Impact of robotic single and dual console systems in the training of minimally invasive gynecology surgery (MIGS) fellows.

The advantages of dual console use in robotic surgical education have not been described. The aims of this study are to compare fellow console time, surgical steps performed, and surgical takeovers between attending and fellow surgeons using dual versus single console robotic systems. Participants included minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) fellows (N = 3) and subspecialty trained gynecologic surgeons (N = 5). Prospective data were obtained on 126 patients (N = 77 single console, N = 49 dual console) undergoing robotic hysterectomy. Variables included demographics, surgical characteristics (fellow, month of fellowship, attending surgeon, concomitant oophorectomy, additional surgical procedures, estimated blood loss, specimen weight), and outcomes (console time, docking time, console time/docking time ratio, total case time, number of surgical steps performed by the fellow, number of surgical takeovers, complications). After controlling for potential confounders, fellows spent a mean of 25.8 min longer (P < 0.001) at the console in dual console operations compared to single. Dual console surgeries had a greater number of steps performed by the fellow (OR[> 5 steps]: 3.37, P = 0.009), a higher console time/docking time ratio (P < 0.001), and more surgical takeovers between fellow and attending (OR [> 1 takeover]: 3.53, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding docking time (P = 0.15), case time (P = 0.79), or complications (P = 0.30). Our findings suggest dual console robotic training provide fellows the opportunity for more "hands-on" experience with longer console time, higher number of surgical steps performed, and added interaction with the attending surgeon when compared with single console training. These surgical metrics provide objectivity in competency-based robotic training without increasing the complications or surgical time.

The cost of diagnosing endometrial cancer: Quantifying the healthcare cost of an abnormal uterine bleeding workup.

OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of women with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) to detect endometrial cancer (EC) and its precursors is not standardized and can vary widely. Consequently, costs associated with the workup and management undoubtedly vary. This study aimed to quantify costs of AUB/PMB evaluation to understand the healthcare burden associated with securing a pathologic diagnosis. METHODS: Women ≥45 years of age presenting to a single institution gynecology clinic with AUB/PMB for diagnostic workup were prospectively enrolled February 2013-October 2017 for a lower genital tract biospecimen research study. Clinical workup of AUB/PMB was determined by individual provider discretion. Costs of care were collected from administrative billing systems from enrollment to 90 days post enrollment. Costs were standardized and inflation-adjusted to 2017 US Dollars (USD). RESULTS: In total, there were 1017 women enrolled with 5.6% diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer (EC). Within the full cohort, 90-day median cost for AUB/PMB workup and management was $2279 (IQR $512-4828). Among patients with a diagnostic biopsy, median 90-day costs ranged from $2203 (IQR $499-3604) for benign or disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) diagnosis to $21,039 (IQR $19,084-24,536) for a diagnosis of EC. CONCLUSIONS: The costs for diagnostic evaluation of perimenopausal AUB and PMB vary greatly according to ultimate tissue-based diagnosis. Even reassuring benign findings that do not require further intervention-the most common in this study's cohort-yield substantial costs. The development of sensitive, specific, and more cost-effective diagnostic strategies is warranted.

Factors Associated with Burnout and Frustration among Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellows.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of burnout and frustration among participants currently completing a fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (FMIGS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: An anonymous survey was distributed to fellows in November 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Current FMIGS fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 57 of 83 (67.7%) FMIGS participants in American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists-accredited programs completed a survey regarding fellowship characteristics and experiences. Overall, 40 participants (70.2%) indicated that they were satisfied with their fellowship program experience. There were 33 participants (57.9%) who reported burnout, and 38 participants (66.7%) had experienced anxiety, depression, or extreme fatigue during the last month. Of those who reported burnout, 26 (76.5%) reported that they did not receive support from their fellowship program. Participants who experienced burnout were more likely to be in their second year (p = .003), spent less time per week doing scholarly activities (p = .048), and were less satisfied with their fellowship experience (p <.001). Participants who experienced anxiety, depression, or extreme fatigue had more cofellows in their program (p = .031), worked on average more hours per week (p = .020), and were more often required to practice obstetrics in their fellowship (p = .022). CONCLUSION: Burnout symptoms are common among physicians across multiple specialties. Our findings suggest that this issue is prevalent among FMIGS participants. In addition, there is a lack of access to emotional and psychologic support programs for fellows experiencing burnout. We hope that this study will prompt attention to this important topic by both individual programs and American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists as a society to increase awareness and access to resources and promote wellness for fellows.

