the observer in scar assessment. CONCLUSION: Although the surgical time is longer, the lack of difference in terms of scar formation from smaller incisions, and few intra- and post-operative complications in experienced hands ensure that the OLF technique is a safe and reliable method in cochlear implantation surgery.