Multiyear experience with mobile online platform for documentation of acute care surgery fellows supervision.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no standard for documenting supervision of acute care surgery (ACS) fellows. To accomplish this goal, we developed a web-based survey that is accessible via mobile platform. We hypothesize that our mobile access survey is an effective, reproducible tool for assessing fellow clinical performance. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2016 to 2022 of all data captured in an encrypted database on all ACS fellows at our institution was performed. Supervision was defined as: Type 1 direct face-to-face, Type 2a immediately available in-house, Type 2b available after notification via phone with remote electronic medical record access, and Type 3 retrospective review. Data were collected by supervising faculty using a web-based clinical performance survey created by fellowship program leadership. Survey data collected included clinical summary, trainee, proctoring faculty, clinical service, operative/nonoperative, supervision type, Zwisch autonomy scale, time to input data, and graduate medical education milestone performance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 883 proctoring events were identified, including the majority as Type 1 (97.4%). Trauma comprised 64% of evaluations. Fifty-two percent of the proctoring events were surgical cases. Complexity was graded as average (77%), hardest (16%), basic (7%). Guidance included supervision only, 491 of 666 (74%), with 26% requiring faculty intervention. Fellow performance was graded as average (66%), above average (31%), and below average/critical deficiency (3%). Graduate medical education performance was available for 247 of 883 interactions identifying 31 events with potential for improvement. Average evaluation completion time: 2 minutes (n = 134). CONCLUSION: A mobile web-based survey is a convenient and reliable tool for documenting ACS fellow clinical activity and was effectively used by all ACS faculty to record supervision. A combination of clinical and objective data is useful to determine ACS fellows' performance and to provide targeted education and remediation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Assessment of safety and effectiveness of non-neurosurgical management for minimal traumatic brain injury (TBI).

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage often receive neurosurgical consultation. However, only a small proportion of patients require intervention. Our hypothesis is that low-risk minimal TBI patients managed without immediate neurosurgical consultation will have a reasonable safety and effectiveness outcome profile. METHODS: A non-neurosurgical management protocol for adult minimal TBI was implemented at a level I trauma center as an interdisciplinary quality-improvement initiative in November 2018. Minimal TBI was defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 secondary to blunt mechanism, without anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, and isolated pneumocephalus and/or traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage on head CT imaging. Safety was assessed by in-hospital mortality, neurosurgical interventions, and ED revisits within two weeks of discharge. Effectiveness was assessed by neurosurgical consult rate and length of stay. Outcomes were compared 8-months pre- and post-protocol implementation. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were included, of which 49 were pre-protocol and 48 were post-protocol There was no difference in rates of in-hospital mortality [0 (0%) vs 0 (0%)], neurosurgical procedure [1 (2.1%) vs 0 (0%)], operations [0 (0%) vs 0 (0%)], and ED revisits [1 (2.0%) vs 2 (4.2%), p = 0.985] between the periods. There was a significant reduction in neurosurgical consults post-protocol implementation (92% vs 29%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A protocol for minimal TBI patients effectively reduced neurosurgical consultation without changes in safety profile. Such an interdisciplinary management protocol for low-risk neurotrauma can effectively utilize the neurosurgery consult services by stratifying neurologically stable TBI patient.

The choices we make: Ethical challenges in trauma surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ethical issues in trauma surgery are commonplace but scarcely studied. We aim to characterize the ethical dilemmas trauma surgeons encounter in clinical practice and describe perceptions about the ability to manage these dilemmas and strategies they use to address them. METHODS: Members of a U.S. trauma society were electronically surveyed on handling ethically challenging scenarios. The survey instrument was developed using published ethics literature and iterative cognitive interviews. Domains included perceived frequency of encountering and self-efficacy of managing ethical situations in trauma surgery. Common situations were defined as those encountered monthly or weekly. Ethical problems were categorized within 7 larger categories: general ethics, autonomy, communication, justice, end-of-life, conflict, and other. Descriptive analyses were performed; group comparisons were analyzed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of 1,748 surveyed, 548 responded (30.6%) and 154 (28%) were female. Most were White, under 55 years age, had completed fellowship training, and were practicing at a level I or II trauma center. The most encountered ethical categories were generic ethics and communication (79%). Issues involving conflict were least frequent (21%). Respondents felt most uncomfortable with autonomy topics. Respondents with high self-efficacy in handling ethical situations were older, in practice ≥15 years, served on an ethics committee, and/or frequently experienced ethical challenges. CONCLUSION: Most trauma surgeons regularly encounter ethical challenges, especially those related to communication. Trauma surgeons encounter ethical issues involving conflict least often, and lowest self-efficacy scores with issues involving autonomy. Experienced trauma surgeons reported higher self-efficacy scores in managing ethical issues. Future work should examine how self-efficacy translates to observed behavior, and how trauma surgeons build and enhance their ethical skillsets in the care of the injured patient.