Establishing Validity for a Vaginal Hysterectomy Simulation Model for Surgical Skills Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To use the Messick validity framework for a simulation-based assessment of vaginal hysterectomy skills. METHODS: Video recordings of physicians at different levels of training and experience performing vaginal hysterectomy on a high-fidelity vaginal surgery model were objectively assessed using a modified 10-item Vaginal Surgical Skills Index, a one-item global scale of overall performance, and a pass-fail criterion. Participants included obstetrics and gynecology trainees and faculty from five institutions. Video recordings were independently assessed by expert surgeons blinded to the identities of the study participants. RESULTS: Fifty surgeons (11 faculty, 39 trainees) were assessed. Experience level correlated strongly with both the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score, with more experienced participants receiving higher scores (Pearson r=0.81, P<.001; Pearson r=0.74, P<.001). Likewise, surgical experience was also moderately correlated with the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score (Pearson r=0.55, P<.001; Pearson r=0.58, P<.001). The internal consistency of the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index was excellent (Cronbach's alpha=0.97). Interrater reliability of the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index and global scale score, as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was moderate to good (0.49-0.95; 0.50-0.87). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve and the pass-fail criterion, a modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index cutoff score of 27 was found to most accurately (area under the curve 0.951, 95% CI 0.917-0.983) differentiate competent from noncompetent surgeons. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated validity evidence for using a high-fidelity vaginal surgery model with the modified Vaginal Surgical Skills Index or global scale score to assess vaginal hysterectomy skills.

Intercepting Endometrial Cancer: Opportunities to Expand Access Using New Technology.

Although endometrial cancer is often diagnosed at an early curable stage, the incidence and mortality from endometrial cancer is rising and minority women are particularly at risk. We hypothesize that delays in clinical presentation contribute to racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality and treatment-related morbidity. Improved methods for endometrial cancer risk assessment and distinguishing abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding from physiologic variation are needed. Accordingly, we propose a multipronged strategy that combines innovative patient education with novel early detection strategies to reduce health impacts of endometrial cancer and its precursors, especially among Black women. Futuristic approaches using gamification, smartphone apps, artificial intelligence, and health promotion outside of the physical clinic hold promise in preventing endometrial cancer and reducing morbidity and mortality related to the disease, but they also raise a number of questions that will need to be addressed by future research.

ACOG Simulation Working Group: A Needs Assessment of Simulation Training in OB/GYN Residencies and Recommendations for Future Research.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current availability and needs of simulation training among obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) residency programs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited OB/GYN residency programs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Residency program directors, gynecology simulation faculty, obstetrics simulation faculty, and fourth-year residents. RESULTS: Of 673 invited participants, 251 (37.3%) completed the survey. Among the survey responses, OB procedures were more broadly represented compared to the GYN procedures for simulation teaching: 8 (50%) of 16 OB procedures versus 4 (18.2%) of 22 GYN procedures had simulation teaching. Among the simulated procedures, a majority of residents and faculty reported that simulation teaching was available for operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia, perineal laceration repair, conventional laparoscopic procedures, and robotic surgery. There were significant differences between residents and faculty perceptions regarding the availability and needs of simulated procedures with a minority of residents having knowledge of Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (47.2%) and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (27.8%) simulation tools compared to the majority of faculty (84.7% and 72.1%, respectively). More than 80% of trainees and faculty reported they felt the average graduating resident could perform vaginal, laparoscopic, and abdominal hysterectomies independently. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation is now widely available for both gynecologic and obstetric procedures, but there remains tremendous heterogeneity between programs and the perceptions of residents, program directors, and faculty. The variations in simulation training and readiness for performing different procedures following residency support the need for objective, validated assessments of actual performance to better guide resident learning and faculty teaching efforts.