Far from black and white: Role of race, health literacy, and socioeconomic factors in the presentation of acute diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Racial discrepancies in treatment and outcomes of acute diverticulitis have been observed, yet underlying factors are poorly understood. We aimed to identify racial inequalities in health literacy among patients hospitalized with acute diverticulitis and characterize factors associated with more severe presentation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 947 Black or White patients admitted with acute diverticulitis at a quaternary referral center from January 2009 through September 2019. Health literacy was determined by the validated Brief Health Literacy Screening, and socioeconomic status was defined by the area deprivation index, a composite of multiple neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation measures. The primary outcome was severity of disease presentation represented by systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria; secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, length of stay, and invasive interventions. RESULTS: Among all study participants, 121 (12.8%) self-identified as Black. Overall, 140 (14.8%) patients had inadequate health literacy, and 495 (52.3%) had area deprivation index greater than the national median. There was no association between race or area deprivation index and health literacy. A total of 340 (35.9%) patients met criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and 88 (9.3%) underwent an intervention; median length of stay was 3.5 days. Race, health literacy, and area deprivation index were not significantly associated with outcomes (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute diverticulitis, no difference in severity of presentation by race, health literacy, or area deprivation index was observed. These findings suggest that differences in presentation of acute diverticulitis may not be driven by these social factors. Future studies should include considerations of clinical characteristics of acute diverticulitis, such as the role of access and underuse of healthcare resources.

Artificial intelligence in trauma systems.

Local trauma care and regional trauma systems are data-rich environments that are amenable to machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big-data analysis mechanisms to improve timely access to care, to measure outcomes, and to improve quality of care. Pilot work has been done to demonstrate that these methods are useful to predict patient flow at individual centers, so that staffing models can be adapted to match workflow. Artificial intelligence has also been proven useful in the development of regional trauma systems as a tool to determine the optimal location of a new trauma center based on trauma-patient geospatial injury data and to minimize response times across the trauma network. Although the utility of artificial intelligence is apparent and proven in small pilot studies, its operationalization across the broader trauma system and trauma surgery space has been slow because of cost, stakeholder buy-in, and lack of expertise or knowledge of its utility. Nevertheless, as new trauma centers or systems are developed, or existing centers are retooled, machine learning and sophisticated analytics are likely to be important components to help facilitate decision-making in a wide range of areas, from determining bedside nursing and provider ratios to determining where to locate new trauma centers or emergency medical services teams.

The Silent Majority of Emergency General Surgery: An Assessment of Consult and Operative Volumes.

BACKGROUND: Defining the work performed by emergency general surgery (EGS) surgeons has relied on quantifying surgical interventions, failing to include nonsurgical management performed. The purpose of this study was to identify the extent of operative and nonoperative patient management provided by an EGS service line in response to consults from other hospital providers. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study of all adult patients with an EGS consult request placed from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016 at a 1000-bed tertiary referral center. Consult requests were classified by suspected diagnosis and linked to patient demographic and clinical information. Operative and nonoperative cases were compared. RESULTS: About 4998 EGS consults were requested during the 2-y period, of which 69.6% were placed on the first day of the patient encounter. Disposition outcomes after consultation included admission to the EGS service (27.6%) and discharge from the emergency department (25.3%). Small bowel obstruction, appendicitis, and cholecystitis decisively comprised the top three diagnoses for overall consults and those requiring admission to the EGS service. For every consult requiring an operation (n = 1400), 2.6 consults were managed without an operation (n = 3598). CONCLUSIONS: EGS surgeons are asked to evaluate and manage a variety of potentially surgical diagnoses. As most consults do not require surgical intervention, operative volume is a poor surrogate for quantifying EGS productivity. The role of this service is vital to patient triage and disposition, particularly in the emergency department setting. Institutions should consider the volume of their nonoperative consultations when evaluating EGS service line workload and in guiding staffing needs.